Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:25 pm**

turns out im doing nothing tonight. still no computer access till my brother stops being a handsy bitch but i am here

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:25 pm**

In post 1124, Dunnstral wrote:Medea, can you guys simplify why you being a demon means scum can get to 7 in a way that is too fast?

They can send 2 shards instead of their night kill, and there are possibly roles that start with 1 shard or send out 1 shard. Is there anything else?

We did summarize it in a few posts, yes.

Elim day one or kill on us is 1, they likely started with one is two, town hands a shard to a 1-shard player is 3, scum hands two shards to two other players for a potential 5 bagger in absolute worst case scenario of day two start.

And that's with ZERO town shard-adding roles assumed.

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:28 pm**

In post 1127, Medea the Alien wrote:scum hands two shards to two other players for a potential 5 bagger in absolute worst case scenario of day two start.

They have to split their 2 shards between two different people. You're saying they would target multiple players with 1 shard?

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:30 pm**

I am assuming some players have one starting shard.

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:34 pm**

But with 9 needed it should be much harder to reach that threshhold in time.

In any case, I think we should talk about using this mechanic again tomorrow if the mafia choose to kill and it is on a human.

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:36 pm**

In post 1118, Medea the Alien wrote:Not sure if fferyhead will be around due to doggo's schedule, but will try to engage after said walkies once our reads list is up.

Half an hour?

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:39 pm**

In post 1131, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 1118, Medea the Alien wrote:Not sure if fferyhead will be around due to doggo's schedule, but will try to engage after said walkies once our reads list is up.
Half an hour?

That's near the end of our time, but I'll be around to do light phoneposting chats about it.

I hate how it's shaping up to have no major controversial scumreads (well, to me anyways, you may disagree once you see it), but perhaps that's just the fate of rands these days.

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:40 pm**

yahooooooo im back on a computer even though its a shitty chromebook

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:43 pm**

In post 1124, Dunnstral wrote:Medea, can you guys simplify why you being a demon means scum can get to 7 in a way that is too fast?

They can send 2 shards instead of their night kill, and there are possibly roles that start with 1 shard or send out 1 shard. Is there anything else?

They can start out handing their shards to the non-demonified people on their team for starters. That plus us gets to four (they'd know one demon in town is likely) (assuming they did start with a demon...upon reflection it is possible they all started with one shard but don't have power drawbacks or something), and after two days of discussion on who to hand out shards to plus shards going out publicly, they likely would have had a good idea of where to hand shards to make it six. Night Three even one scum left making a lucky shard hit is GG under the seven-hit rule. Generally we'd expect to have a chance to pull the game back Day Four even if we'd screwed up the first three days, but this could be swingy in an axe-falling way.

With nine I'm open to shard distro but only on town reads (as in, people should only vote for them to go to their own town reads, not that there should be a townbloc or some such). And I think being a town read trumps claiming to have a shiny that's 'totally worth it, man!'. With the caveat that if people decline when voted to receive a shard, that should be respected and not seen as an entry point to debate. That gives scum too much info. Let them wonder if it's an already-powered player or someone who's always vanilla or someone with a shit power.

--PA

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:48 pm**

reading this game is killing me today ngl

In post 548, ManateeGal wrote:
In post 531, Lukewarm wrote:@ffery

I may be off here, but I feel like you are engaging with me differently in this game then in our last one, which I think might be because I got hyper paranoid of you day 1 that game.

But I have reached a town read on your slot, and would not longer be paranoid of you
this reads so weird to me i keep coming back to it

i didn't catch this from luke at first, but i think i feel similarly weird about it

In post 597, Medea the Alien wrote:I want to go ahead and give Annie Edison (as notscience) and Snarky Fishes (as ffery) some space for now. I'm not scum reading them at present, but I'm sure not ready to town block them.

is this implying you want more interaction with me and bell?

In post 624, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 622, Annie Edison wrote:Bell, please chill. I actually liked 611.

@LLD- what about Pooky?

[✓*]

*
In post 11, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

I refuse to believe I rolled T/T with cabd 4 games in a row cuz that'd be imba af

does this mean you think pooky is unaligned with medea?

In post 637, ManateeGal wrote:uhhhhhhhh shitty readslist in hopes of engaging w everyone more.

Spoiler:
Annie Edison - I echo sleez's sentiment here when it comes to them being one of the only people i think are approaching Medea in a (towny) manner (theres definitely a better word to get across what im trying 2 say here) so they can have a townread for now. i buy the whole "wanna be town saviour" shtick for now at least.

AA9 - i think most of the convo surrounding them has been their slip which was just nothing??? that discussionfeels misguided at best. i'll admit i dont wanna look for their iso and theyve been pretty forgettable so far

Dunnstral - i think their read on me was pretty shallow when they first dropped it, and i feel like their inability to elaborate on it miiiiiight be a scum scoping out the way the rest of the game is receiving me and if i'll be a viable push. i dont remember anything else.

Here There Be Dragons - lvl 1 townread for now. im not sure theyve posted since ive stated that opinion but it remains the same. ~vibe~ read more then anything else

LadyLambadelta - will probably have more to say when we can get more out of their posting style

Lukewarm - ive outlined most of my thought process regarding him but im struggling to find stuff i like regarding him. as sleez mentioned his medea vote felt opportunistic. not a huge fan

Medea - nullish. im not of the mindset near anything they've done is AI so theyre just sitting in no-mans-land right now. i dont view their "AtE" as indicative of anything but genuine frustration. i guess bc i think some votes on them are scummy i'd default town

Pooky - I have no real opinion besides maintaining my lvl 1 townread on him. i'd like 2 interact more.

Sleez - i dont think ive disagreed with most anything shes said and her perspective and approach to the game is a pretty easy town for me.

Snarky Fishes - not a fan of their characterization of Medea as manipulative,,, i tend to disagree w most takes framing Medea as scum so far and this isnt exempt. meh idk overall, should probably reread their iso

Spiffeh - uhhhh lvl 1 scumread for dropping a vote and disappearing forever ago

Titus - reads like Titus. im shit at meta but somebody probably will be able 2 grasp it better then i can

my only issues with this list are a lack of conviction in a post meant to spark engagement, and the lack of any substantial scumreads. notty has a good point about the inconsistency wrt finding medea's voters scummy but having them all sorted town, but I'm not 100% sold it's AI. at the same time tho I...don't really buy 680. still need to spend more time on this slot.

In post 644, Lukewarm wrote:At this point,multiple people have called my vote some variation of opportunistic, which is wild to me.

My vote was a direct result of me calling out one of their posts and our following interactions, with a clear discussion about my concerns. If anything, I think that I included more reasonings behind my suspicions then any other vote I can think of. And I am the opportunistic vote?

is there a vote on that wagon you feel was particularly opportunistic?

In post 666, Sleez wrote:
In post 663, Snarky Fishes wrote:Well Manatee, are you caught scum?
Why are you asking this you nitwit. It's not like she's going to say yes. If your immediate response is that you're testing her reaction when she's shown to already be a very reactionary person I will send you to your grave.

this is the first sleez post I'm not a fan of but eh playstyle

In post 688, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 680, ManateeGal wrote:theres kind of a disconnect between what im saying and what im thinking often which is just frustrating bc its understandable why i get in shit for it but i don't know how to communicate how i miscommunicated. when i wrote "votes" on medea head manatee was really just thinking abt lukewarm
Exactly my vote (and subsequent unvote) was enough for you to dismiss the whole wagon as tainted, and then give your null read a town read?

In post 637, ManateeGal wrote:Medea - nullish.
-
i guess bc i think some votes on them are scummy i'd default town

In post 692, Lukewarm wrote:Like, if I make this change to match what you just said, this is what you think about Medea?
In post 637, ManateeGal wrote:Medea - nullish.
-
i guess bc i think
some

Luke's
vote on them
are

is
scummy i'd default town

In post 697, ManateeGal wrote:yes

In post 699, Lukewarm wrote:VOTE: Manatee

like i said i don't like manatee's explanation, but luke looks worse than her in this exchange. he's still lacking the initiative I expect from his town game and is playing a lot of wait-and-see.

In post 703, Spiffeh wrote:Hey how are we doing so far

not a good pop-in. like "how can I lamist in as few words as possible?", testing the waters

top of 30

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:49 pm**

oh ya bell has posted enough I'm ready to call that slot locked in now

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:53 pm**

In post 746, Lukewarm wrote:And the "I currently have too few thoughts on them to even put them in null" - aa9, lld, spiffeh, titus

how have you been approaching lld's posts?

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:57 pm**

In post 1135, Annie Edison wrote:
In post 624, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 622, Annie Edison wrote:Bell, please chill. I actually liked 611.

@LLD- what about Pooky?

[✓*]

*
In post 11, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

I refuse to believe I rolled T/T with cabd 4 games in a row cuz that'd be imba af
does this mean you think pooky is unaligned with medea?

[✓]

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:57 pm**

In post 1132, Medea the Alien wrote:
In post 1131, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 1118, Medea the Alien wrote:Not sure if fferyhead will be around due to doggo's schedule, but will try to engage after said walkies once our reads list is up.
Half an hour?
That's near the end of our time, but I'll be around to do light phoneposting chats about it.

I hate how it's shaping up to have no major controversial scumreads (well, to me anyways, you may disagree once you see it), but perhaps that's just the fate of rands these days.

Back.

The pup is writing a strongly worded letter.

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:58 pm**

In post 751, Here There Be Dragons wrote:ok yeah not much has changed for me in that last while.

i'm not impressed with medea. mostly these are things i've already mentioned. i disliked 186 quite a bit. i felt like that was an excuse for them to change the topic away from one that wasn't working for them. also looking at it again now, i feel like there are now multiple different reasons why they can't post reads. pick a lane (or just start solving). 214 bothered me as well.
i know that even if they're scum, they'll get a foothold, probably even with me, given enough time. i guess after witnessing the power of not giving scum the chance to bounce back in my game, i want to be morph even though i'm actually only okay at scumhunting which is sort of a key thing there.
i really expected them to be solving the whole ass game by now. maybe my expectations are wrong.
so, that's why i'm still voting there. it's annoying to me that the pressure has not produced much that interested me. i guess i'd like ffery, medea and/or LLD to interact with me about this and tell me if & why i'm wrong.

other concerns:
lukewarm has felt stuck out in the weeds to me all game. it doesn't remind me of his play in my game, but i could just be making this up. i'm also a little surprised he is scumreading manatee.

spiffeh's confident entrance followed by nothing, however, reminded me of my game a lot.

is this not just a straight up BoP read? is there anything else that strengthens it for you to the point of needing to be talked out of it?

why lld?

what is surprising to you about lukewarm scumreading manatee?

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:59 pm**

While penguin works on her big post, let me casually just drop our bracketed reads completely naked ITT to generate a bunch of pages worth of P-edits for her.

{Dunnstral, Lady Rhea, Sleez, Fferyllt}
{Bell, Annie Edison, Pooky}
{Save the Ceph, AA9, Titus, Spiff}
{ManateeLass}
{Luke}

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:59 pm**

In post 1138, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 1135, Annie Edison wrote:
In post 624, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 622, Annie Edison wrote:Bell, please chill. I actually liked 611.

@LLD- what about Pooky?

[✓*]

*
In post 11, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

I refuse to believe I rolled T/T with cabd 4 games in a row cuz that'd be imba af
does this mean you think pooky is unaligned with medea?

[✓]

does that go both ways? like if one flips red/green, your read of the other goes up/down respectively?

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:00 pm**

In post 1141, Medea the Alien wrote:While penguin works on her big post, let me casually just drop our bracketed reads completely naked ITT to generate a bunch of pages worth of P-edits for her.

{Dunnstral, Lady Rhea, Sleez, Fferyllt}
{Bell, Annie Edison, Pooky}
{Save the Ceph, AA9, Titus, Spiff}
{ManateeLass}
{Luke}

ugh i'm trying to READ here

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:01 pm**

In post 1142, Annie Edison wrote:
In post 1138, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 1135, Annie Edison wrote:
In post 624, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
In post 622, Annie Edison wrote:Bell, please chill. I actually liked 611.

@LLD- what about Pooky?

[✓*]

*
In post 11, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

I refuse to believe I rolled T/T with cabd 4 games in a row cuz that'd be imba af
does this mean you think pooky is unaligned with medea?

[✓]
does that go both ways? like if one flips red/green, your read of the other goes up/down respectively?

[✓X]

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:01 pm**

middle line null? @cabd

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:01 pm**

In post 1141, Medea the Alien wrote:While penguin works on her big post, let me casually just drop our bracketed reads completely naked ITT to generate a bunch of pages worth of P-edits for her.

{Dunnstral, Lady Rhea, Sleez, Fferyllt}
{Bell, Annie Edison, Pooky}
{Save the Ceph, AA9, Titus, Spiff}
{ManateeLass}
{Luke}

the hell is this hydra split?

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:02 pm**

lmaoooo

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:02 pm**

I’m pretty sure I’ve been townier then bulge why aren’t we split

Posted: **Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:03 pm**

In post 1146, Snarky Fishes wrote:
In post 1141, Medea the Alien wrote:While penguin works on her big post, let me casually just drop our bracketed reads completely naked ITT to generate a bunch of pages worth of P-edits for her.

{Dunnstral, Lady Rhea, Sleez, Fferyllt}
{Bell, Annie Edison, Pooky}
{Save the Ceph, AA9, Titus, Spiff}
{ManateeLass}
{Luke}
the hell is this hydra split?

Exactly as deserved~

Mafiascum.net

Mini 2230: Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night: Game Over