Mafiascum.net

In post 1117, Gamma Emerald wrote:

@T3 and StD

how are y’all reading each other rn?

In post 1125, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 1117, Gamma Emerald wrote:

@T3 and StD

how are y’all reading each other rn?

i think town but i'm wary

In post 1103, Roden wrote:VOTE: superbowl9

Kill all open wolves.

In post 1113, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1076, marcistar wrote:VOTE: galron
what happened to him

In post 1081, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: galron

In post 1082, T3 wrote:VOTE: galron

I’m pretty sure Galron’s one of the slots I townbinned earlier, so please don’t

In post 1113, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1076, marcistar wrote:VOTE: galron
what happened to him

In post 1081, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: galron

In post 1082, T3 wrote:VOTE: galron

I’m pretty sure Galron’s one of the slots I townbinned earlier, so please don’t

In post 1125, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 1117, Gamma Emerald wrote:

@T3 and StD

how are y’all reading each other rn?

i think town but i'm wary

In post 1126, T3 wrote:

In post 1125, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 1117, Gamma Emerald wrote:

@T3 and StD

how are y’all reading each other rn?

i think town but i'm wary

Locktown, second to Roden.

In post 1122, GrandpaMo wrote:okay hi gamma.

this post is for u

so look, what i mean by following up on posts is like look at post 157, someone answered your question and you were able to converse about them because you asked that question -- that wasn't apparent in your iso, there were way more questions not unanswered and just left open for you. like for example, what did you get out of post 248? town usually comes from a perspective where they are able to drop down most of their thoughts -- and when pressured, is able to give them. thats why i pressured you, but you decided not to follow up anything, and that made me scumread you because you kept making excuses that you were this question stating person, and u kept contradicting urself, then realized u kept hiding it because you were scared? i was right, and you admitted it. that whole thing unfort could be flagged for AtE just to make me townread you -- there is a possibility. but yea thats what following up means in my world.

In post 1109, Gamma Emerald wrote:That’s also bad
I feel like we’ve gotten a solid amount of content this day phase
Playing like the deadline is some golden rule is objectively bad play imo

In post 1114, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uggghhhh why are you such an idiot @ mafia theory
Why the hell does a wagon need to stay for several days? That just seems like a fast-track to a stagnant gamestate!

In post 113, Galron wrote:

In post 77, Titus wrote:

In post 74, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 72, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 64, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 59, Titus wrote:

In post 47, GrandpaMo wrote:this interaction is weird ngl

Hi. I'm weird.

we know

lol watch this be a breadcrumb

breadcrumb of what

Why do u care?

Titus might be a roaming loyal jailkeeper again. You never know.

Not sure what anyone's talking about but this sounds like town.

In post 1133, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1114, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uggghhhh why are you such an idiot @ mafia theory
Why the hell does a wagon need to stay for several days? That just seems like a fast-track to a stagnant gamestate!

I predict this day's discussion staying alive for at least a few more days??? If all of a sudden it becomes a ghost town your points are valid but acting like a turbolim is inevitable is kinda weird - look at the vc, Galron is tied with salsa and T3 is one behind - it's not like the entire game is at one person's throat

In post 536, Galron wrote:

In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him

I don't hardcore think he did, but I'm not tr him for it. (I know this wasn't my question but I anticipate kop answered it)

In post 594, Galron wrote:

In post 568, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 192, Galron wrote:

In post 33, marcistar wrote:

In post 18, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 16, marcistar wrote:knock knock

hi marci

wow nvm.... ignoring my knock knock joke... breaking my heart...
hi hockeyfan <3

In post 21, superbowl9 wrote:VOTE: superbowl9
saying this is scum indicative is scum indicative so watch yourselves

this is scum indicative.

Sorry I shot you marci, but glad you didn't die.

What do you mean by shot her?

Reference to a game that just ended. Found a gun, shot her and it backfired. I believe the color was "Galron shot his head off." Which as I type that out really makes me sad.

In post 1136, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1133, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1114, Gamma Emerald wrote:Uggghhhh why are you such an idiot @ mafia theory
Why the hell does a wagon need to stay for several days? That just seems like a fast-track to a stagnant gamestate!

I predict this day's discussion staying alive for at least a few more days??? If all of a sudden it becomes a ghost town your points are valid but acting like a turbolim is inevitable is kinda weird - look at the vc, Galron is tied with salsa and T3 is one behind - it's not like the entire game is at one person's throat

Maybe I’m over-reacting but it feels like we’ve had a good amount of content this game day, and I think trying for more is a recipe for disaster

In post 1123, GrandpaMo wrote:holy shit just realized i havent pay attentioned shit to this game on low activity players. going to iso some ppl later

In post 1138, HockeyFan wrote:Wagon on Galron is concerning but galron is not part of my town core so idm it. also why tf are wagons moving so fast lol. it went from gpa -> SF -> Galron. Are mafia leading these wagons or smth

In post 981, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 972, Salsabil Faria wrote:

@sb9

, I can understand why do you think softing PR from

Roden

seems scum indicative but if you think this way: yes, scums don't have day chat but

Roden

wasn’t also at E-1 or something that they had to take this risky drastic move. I don’t townread them yet, let's see what happens at night.

When did I say this? I'm not even looking at it from an alignment lens until we get the role, it's just (very probably) anti-town to soft like that. I get the town does this more often argument but to say this never comes from scum is not true

In post 983, T3 wrote:Scum me just doesn't strategize.

In post 984, superbowl9 wrote:Got an early solve salsa?

In post 1065, HockeyFan wrote:Regarding 1052

Worst Scumcase ever :^)

In post 378, Kop wrote:

In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him

I'm only saying that it could be easy to do that. I'm not saying that he did it here, but I've seen it before.

Scum impressions so far, is within Gamma, Grandpa, Titus, T3.

First scum log. Just having generally consesnus sr's is scum+ imo. Also, in this post its a bunch of fence sitting, and not comitting to a read on certain posts. For example, in this post he thinks I didnt fake townslipped but also it could very well be a fake townslip which is super ??, not really taking a stance.

In post 1065, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 896, Kop wrote:

In post 698, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

I think it buys a day, if he's alive tomorrow he hardclaims and we go from there

I can sense the reasoning behind this, but I don't like it. It feels like something that scum would be actively thinking, and are setting up the next day.

Again more fence sitting, says he can see the reasoning behind it, but still likes it ?? Says he can sense the reasoning just to say it would be smth scum would be thinking so why do u sense the reasoning behind it? negl, Kop/Superbowl interactions are super weird

In post 1065, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 373, Kop wrote:

In post 369, superbowl9 wrote:^towntell for not knowing that tho

I can see your point on it being a town tell, but could easily be scum faking that they didn't know.

AGAIN, MORE OF THE "I CAN SEE YOUR POINT" BUT IT COULD EASILLY BE "SCUM ....", like you're not willing to take hard stances on certain things which I think comes from scum+