Mafiascum.net

In post 1102, Kitty Trauma Team wrote:

In post 1101, Milobird wrote:I do have TIL on the townier side of null. I’m trying to think of how to articulate why though.

What do you think of Skrew?

the majority of Skrew's posts seem to be essentially complaining that people aren't taking the game seriously and then pushing STD

I could see Skrew being scum here

While y'all have me, I'll probably end up having to let chowchow coast to endgame regardless of their alignment, how the hell could I ever scumread that gimmick and avatar? Or townread the gimmick because it's fluffy NAIness, but that's beside the point because I can't scum read it. It's adorable. Just look at those widdle sets of eyes.

-k

In post 1106, Firebringer wrote:

In post 1087, Milobird wrote:Sorry about your Mom Kuribo.

In post 1111, mastina wrote:

In post 830, Kitty Trauma Team wrote:I can't read Mastina for shit on day one, just gonna call her town

I do have a flowchart for that, yaknow.

In post 838, Gypyx wrote:edit while reading further : yeah okay saw your answer to ralts, not a huge fan of admitting that you yourself are scummy but like i don't know how to play mafia so idk

I wasn't saying I was scummy, I was saying that I was aware that I was displaying the trait I'd expect that scum displayed but also acknowledging that I know it wouldn't be

only

scum displaying that trait.

In post 846, imaginality wrote:I don't like Gypyx and Ralts jumping on mastina's comment about the people who see TSQ v STD as TvT being more likely scum than not.

I mean on the one hand I do think Gypyx's comment absolutely sucks.

On the other hand the Gypyx wagon gives off terrible vibes and feels like it fucking sucks, with scum latching onto it.

When I'm in a better mindset (hella tired right now, just reading to stay caught up, not really capable of good critical thinking), will be able to give that better thought.

In post 868, May and Brendan wrote:

Not Voting:

The Goat, mastina

MOD:

In post 339, mastina wrote:VOTE: SirCakez

I've not changed my vote once in the game; I should be on SirCakez

.

In post 874, Thestatusquo wrote:Goats entrance feels off to me so far. Complains about pages (frequent scum tactic when they're behind and need to say something) makes vague comment about the largest wagon maybe being scummy (how would you know? Maybe because buddies are talking about it in pt?)

Valid, tho I'd like to also say SleepyKrew did fairly similar so I'd be willing to yeet either of them.

In post 1116, mastina wrote:

In post 1115, mastina wrote:

In post 1091, Kitty Trauma Team wrote:I suddenly have a million questions about her claim and how it would relate to being targeted by my own ability because I'd REALLY hate to have to be the one to NAR that

Well if you were the first/only person to target me, I'd get a copy of your ability.

Granted, I haven't asked about success vs. attempt in terms of targeting me, didn't think of it until now, will do that after submitting this post. The role PM says 'targeting', which implies it doesn't need to succeed in order for me to copy it, but not every mod is as fond of strictly adhering to semantics as I am so the wording of targeting in spite of implying success isn't needed, may still require success, so need to ask about that.

In post 1008, SirCakez wrote:I'm looking at the playerlist and honestly realizing I'd be forcing a read on like 75% of these players if I try to make a readslist
A lot of players are blending together

While I empathize with this as it's true of me, too, I still think Cakez is scum here anyway.

Fixing my broken quote here, but also adding;
I suppose I should point out that, technically speaking, my role specifies that I gain a copy of the first

move

, but I figure that every power this game is probably a move.
(I honestly didn't read the game mechanics at all, like I said, I had completely forgotten I signed up for this game in the first place. I didn't remember until I got my role PM, so. Reading game stuff just wasn't something I had as a priority.)

In post 514, SleepyKrew wrote:if you keep talking about chowchow maybe being hectic I'm going to pretend I scumread you

In post 526, SleepyKrew wrote:

In post 524, Milobird wrote:I have trained under miltank for many a year for this snark

ah yes not_mafia, the snarky scummer.


VOTE: TIL
lockscum

In post 571, SleepyKrew wrote:

In post 568, Wisdom wrote:Nancy is prolly town stop with the TIL votes

every slot is probably town. make an actual argument

In post 575, SleepyKrew wrote:yeah I'm gonna add heads talking to each other in here instead of privately as another reason for my very real scumread

In post 592, SleepyKrew wrote:wow lucky me

I'm screaming every time someone just declares a read with no explanation. No one fucking cares. Blessings and praise to those of you that are giving reasons

In post 599, SleepyKrew wrote:

In post 597, Thestatusquo wrote:

In post 592, SleepyKrew wrote:wow lucky me

I'm screaming every time someone just declares a read with no explanation. No one fucking cares. Blessings and praise to those of you that are giving reasons

how about you give some reads instead of just complaining about the others doing so?

I don't have any strong reads and tbh care more about getting to Night than trying our luck voting out scum today. The closest thing to a scumread I have is STD because I vibed with your posts and anti-vibed with his but that's not strong so I'm fine just voting for utility

In post 649, SleepyKrew wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: STD

In post 650, SleepyKrew wrote:

In post 648, Thestatusquo wrote:

In post 638, SleepyKrew wrote:shea I danced for you are you going to respond to that

sorry prolly not

damn wish I saw this before I changed my vote

In post 1063, Sharing the Brain Cell wrote:

In post 1060, Alexandrite wrote:Someone explain the brain cell scumcase because they stole that braincell from me.

Also I'd like to add that wisdom is giving scum!pings to me

- Meg

there isn't one, because a) they aren't even pretending to have a reason or b) it's just "lol tone", which is a bit like picking on the weird kid at the party for being weird and being unaware of the latest social calculus. like, thanks. we know. thanks for rubbing it in.

and knowing we get vindicated in the end when we townflip isn't really a comfort when it saps enjoyment out of the fucking game.

on that note...

@Mod: replace us. sorry, and thanks.

In post 1035, T3 wrote:

In post 992, SirCakez wrote:

In post 925, Thestatusquo wrote:Strong Town:
Milobird
chowchow

Better than mild town:
Wisdom
Kitty Trauma Team (kuribo + Malakittens)
Ralts

these reads are ridiculous lol

Cakes std mind meld?

In post 1052, Firebringer wrote:I ate too much of the brownies and now I feel like I’m gonna throw up

In post 1062, Kitty Trauma Team wrote:

In post 1013, Thestatusquo wrote:there's been so many times this game where people are like either just dismissing me by saying "player is lol town"

that's just site meta now, and it makes being town extremely frustrating when everyone is willing to go to the mats for their shitty meta townreads and then refuse to budge while the town argues for a hundred pages of zero content and then settles on an un-aliving only at the most reluctance. This has been trending on-site for at least a year or two.

I'm townreading you Shea, so pick a player (two if their isos are super light) and I'll try to deep dive them if things slow down tonight

-k

In post 1090, Milobird wrote:I have a lot of scum reads this game.

Thankfully Sircakez is easy to read today. I will be mad if he is scum this game.
and the ducks.
and maybe ralts.

-Bell

*snore*

In post 1117, Ralts wrote:

In post 1004, SirCakez wrote:i'm actually about to dump a readslist

When's this mixtape gonna drop?

In post 750, Alexandrite wrote:VOTE: gypyx
he pinged me early so I'm very down for this wagon

-Gamma

In post 1023, Alexandrite wrote:I keep seeing full read lists popping up, y’all are a bunch of sweaty tryhards

-Gamma

In post 1060, Alexandrite wrote:Someone explain the brain cell scumcase because they stole that braincell from me.

Also I'd like to add that wisdom is giving scum!pings to me

- Meg

In post 1111, mastina wrote:

I've not changed my vote once in the game; I should be on SirCakez

.

In post 738, Alexandrite wrote:do you have no thoughts on the Shea vs. Fenrir situation that happened, mala?

-Gamma

In post 743, Alexandrite wrote:anyway, you should read the combined ISO of Shea and Fenrir and give your thoughts on that at least

-Gamma

In post 1146, Wisdom wrote:

In post 738, Alexandrite wrote:do you have no thoughts on the Shea vs. Fenrir situation that happened, mala?

-Gamma

In post 743, Alexandrite wrote:anyway, you should read the combined ISO of Shea and Fenrir and give your thoughts on that at least

-Gamma

Also these encouragements for people to give content looks like town Gamma