Mafiascum.net

In post 1120, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 1094, Andante wrote:lol ok you're the 2nd one to say something, I don't see what's wrong with that statement?? When only town chose 1 (ignoring 630) there were only 2/13 games where #1 wasn't 1st draft and was still all town. Whenever scum chose #1, there was more than 1 person that chose it. 6/8 times that #1 wasn't 1st draft, it had scum. High odds to be scum! I don't understand what's wrong with this statement

It ignores the number of people who chose it. If, for example, 5 people chose 1 and one of them was scum, then there's actually better odds of hitting scum outside of the 1's than inside them.

If you add up the total number of 1's you get 6/26 are scum which is 23%, slightly higher than the baseline of 21%. So scum have a very slight inclination toward picking 1, but it's not the big effect you're making it out to be.

Even aside from that, why weren't you pushing Datisi equally?

I mean sure, if we wanted to look at total number of 1's... I was just looking at the general trend

I mean, why should I not be pushing pooky here? Datisi is alright, nothing about him is really screaming scum to me yet, Pooky has nothing game related, you're very similar to pooky, in that I think almost all of your posts have been related to this analysis stuff, I could be wrong, could be genuine posts, but it does feel like this is what the bulk of your posts have been about. oooh a pooky/Something_smart scum team though... kinda scary to think about lol

There's nothing wrong with pushing Pooky, but the number analysis isn't really damning. If it were, it would also be damning for Datisi, is my point.

In post 1126, Something_Smart wrote:There's nothing wrong with pushing Pooky, but the number analysis isn't really damning. If it were, it would also be damning for Datisi, is my point.

Yeah, I'm not really going off that, was also just like "hey fun fact! this is also a thing!" like, I don't TR pooky, you're kinda making it sound like you do? what're your thoughts on Pooky?

In post 1115, Mare wrote:Skitter's opportunistic scum. Second place in draft too.

Cakez is OMGUSing me for a bad push when he's reading Pooky the same way.

Everyone agrees your push on me is bad it's not OMGUS

In post 1115, Mare wrote:Skitter's opportunistic scum. Second place in draft too.

Cakez is OMGUSing me for a bad push when he's reading Pooky the same way.

If you don't want to vote Mare vote Pooky

In post 1064, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1019, northsidegal wrote:UNVOTE:

Thoughts on mare?

seems town

why

i'm on my phone so can't really give a super elegant case or whatever, but basically her whole convo with you and then vote on you that interaction seemed town on her end

let me get some quotes

In post 1042, Faker wrote:

In post 263, catboi wrote:[On IV's massclaim suggestion]

Doesn't "help" but the mindset is almost always town driven because scum are never going to be so bold as to suggest the idea if they believe it to be a pro-scum move, as doing so just draws negative attention to them and is unlikely to get cooperation. Way more likely to get floated by town who are trying to experiment - don't think I've ever seen scum propose it, actually. (day 1 mass is more viable in a cosed setup, in here it's pointless and bad)

Look at the motivations, not whether the suggestion is helpful/unhelpful

Can you weigh in more specifically on the fact that it was IV who suggested it? My impression of IV has been that he is in fact not the strongest mechanically, but he's got to at least have some positives in mind before suggesting it. I definitely think he is capable of doing "dumb" suggestions like that as scum hoping it will get townread for exactly that reason.

in my iso somewhere

i don’t see how wanted to talk about massclaim would get me townread that doesn’t make sense to me

I mean like all of this makes sense to me, or at least I understand her



Honestly it almost seems like a like funhouse mirror version of the conversation we were having. You're arguing that some feeling she has is nai and she's saying it isn't, sort of like what I was saying to you.

Also it's just weird to me to see you say "you're scumreading him for something nai" when she explicitly says she's talking about a feeling and not just like catching up or whatever

Also given new information about who mare is this doesn't seem to resemble what I know of her scumplay

mare wagon is bad yeah let’s find a new one

Word on the street is there is a spicy new pooky wagon that all the cool kids r going on

oh I mean if ur ok with it VOTE: pooky

lit

why is pooky asking for a wagon?

I'm a massive attention whore

and its always interesting to see who is willing to vote for you :3

I am running a platform of income equality and four day weekends

i support this

In post 1135, northsidegal wrote:Honestly it almost seems like a like funhouse mirror version of the conversation we were having. You're arguing that some feeling she has is nai and she's saying it isn't, sort of like what I was saying to you.

Also it's just weird to me to see you say "you're scumreading him for something nai" when she explicitly says she's talking about a feeling and not just like catching up or whatever

Tbf she was saying she's objecting to the content of the catchup before she moved to the vibe thing

But this is a fair perspective

In post 1141, Andante wrote:why is pooky asking for a wagon?

He is scum trying to act cool

In post 1147, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1141, Andante wrote:why is pooky asking for a wagon?

He is scum trying to act cool

What's funny is I think this is something pooky would do as both town and scum "Vote for me!!"
(but I think he's scum here)

He probably would either alignment tbh
I low key feel like he'd try more as scum tho