Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2022 5:45 pm
VC 1.20
With 13 players, it takes 7 to make a decision. Day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-04-25 00:30:00).
1) I haven’t got thereIn post 1124, humaneatingmonkey wrote:what did you think about claiming mason with FL and then retracting it as a joke when koopa uses the PR card
I don’t think FL gives 2 shits about what Koopa says to be honest, so I don’t think anything of it..In post 1124, humaneatingmonkey wrote:what did you think about claiming mason with FL and then retracting it as a joke when koopa uses the PR card
i dont think we understood each other there, ScorpiousIn post 1127, Scorpious wrote:I don’t think FL gives 2 shits about what Koopa says to be honest, so I don’t think anything of it..In post 1124, humaneatingmonkey wrote:what did you think about claiming mason with FL and then retracting it as a joke when koopa uses the PR card
please finish readingIn post 1126, MathBlade wrote:1) I haven’t got thereIn post 1124, humaneatingmonkey wrote:what did you think about claiming mason with FL and then retracting it as a joke when koopa uses the PR card
2) Claiming masons is a common joke on this site. Titus commonly calls too TRs her no thread masons.
Duh. I will finish tomorrow night. I gotta finish some stuff before work tomorrow.In post 1129, humaneatingmonkey wrote:please finish readingIn post 1126, MathBlade wrote:1) I haven’t got thereIn post 1124, humaneatingmonkey wrote:what did you think about claiming mason with FL and then retracting it as a joke when koopa uses the PR card
2) Claiming masons is a common joke on this site. Titus commonly calls too TRs her no thread masons.
...Really? You caught up on everything and didn't see posts like these?In post 1120, MathBlade wrote:I am caught up to the last post I quoted. I use it as a save spot of sorts so I can ISO myself and find it.In post 1114, Roden wrote:I think that townies generally want to know/try to gauge if someone's read on them is genuine or fabricated. Idk how much you've caught up on in the thread so far, but I've had a lot of pushback on this line of thought and I don't understand why.In post 1097, MathBlade wrote:Not sure I follow. The answer to me is not obvious.In post 1089, Roden wrote:In post 1079, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Anyone who suspects me is wrong. I want to know if theyre wrong for a reason or just bullshitting.No I actually agree with this reasoning, I just feel like I'm going fucking crazy for doubting that this would be the obvious answer.In post 1080, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Did you really have to ask that like it isnt obvious
Some people react differently to pushes.
The narrative got changed to "I'm mad emotional and egotistical" somehow and nobody seems to think this blatant manipulation is scummy.
Because I'm trying to ground myself and I trust your responses right now.In post 1098, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Roden has been playing with me for a while now I dont know why they had to ask that.
I don’t see anyone calling you mad/emotional. I know for sure I am not, I am just confused.
I agree Townies want to do this, but that doesn’t make it the obvious answer.
For example, if I was asked why I did something I’d have a response matching that situation, not something generic.
I took it literally when he said he caught up to the last post he quoted since it was somewhere in the thousands.In post 1132, humaneatingmonkey wrote:he said he hasnt caught up
If this is the post he's referring to then I'm confused. It doesn't make any sense to say "I don't see anyone calling you mad/emotional" if he's only on page 5 out of 46.In post 1073, MathBlade wrote:The annoyance isn’t the problem.In post 113, JacksonVirgo wrote:Jokes aside, this seems like genuine annoyance from Mala.
She was annoyed when Greeting crossed a line as well and she was scum.
It’s a matter of whether that’s Townie annoyance is the question.
I am caught up to here.In post 1073, MathBlade wrote:The annoyance isn’t the problem.In post 113, JacksonVirgo wrote:Jokes aside, this seems like genuine annoyance from Mala.
She was annoyed when Greeting crossed a line as well and she was scum.
It’s a matter of whether that’s Townie annoyance is the question.
That’s also not what I said. I saidIn post 1133, Roden wrote:I took it literally when he said he caught up to the last post he quoted since it was somewhere in the thousands.In post 1132, humaneatingmonkey wrote:he said he hasnt caught up
If this is the post he's referring to then I'm confused. It doesn't make any sense to say "I don't see anyone calling you mad/emotional" if he's only on page 5 out of 46.In post 1073, MathBlade wrote:The annoyance isn’t the problem.In post 113, JacksonVirgo wrote:Jokes aside, this seems like genuine annoyance from Mala.
She was annoyed when Greeting crossed a line as well and she was scum.
It’s a matter of whether that’s Townie annoyance is the question.
What? Why would being literal minded make me scum?In post 1135, MathBlade wrote:I am caught up to here.In post 1073, MathBlade wrote:The annoyance isn’t the problem.In post 113, JacksonVirgo wrote:Jokes aside, this seems like genuine annoyance from Mala.
She was annoyed when Greeting crossed a line as well and she was scum.
It’s a matter of whether that’s Townie annoyance is the question.
Which you’d know if you weren’t being extremely hyper literal.
I quote posts with my thoughts as I go along. You’ve seen me replace in and know this is my usual routine.
*stares*
Are you scum?
In post 1136, MathBlade wrote:That’s also not what I said. I saidIn post 1133, Roden wrote:I took it literally when he said he caught up to the last post he quoted since it was somewhere in the thousands.In post 1132, humaneatingmonkey wrote:he said he hasnt caught up
If this is the post he's referring to then I'm confused. It doesn't make any sense to say "I don't see anyone calling you mad/emotional" if he's only on page 5 out of 46.In post 1073, MathBlade wrote:The annoyance isn’t the problem.In post 113, JacksonVirgo wrote:Jokes aside, this seems like genuine annoyance from Mala.
She was annoyed when Greeting crossed a line as well and she was scum.
It’s a matter of whether that’s Townie annoyance is the question.Iam not calling you that.
In post 1120, MathBlade wrote: I don’t see anyone calling you mad/emotional. I know for sure I am not, I am just confused.
you're right. i am hesitant. i still scumread FL fwiw, i'm just ignoring it for now until i get the chance to really dive into the game. koopa was right about the gamestate ultimately and i have to put aside ego for while.In post 868, MalcolmTucker wrote:Human's transition on FL feels very weak and very much like a careful climbdown given where they were at before.
VOTE: Humaneatingmonkeys
who do you think is scum with malakittens in koopa's wagon?In post 1105, KittyTacky wrote:Koopa is the towniest town who ever towned and I think the wagon on them is very sus.
This is what basically says move on, evading a concrete answer.In post 813, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 809, Not Known 15 wrote:I am still waiting for an answer!In post 668, Not Known 15 wrote:Now you need to explain why you classified the roden read here as individually.In post 316, Flavor Leaf wrote:i was trying to elicit some sort of interaction with italiano, but they stone walled.In post 312, koopashell wrote:The catchup nested within spoilers is performative to me,
Fine, you convinced me.
Human/Italiano/Roden + 1 lesser active player way too early scum prediction, and also all based individually as well.
In that order for me.
Way past Roden. Don’t be dense, there was a large 1v1 between them and I even
Just catching up but I didn't do this in the way you're suggesting here Math - Koopa themselves posted that they had a role and that they had been crumbing. There is no chance whatsoever the entire mafia team would have missed it so mentioning it at all isn't problematic. The reason I'd brought it up was because Scorpious was continuing to suspect/vote for Koopa in a way that was unnatural and it gave me a sense that they'd missed the role reveal. It was important to highlight this to let us move on from what was a particularly pointless conflict.In post 1058, MathBlade wrote:This is why I suspect Malcolm. He highlighted a crumb post and called it a role claim.In post 1024, Scorpious wrote:To be fair though. I would not expect a townie to point it out..In post 1020, MalcolmTucker wrote:I've certainly not spotted any crumbing but maybe just very subtle.
Not saying either way on you just saying what I did.
This doesn’t do any good when scum could have just missed it.
Instead we have a four alarm fire going “look here”.
Can you go more in depth on the Malcolm read?
I kinda feel HEM Malcolm and Italiano are all scum but they don’t all fit together.
Didn't particularly like their admission that they'd be happy to eliminate Scorpious due to playstyle and not particularly thinking that they are mafia at all. Considering they have other suspects, felt like a way for them to potentially hedge a wagon on a townie without seeming too suspect for doing so. Also felt like Math's read on me was quite dishonest and completely distorted the truth, but aware they can sometimes quickly jump to conclusions that aren't necessarily correct while town.In post 1112, Flavor Leaf wrote:What are people’s reads on Mathblade?