Mafiascum.net

Bert you're better than that. Is this a Castle or Touhou?

In post 1139, morph the cat wrote:Meh. Experiential meta is a lot more complicated than this implies, but strongly parallel reads has been a town alignment indicator. However on one occasion where he was scum and my townpile was fucking riddled with scum (thanks, Cabd ) he was happy to "parallel" most of my reads.

So a lot of the times when our reads agree, we've both been town.

But then there was that one time where I faked it because I was scum. That's also the only scumBRO/townffery game in existence.

I don't get what point you're trying to make here.

In post 1140, mastin2 wrote:First off, the entire method of catching up is scum-oriented, in that the stream-of-consciousness posting he's doing is meant to make him look like an ignorant townie, but the simple fact of the matter is, it's fake-as-hell. He knew damn good and well what he was doing the entire time he was typing it, and bluntly, he wasn't in the dark as much as he was pretending to be. Then there's a bundle-load of bad things in the post. I'll quote them later when I have more free time available. Basically, they're convenient, they're opportunistic, they're artificial-as-hell, and overall REEK of pushing a scum agenda.

I can say things too with "reasons" that I don't substantiate so that people'll be lazy and sheep me.

AKA I'm looking forward to your "case" so I can rip it to shreds

In post 1142, pieguyn wrote:wait wtf, GP wasn't even on SSK?

In that case, I really don't like how he was saying he was suspicious of SSK

In post 529, Ghostly Penguin wrote:Did you guys just start realizing that SSK was doing fuck-all? Or did these votes exist for another reason? I approve either way.

In post 852, Ghostly Penguin wrote:

In post 821, MafiaSSK wrote:I love how people be hatin on the lurkers.

There's this new and exciting thing we call playing the game. It's all the rage with all of us who want to catch scum. And scum usually try to fake it if they don't want to get compromise policy shit lynched Day 1.

It's refreshing to see obv-scum not bother to fake it, tho', it kind of reminds me where I can always go for scum, like a going to the convenience store to get a slurpee.

this just seems like he was trying to further the wagon on SSK without actually being on there. it's another case of him not really pursuing anything and instead just commenting on it

now that I think about it more, if he's really scum trying to fake his town meta via tone/diction, it would explain where the hell that logic on me came from:

In post 853, Ghostly Penguin wrote:

In post 831, pieguyn wrote:can you explain the "play based" vs. "read based"? I don't understand what you mean here.

Mostly based on how the game is played, rather than the people contained within it. In other words, I'm not feeling the definite reads vibe from you, and considering you're not proven you're as cheeky as Mastin for example, it feels...off.

interesting, he's placing suspicion on me because I'm looking at his actions and outright ignoring his tone/diction. but this is just speculation

Ugh I better not be wrong on my Ghost read, or I'll be pissed. This makes more sense than I want it to make.

In post 1144, mastin2 wrote:(Yes. I know. I was off the wagon and pushed him as scum, too. I fully realize it makes me more suspicious. Doesn't change that I find the other player slots who've done the same thing to be any less likely to be scum. )

"Let me point out how this scummier behavior I've done is scummy so that people are less likely to find it scummy."

In post 1151, BROseidon wrote:

In post 1139, morph the cat wrote:Meh. Experiential meta is a lot more complicated than this implies, but strongly parallel reads has been a town alignment indicator. However on one occasion where he was scum and my townpile was fucking riddled with scum (thanks, Cabd ) he was happy to "parallel" most of my reads.

So a lot of the times when our reads agree, we've both been town.

But then there was that one time where I faked it because I was scum. That's also the only scumBRO/townffery game in existence.

I don't get what point you're trying to make here.

I said it's . And the more I think about it the more complicated it is.

I scumread you in Xenogears mostly for behavioral stuff, not reads.

In Death's Diner I was mostly townreading because of - get this - NY165, where I thought you were town. I have a huge pile of experiential meta now, but my original conclusions from some of that meta was bad.

If I had my read of you fully worked out in my head, I would either have my vote on you or I'd maybe be null-towning you or something. I can't see a path to "oh hell yes BRO is obvtown" given what you've put in the thread.

In post 1150, waynegg wrote:Bert you're better than that. Is this a Castle or Touhou?

What is this about?

Look at the Castle game and tell me.

What does Bert have to do with this game?

Ffery! Are you around?

In post 1158, morph the cat wrote:What does Bert have to do with this game?

Isn't Mastin Bert? Alts?

I'm trying to do a super catchup in the next 10 minutes because I didn't know how busy GiF actually was and didn't know that I would have to carry the load in this game.

In post 1160, waynegg wrote:

In post 1158, morph the cat wrote:What does Bert have to do with this game?

Isn't Mastin Bert? Alts?

fucking lol hell no

Ah.

Well,reading Mastin here was like reading Bert there. I thought they were one in the same.

In post 1159, Psychlone wrote:Ffery! Are you around?

I am now. Sup, Nacho?

In post 1165, Psychlone wrote:

Vote: mastin2

If you can sort Mastin that would be awesome. Is this on the basis of Wayne's comparison?

Why the opposition to thez lynch?

In post 1148, pieguyn wrote:well shit why not just ask him

@Varsoon:

why was SSK's reaction to the dayvig "obvtown"? and why didn't you say this before he flipped?

The rhetoric was genuine.
And I was offline that whole time, I believe. By the time I read his reaction, he'd already been dead.

Anyways,
I don't know what to think about this game.
Re-evals are necessary.

In post 1152, BROseidon wrote:AKA I'm looking forward to your "case" so I can rip it to shreds

It'll come tomorrow, most likely. Have time.

In post 1154, BROseidon wrote:"Let me point out how this scummier behavior I've done is scummy so that people are less likely to find it scummy."

Yes. Blatantly. Okay. So those aren't the words I'd use. But I explicitly said as much. Me being off the SSK wagon yet thinking he was scum was ridiculously scummy. Now, I had my reasons, yes. I simply didn't want to be on that wagon. I forget why. Probably either a fear of quickhammers or that I somehow felt him town or both, or something like that. I don't know. But those reasons are ridiculously weak and stretched, since I simply don't remember why I chose not to be on the wagon. It was a choice I made, and it's a choice that a scum-me would make.

The question you're failing to ask is if I could be town who made it and is admitting to have made it. Cheeky a scumbag I may be, I'm not cheeky of a scumbag.

Speaking of which...

In post 1165, Psychlone wrote:

Vote: mastin2

I'll be blunt:



IF you are town, Nacho, this vote is bad and you should feel bad. (BUT NOTE THAT THIS IS A BIG FREAKIN HUGE WHOPPING "IF"!) Or, put another way...
If Nacho, </3.

If GiF...fuck off.




/tomorrow. More tomorrow.

That was nacho.

In post 1141, waynegg wrote:Can we just lynch thez yet?

Still asking about thez > BRO

Says the scum...

In post 1170, mastin2 wrote:IF you are town, Nacho, this vote is bad and you should feel bad. (BUT NOTE THAT THIS IS A BIG FREAKIN HUGE WHOPPING "IF"!) Or, put another way...
If Nacho, </3.

If GiF...fuck off.

I've seen this reaction already.