Mafiascum.net

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5742688#p5742688]post 1150[/url], The Critic wrote:yeah, he's trying to direct attention away from the behavior he was engaging in

Oh look, there's more people chiming in for a lynch on me without giving reasons! Yay! You're all sooooo fucking good at mafia.

What behavior was I engaging in that I'm trying to direct attention away from, UT?

In post 1149, Eleven wrote:

In post 1144, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:UT is pushing way too fucking hard for this whole inactivity around the dan lynch thing being where we hunt

Dan wagon definitely had bussing on it and the surrounding nonvotes on the dan wagon seemed to come from a place of apathy? Yesterday ended pretty abruptly iirc (at least I remember checking the thread again and going 'wtf day is over?')

pedit: @Eleven: Uh what? Really wasn't fakeclaiming. We're effectively VT now. That's actually our role. Though you seem to be very upset about it so I don't know what to tell you. This will probably result in Faraday making this exact post at endgame:

Faraday wrote:well uh reck+grimm's role was pretty dumb and im not sure what the point was but ok?

R u upset ur gonna be lynched today????

You actually think Reck is fakeclaiming now (as opposed to just fakeclaiming Reck), Faraday? This is a turnaround from yesterday.

The wcs of lynching reck yesterday is very different from the wcs today.

Wow nice question mina except not at all and ur wrong but HEY clearly a productive use of your time

In post 54, Axxle wrote:

In post 50, ChannelDelibird wrote:

In post 33, pirate mollie wrote:VOTE: cdb

thats mina's tell not mine

I caught you with that exact phrase at the meet! It was on my list of memorable things that I submitted for this game. I guess it wasn't that memorable though.

Anyway UNVOTE: eaglekit, VOTE: ActionDan, everyone hop on, choo choo

Nah.

This is not a post I'd make if I was scum with Dan.

Eleven, it's a very productive use of my time, because I found that post if I'm interpreting it the way I think I'm interpreting it. If I'm wrong, now is when you backtrack and explain what you totally meant instead.

But ooh, go ahead. Do you want to push a lynch on us? Do it. Do it! I bet it'll DEFINITELY work!

my god the pages

we're lynching Reck today TY

In post 1156, Axxle wrote:

In post 54, Axxle wrote:

In post 50, ChannelDelibird wrote:

In post 33, pirate mollie wrote:VOTE: cdb

thats mina's tell not mine

I caught you with that exact phrase at the meet! It was on my list of memorable things that I submitted for this game. I guess it wasn't that memorable though.

Anyway UNVOTE: eaglekit, VOTE: ActionDan, everyone hop on, choo choo

Nah.

This is not a post I'd make if I was scum with Dan.

don't engage in self meta pleaseandthankyou

can we really swing a gay alien lynch today?

shotgun hammer

In post 1157, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Eleven, it's a very productive use of my time, because I found that post

scummy

if I'm interpreting it the way I think I'm interpreting it. If I'm wrong, now is when you backtrack and explain what you totally meant instead.

But ooh, go ahead. Do you want to push a lynch on us? Do it. Do it! I bet it'll DEFINITELY work!

No comment!

What you gonna doooo?

In post 1159, Untrod Tripod wrote:

In post 1156, Axxle wrote:

In post 54, Axxle wrote:

In post 50, ChannelDelibird wrote:

In post 33, pirate mollie wrote:VOTE: cdb

thats mina's tell not mine

I caught you with that exact phrase at the meet! It was on my list of memorable things that I submitted for this game. I guess it wasn't that memorable though.

Anyway UNVOTE: eaglekit, VOTE: ActionDan, everyone hop on, choo choo

Nah.

This is not a post I'd make if I was scum with Dan.

don't engage in self meta pleaseandthankyou

UT "axxle is scummy we should lynch him"
UT "axxle here's how not to be scummy"

lol my life

I actually found the self-meta kind of compelling, if it's true. I don't see Axxle posting self-conscious Nah posts.

I mean I am totally not motivated to verify it, but.

In post 1154, Iecerint wrote:The wcs of lynching reck yesterday is very different from the wcs today.

My point is that I thought Faraday was implying that it was an alignment-null fakeclaim on D1 (which is what I thought, knowing Reck). Now he's interacting with Reck in a weird backhanded way that feels less like standard Faratrolling than like leaving himself open to joining a wagon if one develops. (FTR, I reread the beginning of the game, and although I've admittedly been fooled by Reck before, I don't actually think he looks scummy here.)

Faraday, you can read us like the back of your hand. I think you should 1v1 us!

(We were actually going to vote Axxle, and I feel like a terrible person for actually being dissuaded by the self-meta post--I think there's some truth to it.)

waffle moar

Hey mina why are you softclaiming

@Iecerint: you ninja'd me, and I think it's less Axxle's meta (I know nothing whatsoever about it) than I just think scum in general are less likely to call attention to themselves like that.

@Faraday: was I that obvious? Mostly because I was planning to (at least partially) today, anyway, so I figured I might as well have some fun first.

Ooh, before I infodump, what do you think I'm softclaiming?

Axxle is pretty town and the wagon on him is trash.

No clue what you're softclaiming! I hope it's something good so your terrible play this game can be excused, though. I mean your posts over the last few pages are literally fucking atrocious, considering I was already questioning reck on actiondan yesterday so your OMG YOU FIND HIM SCUMMY is either disengenous as fuck or you literally can't read worth a damn.

The "nah" is the only thing that makes me doubt the Axxle vote. I should probably reread his lynch in the Balto game again but I am sufficiently unhappy with the rest of his posts that I'm overlooking it for now.

Other votes that I would consider today include, in no particular order, Gamma and Overlords. Also, my Eleven read decayed from 'hard town' to 'not sure' overnight.

In post 1170, Faraday wrote:Axxle is pretty town and the wagon on him is trash.

No clue what you're softclaiming! I hope it's something good so your terrible play this game can be excused, though. I mean your posts over the last few pages are literally fucking atrocious, considering I was already questioning reck on actiondan yesterday so your OMG YOU FIND HIM SCUMMY is either disengenous as fuck or you literally can't read worth a damn.

whatever omg

In post 1171, ChannelDelibird wrote:Also, my Eleven read decayed from 'hard town' to 'not sure' overnight.

okay my posts are pretty obviously fucking town and if anything the read should have gone the other way since AD wouldn't have been lynched without me BUT LOLIBUS so sure whatever.

In post 1166, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:My point is that I thought Faraday was implying that it was an alignment-null fakeclaim on D1 (which is what I thought, knowing Reck). Now he's interacting with Reck in a weird backhanded way that feels less like standard Faratrolling than like leaving himself open to joining a wagon if one develops. (FTR, I reread the beginning of the game, and although I've admittedly been fooled by Reck before, I don't actually think he looks scummy here.)

holy shit why don't you just shut the fuck up and read the game insead of being WRONG again about what my posts mean.

i quite clearly wasn't implying it was a null tell and if you ever actually thought that then i'm sorry ur not very good @ understanding my posts so sad too bad