Page 47 of 96
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:04 am
by MattP
It didn't register with me when I was considering tracking a bus driver. I don't know why, but with a bus driver it seemed much less obvious
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Matt, why'd you unvote Csareo? I thought he was a consistent scumread for you.
Because he got to L-2 with 2 votes being contingent on your associational tell that is wrong, and I believe that is a sign of a mislynch. I believe that MafiaSSK or vezok is most likely scum given the ease of their jumps onto the csareo wagon and willingness to believe your theory (mafiassk prior to even hearing it and acting as if he clearly saw it himself with no context provided)
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:10 am
by Anatole Kuragin
So essentially you're ignoring your own read and the rest of my case on Csareo because I said there's a good chance you are a scum team and other people agreed.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:17 am
by MattP
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:So essentially you're ignoring your own read and the rest of my case on Csareo because I said there's a good chance you are a scum team and other people agreed.
No? So essentially I'm ignoring my own read because we are presumably 1 lynch away from lylo, there are probably 3 scum and 7 town, and I believe the ease of those two players jumping onto csareo contingent on your case is so outlandishly ridiculous that I believe it's idiotic to
A) leave him at L-2 this early
B) believe the growth of the wagon is town-motivated
But go ahead and believe that
entirely preposterous
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:25 am
by xRECKONERx
↑ vezokpiraka wrote:NAR has a golden rule and after that in order to resolve conflicts you use the list to resolve them.
When I mod, I resolve in the order of the NAR.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:27 am
by Anatole Kuragin
WHAT?
ENTIRELY PREPOSTEROUS WHAT
?
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:28 am
by MattP
Is that a question you want me to answer?
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:29 am
by Anatole Kuragin
Yes, that is what those punctuation marks indicate.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:35 am
by vezokpiraka
↑ xRECKONERx wrote: ↑ vezokpiraka wrote:NAR has a golden rule and after that in order to resolve conflicts you use the list to resolve them.
When I mod, I resolve in the order of the NAR.
Then you are resolving abilities based on a list and not on NAR. We had the same talk in mean girls.
Also is anyone else seeing how mattp is subtly dicrediting ak and defending csareo.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:35 am
by MattP
Lel
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:37 am
by MattP
Matt: I don't think we should vote Csareo currently, and I'm town, you're wrong Anatole!
Vezok: Shhh... guys, come in closely and observe, Matt is
subtly
discrediting ak and defending csareo
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:39 am
by Anatole Kuragin
I think it looks pretty fishy how you are doing a complete 180 on your read now that other people agree Csar is scum.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:41 am
by MattP
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:I think it looks pretty fishy how you are doing a complete 180 on your read now that other people agree Csar is scum.
First off, on principle, when people agree with my read and actually vote said read I more often than not flip my vote which is even evident multiple times in this very game (because I generally experience paranoia of believing I'm being manipulated). Second off, when an incorrect associational tell is contigent on multiple people's votes of said player, and their jumps onto the wagon are in poor form (especially MafiaSSK's), I become more paranoid that my read is incorrect and jump off of said player
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:54 am
by Anatole Kuragin
I mean, the association is just icing on the cake. His attitude towards you is really weird and noncommittal regardless of you requiting his scumminess. And he also totally scumslipped yesterday anyways.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:54 am
by MattP
How did he scumslip?
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:55 am
by MattP
I'll just read your posts in more detail!
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:55 am
by Anatole Kuragin
dude i've quoted it like four times already
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:56 am
by Anatole Kuragin
I think you even said it was the scummiest thing from yesterday
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:56 am
by Anatole Kuragin
↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote: ↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote: ↑ Csareo wrote:Look up guys
There is a dumbass in our midst, and he's here to troll
I would not mind policy lynching this asshole. He'll say stupid shit that will get him scum read and we'll spend 5 pages arguing about whether that is just his meta.
I can confirm that flubber's meta is to act like a douchebag.
↑ Csareo wrote: ↑ Ki-Gi wrote:You answered the first question with the second question (and all your other posts).
Don't ive me that bullshit. Everyone knows that "policy lynch" talk is "scum convincing townies to lynch townies" talk
A) Supports a policy lynch on a player for past games
B) flat out says policy lynches are straight up scum playz
Slip, miscalculation, etc.
Vote this guy.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:56 am
by T S O
anatole too is town
can we vote vezok pls
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:57 am
by MattP
Yeah, that sucks anatole, you're right
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 10:01 am
by Anatole Kuragin
and dear lord that's such a shitty gif choice
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 10:02 am
by MattP
Not everyone can have your refined aesthetic taste
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 10:03 am
by T S O
let's quit the bitching and vote vezok
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 10:11 am
by vezokpiraka
↑ T S O wrote:let's quit the bitching and vote vezok
Your reads are bad and you should feel bad.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 10:12 am
by T S O
no