Page 47 of 182
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:08 pm
by eyestott
↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:You missed a question from one of our heads!
but, there are other things to do with a scum-read other than to try and get them lynched just like there are other things you can do with a vote other than to get them lynched. There is also zero reason to try to explain the reason why one thinks a person is scum to said scum read
Well, if said scum read is borne out of a misunderstanding, explaining the scumread can clear it up. Arent votes used to lynch?
I suppose I just find it frustrating when someone won't explain reasoning when it negatively impacts me.
P.edit: crap, I forgot about that question. Now, I'm gonna be out for about 10 hours (I'm doing Christmas shopping, then going to an 18th), but I'll try to respond when I get home. Sorry.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:10 pm
by eyestott
↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote: ↑ eyestott wrote:
What protown reason is there to vote someone and actively give no explanation. If you're town, you must think im scum, and should therefore be trying to get me lynched. However, a naked vote will not achieve that.
So, why the vote?
A naved vote brings you closer to a lynch the same as a vote with reasons behind it. A naved vote is me letting you vnow that I'm watching you, and me letting you vnow that I thinv you have the best chance of being scum out of anyone here: if votes only meant "I am ready for this lynch now" I would vote a lot less than I do now. Why didn't you respond to my question re: updated antihero read?
It doesn't really bring me closer to a lynch, as you're not trying to get other people to vote for me, your top scumread.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:12 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote:I'm doing Christmas shopping
I'm calling bullshit
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:13 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
First a small point, then a response:
If naked voting doesn't push you closer to a lynch, why does it negatively impact you?
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:14 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
what's an 18th?
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:17 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote: ↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote: ↑ eyestott wrote:
What protown reason is there to vote someone and actively give no explanation. If you're town, you must think im scum, and should therefore be trying to get me lynched. However, a naked vote will not achieve that.
So, why the vote?
A naved vote brings you closer to a lynch the same as a vote with reasons behind it. A naved vote is me letting you vnow that I'm watching you, and me letting you vnow that I thinv you have the best chance of being scum out of anyone here: if votes only meant "I am ready for this lynch now" I would vote a lot less than I do now. Why didn't you respond to my question re: updated antihero read?
It doesn't really bring me closer to a lynch, as you're not trying to get other people to vote for me, your top scumread.
What we are doing now is attempting to solidify a read on you: generally campaigning for a lynch comes after you're at least somewhat sure of it. Also on the flip side, what's the scum motivation of putting a vote on you if we aren't trying to get you lynched with it?
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:17 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
I'm guessing 18th birthday party. Today someone is a MAN
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:17 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
Or woMAN
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:27 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ yoncé wrote:I also don't know who's scum, but I doubt it's Boonskiies! Too easy.
Ankamius is my best guess for scum right now. I don't know. His non-reaction to the votes on him is a null tell to some, but to me it reads scummy. I feel like town would have a more active reaction to being voted by someone they just attacked. Maybe scum trying not to say OMGUS? Hm.
Why is Boonsviies "too easy"?
Are you familiar with Ank's meta?
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:27 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
guys look SleepyVrew is contributing now
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:28 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
holy fucv Mara I understand that I missed a v
You don't need to deafen my right ear
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:28 pm
by eyestott
jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote: ↑ eyestott wrote:I'm doing Christmas shopping
I'm calling bullshit
So I need to take a picture of the presents after I buy them?
jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:First a small point, then a response:
If naked voting doesn't push you closer to a lynch, why does it negatively impact you?
Negatively affects me in a psychological way. Someone is scumreading me and I have no idea why.
jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote:what's an 18th?
An 18th birthday party of a close friend.
jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote: ↑ eyestott wrote: ↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote: ↑ eyestott wrote:
What protown reason is there to vote someone and actively give no explanation. If you're town, you must think im scum, and should therefore be trying to get me lynched. However, a naked vote will not achieve that.
So, why the vote?
A naved vote brings you closer to a lynch the same as a vote with reasons behind it. A naved vote is me letting you vnow that I'm watching you, and me letting you vnow that I thinv you have the best chance of being scum out of anyone here: if votes only meant "I am ready for this lynch now" I would vote a lot less than I do now. Why didn't you respond to my question re: updated antihero read?
It doesn't really bring me closer to a lynch, as you're not trying to get other people to vote for me, your top scumread.
What we are doing now is attempting to solidify a read on you: generally campaigning for a lynch comes after you're at least somewhat sure of it. Also on the flip side, what's the scum motivation of putting a vote on you if we aren't trying to get you lynched with it?
I didn't actually think of it like that. I don't know the scum motivation. But the town motivation makes some sort of sense, except for this:
If you aren't even somewhat sure of me being scum, why am I your top scumread?
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:30 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote:So I need to take a picture of the presents after I buy them?
I'd still call bullshit. Way too early for Christmas shopping.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:31 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote:Negatively affects me in a psychological way. Someone is scumreading me and I have no idea why.
Why does being scumread affect you?
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:33 pm
by eyestott
↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote: ↑ eyestott wrote:Negatively affects me in a psychological way. Someone is scumreading me and I have no idea why.
Why does being scumread affect you?
Because I know they're wrong, and there's nothing I can do to convince you otherwise.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:33 pm
by eyestott
Otherwise meaning convince you that I'm town.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:34 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ eyestott wrote: ↑ jesusbuddhavrishnathebest wrote: ↑ eyestott wrote:Negatively affects me in a psychological way. Someone is scumreading me and I have no idea why.
Why does being scumread affect you?
Because I know they're wrong, and there's nothing I can do to convince you otherwise.
But why would you want to waste time and energy convincing just one person that they're wrong when you could be scumhunting instead?
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:34 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
Right now it seems like you're more concerned about your own survival than lynching scum.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:45 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
"Negatively affects me in a psychological way" - exactly. If you're scum, we are putting you in a remarkably awkward position of us being right about you being scum and you having no idea why, which increases your likelihood of slipping up. As town, putting you on edge also usually makes you easier to read because you're more likely to just nervously/honestly ramble about things.
You're a not particularly strong scumread 1) because I haven't read most of the game and don't have a whole lot of strong reads at the moment. I didn't like your early game posting because never really came out of your shell and gave any stances that would be a risk for you as scum. I like the angle you're taking at the moment, but I'm far more interested in the Antihero/reads conversation we are going to have down the line.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:26 pm
by serrapaladin
Boy am I tempted to vote the three headed hydra of death. Going after eyestott is weaksauce.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:29 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
and I feel like, despite having just replaced in, we've done a considerable amount more than you have.
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:36 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
why
can't
eyestott be scum?
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:13 pm
by Egg
Holy fuck stop spamming
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:36 pm
by jesusbuddhavrishnathebest
↑ Egg wrote:Holy fuck stop spamming
This is the scummiest post I've ever hyperbolized about.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Egg
You can yell at me later, Nacho.
You please don't yell at me, Mara.
-bork
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2014 5:40 pm
by Bulbazak