Posted: Sun Oct 20, 2019 9:42 am
VOTE: Sujimuchi
Would you prefer that I lie? Pointing out one thing and saying “pretty agreeful” seems disingenuous and reaching for a reason.In post 1149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Seems awfully agreeful
It’s bad town if you are town. Otherwise it’s scum. I haven’t formed enough of an opinion and am not making a push on your slot, so this is again reaching for a reason.In post 1149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:That’s just called bad town. Seems to me that your trying to form a misslynch
Providing reasons and rationale is what let’s us move beyond personality/meta arguments. I don’t understand this or the following quote.In post 1149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Providing reasons is Null as personality isn’t Alignment Indicative. Are you saying he’s projecting himself to look bad?
See above. Your entire “evaluation” of me and Joey seems to be disingenuous posting that you posit supports your vote on me (the counterwagon the PMysterious). You did not come to a conclusion based on the information, rather you looked for information and reasoning to support a pre-determined conclusion. There is a high likelihood that you and PM are partners at this point.In post 1149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Didn’t like responses?
What’s you with Responses and Reasoning being alignment indicative?
I didn’t even check to see who the top wagon were TBH.In post 1151, Sujimichi wrote:Would you prefer that I lie? Pointing out one thing and saying “pretty agreeful” seems disingenuous and reaching for a reason.In post 1149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Seems awfully agreeful
It’s bad town if you are town. Otherwise it’s scum. I haven’t formed enough of an opinion and am not making a push on your slot, so this is again reaching for a reason.In post 1149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:That’s just called bad town. Seems to me that your trying to form a misslynch
Providing reasons and rationale is what let’s us move beyond personality/meta arguments. I don’t understand this or the following quote.In post 1149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Providing reasons is Null as personality isn’t Alignment Indicative. Are you saying he’s projecting himself to look bad?
See above. Your entire “evaluation” of me and Joey seems to be disingenuous posting that you posit supports your vote on me (the counterwagon the PMysterious). You did not come to a conclusion based on the information, rather you looked for information and reasoning to support a pre-determined conclusion. There is a high likelihood that you and PM are partners at this point.In post 1149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Didn’t like responses?
What’s you with Responses and Reasoning being alignment indicative?
In post 929, Sujimichi wrote:From my initial stance on PM, the below spoilered posts have reinforced my scum read. In post 819 and 823, PM's response to me is throwing shade at me trying to paint the Titus wagon as a bad wagon, and highlight the Norwegianboy wagon (same amount of votes, don't force people) as a viable alternative. Post 895 is basically PM saying they are okay with whatever and don't really have a stance (I'm fine with Titus if the majority want it), despite them asserting I am scum if Titus flips town.In post 923, Joey_ wrote:@awoo & suji; can you explain your PM read?
Spoiler:
Absolutely not. I did not think that with Creature's initial vote. See my post above. I think that now because "You did not come to a conclusion based on the information, rather you looked for information and reasoning to support a pre-determined conclusion. There is a high likelihood that you and PM are partners at this point."In post 1156, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Also to confirm.
You saying that my slot voting you means me and PM are buddies?
In post 1157, Sujimichi wrote:Absolutely not. I did not think that with Creature's initial vote. See my post above. I think that now because "You did not come to a conclusion based on the information, rather you looked for information and reasoning to support a pre-determined conclusion. There is a high likelihood that you and PM are partners at this point."In post 1156, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Also to confirm.
You saying that my slot voting you means me and PM are buddies?
I find it doubtful you didn't know the leading wagons at the time as well as that you only chose me (counterwagon to leading wagon at the time) and one other player to ISO based on one post from Titus. It feels engineered with a purpose.
Not a post.In post 1160, Sujimichi wrote:Quick question before I engage further: Do you really think that I am scum reading PM for one post?
Then you haven't actually read my reasoning. I'm not going to engage with you futher until others have had a chance to as I don't believe you are engaging to understand my alignment.In post 1161, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Not a post.In post 1160, Sujimichi wrote:Quick question before I engage further: Do you really think that I am scum reading PM for one post?
But the fact you believe he did something that appeared scummy but with my experience is actually just Null.
I said previously:In post 1162, Sujimichi wrote:Then you haven't actually read my reasoning. I'm not going to engage with you futher until others have had a chance to as I don't believe you are engaging to understand my alignment.In post 1161, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Not a post.In post 1160, Sujimichi wrote:Quick question before I engage further: Do you really think that I am scum reading PM for one post?
But the fact you believe he did something that appeared scummy but with my experience is actually just Null.
I've already answered this. Not knowing PMysterious' alignment as a certainty is why I am not pressing it.In post 1164, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:So because someone changes their vote to you they are auto suspect for Mafia team with PM? Despite us not even knowing if PM will actually flip Mafia or not.
You need to read how Day 1 and the Nomination 1 phases actually went. I will specifically note the parties chosen.In post 1164, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Chances are at this point Mafia has a high chance to buss themselves to actually win the game.
Suji’s slot looks obvious town with this classic distance-half-shade, classic TvsSIn post 68, Titus wrote:Yeah no.In post 66, Donempire wrote:36 is a joke vote, still in rvs. People that seem to be wagoning him based on that dont should reconsider.
I think you're town but you give scum far too much credit. 36 is pretty scummy. I'd be pretty fucking surprised if mutant flipped town.
Dong’s answer + Titus is also pretty TvsS; Titus decides to talk in 3rd person because she don’t want to escalade the confrontation, but she does so while shading Dong & giving herself an out if she eventually ends up needing to push/scumread DongIn post 102, Titus wrote:In post 100, Donempire wrote:What are you talking about? I dont scumread mutant over it, so im asking you to clarify. Since you are so stubbornly not doing that, i am defending him, yes.In post 94, pisskop wrote:The exact point of RVS is to use exaggerated cases to push and use the content generated to make real cases. So why isnt that happening right here? Is it because youre too busy trying to defend mutant? is it because you stepped up to the plate to stifle conversation and take away that from everyone else?
I'll listen to your point of view if you explain it, right now all i can gather from this is that you scumread mutant over a rvs vote, if you want me to take your side i will, provided you actually convince me on that.
I'm not sure whether dong is trying to portray himself as reasonable here or if he really is uncertain. It's not about being correct, even though I think we are. It's about using pressure to sort people and get wagons going.
Right now, there's too much emphasis on who is wrong rather than. Let's try this.
Titus tries to convince Dong w/ “what should a good townie should do” which is pretty non confrontational and scum would only think about using this angle to convince mind you.In post 106, Titus wrote:That's because mutant's acts are scummy. It's not just pressure for pressure's sake. Even if I am reading it wrong, standing and attacking before any wagon gets three votes stops town from coalescing.In post 105, Donempire wrote:I posted 83 in an attempt to pressure mutant from a position i felt comfortable in, because i realized that the position pk is taking is so ludicrous that i figured he was pressuring for pressures sake, yet i didnt want to jump in just because. Thats why i dont understand he is opposing me so much here.
Unless you got a mod guilty, you shouldn't do that but RVS elsewhere instead.