Mafiascum.net

Sucks to suck but when my townreads aren't looking to pair with my townreads I have to be more active.

In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.

*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.

Like 6 if you said hey 7 wanna hang id say yes, you and three are my preferences really, but that’s not how that happened.

In post 1150, Lady 3 wrote:Sucks to suck but when my townreads aren't looking to pair with my townreads I have to be more active.

I think its coming off wrong though.

Like i said, looks bad, like trying to fit round pegs in square poles

In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.

*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.

Scumposting

In post 1136, Gentleman 5 wrote:L6, my mistress.

Have thoughts on L8 and L9?

Please dont miss this L6 please

In post 1136, Gentleman 5 wrote:L6, my mistress.

Have thoughts on L8 and L9?

Lady 8 is a nullread. I don't see how partnering on G2 would be a nullread then she had the weird townslip posts. Her posts just don't make sense for either alignment. Gun to my head, town. You could use the same observations and reach scum.

Lady 9 is one of my favorite ladies. I think G2 picked a fellow townie. Part of me says shading her is better strategy but I am not good at deceit to trick scum without knowing the real usernames.

In post 1154, Lady 4 wrote:

In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.

*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.

Scumposting

Case in point.

Actually, I dunno if L6 is scum.

In post 1158, Gentleman 6 wrote:Actually, I dunno if L6 is scum.

^

L5 and L8 deserve to die before L6 imo.

I can dig this chicks vibe. Not sold on town, but Ill play.

In 1156 the second "nullread" should say boring. I got distracted while drafting.

In post 1154, Lady 4 wrote:

In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.

*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.

Scumposting

AtE yes. Aggressive yes. Buddying yes

Scumposting? Im not seeing it, my herbivore friend.

The Lady 8 scum reads don't make sense to me.

I also don't think that forgiving Lady 6 just because she plays like she's got binoculars glued to her eyes is the best course of action either. Too scummy to be scum is rarely an argument, I think.

In post 1159, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1158, Gentleman 6 wrote:Actually, I dunno if L6 is scum.

^

L5 and L8 deserve to die before L6 imo.

I can dig this chicks vibe. Not sold on town, but Ill play.

I don't think Lady 8 should die. I think Lady 3-5 and G4 have at least 2 scum.

If I had to guess the last scum, it would be G1 or G8 although I would want it to be G6 because he was an ass earlier.

In post 1157, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1154, Lady 4 wrote:

In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.

*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.

Scumposting

Case in point.

So L6 I’m pretty sure that g3 is responding to something about me not you.

I think reactionary is probably a better word than aggressive. The latter implies proactive play.

In post 1162, Gentleman 4 wrote:The Lady 8 scum reads don't make sense to me.

I also don't think that forgiving Lady 6 just because she plays like she's got binoculars glued to her eyes is the best course of action either. Too scummy to be scum is rarely an argument, I think.

Interesting. A direct potshot but a potshot none the less.

What does binoculars glued to my face mean? Why is that scummy?

Who are your scumreads?

In post 1164, Lady 7 wrote:

In post 1157, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1154, Lady 4 wrote:

In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.

*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.

Scumposting

Case in point.

So L6 I’m pretty sure that g3 is responding to something about me not you.

Given G4's later replies to me and his lack of correction, I disagree.

No one has called you arrogant, Lady 6.

Where was Gentleman 6 an ass?

In post 1162, Gentleman 4 wrote:The Lady 8 scum reads don't make sense to me.

I also don't think that forgiving Lady 6 just because she plays like she's got binoculars glued to her eyes is the best course of action either. Too scummy to be scum is rarely an argument, I think.

Ill go into it more if she ends up at the dance.

Tunnel Vision is usually a town issue. I take more issue with L3’s commanding than I do L6 at this time, but...

Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1159, Gentleman 5 wrote:

In post 1158, Gentleman 6 wrote:Actually, I dunno if L6 is scum.

^

L5 and L8 deserve to die before L6 imo.

I can dig this chicks vibe. Not sold on town, but Ill play.

I don't think Lady 8 should die. I think Lady 3-5 and G4 have at least 2 scum.

If I had to guess the last scum, it would be G1 or G8 although I would want it to be G6 because he was an ass earlier.

Nopenopenopenopenopenope. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200. You lost me.

That said, the post above seems townie though, as I feel those reads are reactionary rather than actual reads imo.

In post 1165, Gentleman 4 wrote:I think reactionary is probably a better word than aggressive. The latter implies proactive play.

So, you don't think me asking to be partners with G3 or G5 is proactive? You don't think me suggesting who scum are is initiative taking? You don't think giving suggestions to improve the thread is proactive? You don't think calling attention to myself when I can be here is proactive?

Just what is your standard for proactive?

In post 1166, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1162, Gentleman 4 wrote:The Lady 8 scum reads don't make sense to me.

I also don't think that forgiving Lady 6 just because she plays like she's got binoculars glued to her eyes is the best course of action either. Too scummy to be scum is rarely an argument, I think.

Interesting. A direct potshot but a potshot none the less.

What does binoculars glued to my face mean? Why is that scummy?

Who are your scumreads?

Given the definition of potshot, that isn't a potshot.

I'm aware the implication is that your lack of self-awareness and awareness of the game is scummy, but that wasn't necessarily my intention.

In post 1167, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1164, Lady 7 wrote:

In post 1157, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1154, Lady 4 wrote:

In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.

*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.

Scumposting

Case in point.

So L6 I’m pretty sure that g3 is responding to something about me not you.

Given G4's later replies to me and his lack of correction, I disagree.

I highly recommend you read Gentleman 3's post and it's context, then, because I'm almost certain it will prove otherwise.

In post 1168, Gentleman 4 wrote:No one has called you arrogant, Lady 6.

Where was Gentleman 6 an ass?

The dude is/was going to death tunnel me if I danced with L5.

Not an ass, but rood.

In post 1167, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1164, Lady 7 wrote:

In post 1157, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1154, Lady 4 wrote:

In post 1151, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 1144, Gentleman 3 wrote:If that's a setup for a future push it's the shittiest, bluntest one I've ever seen.

*shrug* Figures that the slots I suggest have wierd posts call me arrogant and use general labels such as "scumposting" rather than reply to my observations or request clarification (like gentleman 5 does). This is particularly useful since you only wanted to use a widely accepted dance pairing.

Scumposting

Case in point.

So L6 I’m pretty sure that g3 is responding to something about me not you.

Given G4's later replies to me and his lack of correction, I disagree.

Maybe I’m missing something but I thought G3’s original post you responded to was a response to g6 getting concerned about something I said. I don’t think he’s been back in the thread since that.

In post 1168, Gentleman 4 wrote:No one has called you arrogant, Lady 6.

Where was Gentleman 6 an ass?

What G5 said. I'm not in the mood for semantics. Someone said I was arrogant or full of myself. I'm not exactly going to find it.

I understand you disagree G5. I really hope L8 ends up at the dance so we can sort it out. I think most of the scum will soon be at the dance though anyway.