Ok i looked at aldu's iso again
And while i dont agree with a lot of his takes he feels good tonewise
So not super interested in him rn
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:59 pm
by skitter30
VOTE: quag
I'm going to start here i think
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 12:59 pm
by Captain the Furret
Ok
I’m fine with ruling out George and noms as well as aldusk and noms
Leaves us back to where we started with looker, Quag, and chemist.
Pedit: The biggest thing I see in aldusk is I feel like he is trying to sort people
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:00 pm
by Captain the Furret
Honestly
I kind of just think Quag concedes if he’s scum here.
Like, he came into the day really defeated. More times then not demoralized town or scum. I’ve been there before.
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:01 pm
by skitter30
Yeah like his takes are kinda wild but i can kinda tell he's thought about them, even if not like in the conventional way, if that makes sense
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:02 pm
by skitter30
Aldu ^
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:02 pm
by Captain the Furret
Like, I don’t think thats what scum does here
I think in general he’s just been in a very unlucky position this game
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:03 pm
by skitter30
In post 1153, Captain the Furret wrote:Honestly
I kind of just think Quag concedes if he’s scum here.
Like, he came into the day really defeated. More times then not demoralized town or scum. I’ve been there before.
Yeah ... i felt the defeatism too
Like aldu's entrance kinda had a similar message to quag's but the tone was super different
Not sure if he just concedes here; most scum at least try to put up a fight ime
But, seriously, though
S{Quag | Heaven/Nom | Aldus/Skitter/Menal | Captain/Luca}T
okay you know what
this read on me is just tmi VOTE: looker
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:10 pm
by Chemist1422
In post 1147, Captain the Furret wrote:I think I want to rule out George and Noms
If we’re going by the map Chemist posted, Mena really never had a solid stance on noms and I feel like scum!mena has a more solidified stance on noms
for like a decent half of the day it was "noms is TWTBAW"
But, seriously, though
S{Quag | Heaven/Nom | Aldus/Skitter/Menal | Captain/Luca}T
ok you know what
this read on me is tmi VOTE: looker
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:11 pm
by Chemist1422
also I don't think it's fair to say I danced around the noms wagon when I was against it all day
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:12 pm
by Captain the Furret
I don't need a map to tell me that Looker having me as his top townread along with luca is weird
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:15 pm
by Captain the Furret
In post 258, Looker wrote:You were literally scum both times and you played just like this. All that's left is for you to get pissed and replace out. Then I'll know for sure you're scum.
In post 259, nomnomnom wrote:I replaced out of that game because you insulted me personally and I am not dealing with personal insults in mafia games
my tone is NAI and anyone that has played with me for a significant amount of time knows this
you townread me in our last micro so clearly you do not have a correct grasp of my town and scumgame
I didn't insult you: I said you come off as scum because of your tone. You're deflecting.
But I lynched you the first time, so shouldn't that cancel out?
In post 260, nomnomnom wrote:I feel insulted that you'd imply that I would replace out as scum just because I am scumread because I have plenty of examples of the contrary
you are not hot shit, every single game you've played with me you've placed your vote on me early on d1 because of stuff that isn't even game related and you have the nerve to say you know how I am and what kind of game I play
educate yourself and read some of my past games, thank you
You have a track record with sarcasm
"Every single game" is exaggerative. I voted you one game at start and you were scum in it. I didn't even vote you this game.
Researching you isn't "educational", nom
In post 261, nomnomnom wrote:like the worst in all this is that you're probably town considering this is what you do every single game and you seem to have a massive ego that seems attached to your towngame
Again, exaggerative. Also, ego?
In post 262, nomnomnom wrote:I have a little theory you're ultra mad from that micro still and this is why you're voting me here lmao
I assume these spam posts are because you stewed over this? I have to conclude that this is theater because this is a game. You weaving this inauthentic narrative is a strategy. We both know you're nowhere near important enough to be mad over. Especially "ultra" mad, whatever that is.
skitter30 standing V/LA Fridays and Saturdays & mental health V/LA.
Luca Blight V/LA weekend.
[/area]
oh
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:19 pm
by Captain the Furret
Skitter
question
what townie posts 258 and interacts with noms the way they do in 376 AND unvotes noms, which is right after 375 which is a votecount saying that Noms is at L-1
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:38 pm
by skitter30
Looker why the unvote there ?
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:41 pm
by GeorgeBailey
So he unvoted when the wagon got too hot? Sounds good to me.
VOTE: Looker
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:50 pm
by Captain the Furret
UNVOTE:
No offense, but while that looks odd to me, I don’t want my vote in play when I’m not ready to end the day
It depends on who was on it. If someone I suspect hops on a wagon I'm on, I leave it. My lynches are typically a compromise of townreads.
@Furretlisae
How is a townread TMI? At what point does it just become paranoia on your part? Or theater?
Also, again: My reads are a summation of everyone's actions - the entire gamestate; not just some scumtells you picked up from the wiki.
I sometimes vote less vocal players so that they have to be readable in subsequent days. Heaven was probably lurking. Also, I think Luca claimed somewhere in there. Something happened to change my view of that wagon.
VOTE: GeorgeBailey
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 3:09 pm
by Captain the Furret
I find it hard to believe you can come to the conclusion that I am a top tier townread that early