In post 1145, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have not been using any of their posts to read them because all the posts they have made that I am aware of does not seem to determine their alignment.
What reads do you ACTUALLY have then.
Right now, I have yet to find a single real read. I'm still asking questions in a bid to get a read.
Surprised you dont have a read of me in either direction considering how much I've posted. What are you doing to find those reads then if you've been asking questions and gaining nothing.
yeah btw if ur asking questions that aren't helping u form reads. U need to rethink out ur questions or at least think about how u expect town/scum answers to ur questions would go and compare it to what u get.
In post 910, Firebringer wrote:i don't think his reads make sense with what he has posted. His posts look more like he is trying to look like he is doing something.
look at his progression on sakura and see what i mean.
I don't see what you mean. Isn't it possible for someone to have this thought progression?
Firebringer, isn't it possible for someone to have this thought progression?
Firebringer, isn't it possible for someone to have this thought progression?
unless ur ally is persivul. I don't see how u could have.
He is voting on the same wagon as a player he reads as scum based upon a read shift in D1 to a player he thinks is town. What the hell does persivul have to do with it?
In post 882, NorwegianboyEE wrote:When people understand that meta can be used in a symbiotic relationship with all other scum hunting tools, only then will we reach true nirvana in this imperfect society.
Then drop the wall then
In post 890, Firebringer wrote:
Drew is...interesting. I liked how he stood by his earlier position of "i don't have reads" and could have easily given out fake ass reads then and there to placate people and didn't. I think his push on u is kind of stupid when I see more reason for him to push Sakura. Even though I disagree with both of his reads. I could see him being scum but i really like his push against being dominated by anyone right now. I like that kind of attitude.
He doesn't actually have good reads at all. I want a list out of him almost at this point. He does not seem to be firmly comitted to his vote either. His wall had nothing really about it, which is very odd. Considering if you are going to place a vote after catching up, justifying it would be the thing to do, instead of giving so after it was placed.
In post 896, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Ohhh i think i finally get it.
So Drew's got it in his head that Sakura is scum, and they view my supposed "defense" of Sakura by attacking FB as a indirect defense of Sakura. Even though i was actually attacking FB because i saw their TR of Sakura as a pocketing attempt. So they either misunderstood or misrepresented my post to suit this narrative. Am i right?
Yes.
I think I fucked up what I was trying to say. See my 730 and 731 for the technicals of what I called a "chainsaw".
In post 1140, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:CooLDoG, I was messing around in those few posts. You know as well as I do that those two players (NorwegianboyEE and Firebringer) are not taking this game very seriously, so, I didn't when I was engaging with them.
But Norwegian and fire both seem to actually be playing the game. That's part of my VOTE: unvote
I have not been using any of their posts to read them because all the posts they have made that I am aware of does not seem to determine their alignment.
In post 1145, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have not been using any of their posts to read them because all the posts they have made that I am aware of does not seem to determine their alignment.
In post 1145, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:I have not been using any of their posts to read them because all the posts they have made that I am aware of does not seem to determine their alignment.
What reads do you ACTUALLY have then.
Right now, I have yet to find a single real read. I'm still asking questions in a bid to get a read.
go through someones iso right now.
Try to put urself in their shoes. And read it as though u are them and think about how they are thinking/doing. Go through them and see if the posts make sense with the train of thought uve been following.
I never understood why sometimes people quote things they arent meant to, never happened to me asides from misclicking. Does it have to do with multiquote? coz i never use that.
That's true. Unfortunately, I have no idea what I could possibly ask that will help me determine your alignment.
at least u didn't ask me if i was town. I would have had to say no, otherwise my honesty streak ends.
Since you've been claiming to be scum, I'll just treat you as such.
VOTE: Firebringer
L-3
LIke dude, do you have a read or not?
Posted: Mon May 25, 2020 4:21 pm
by Firebringer
In post 1163, Sakura Hana wrote:I never understood why sometimes people quote things they arent meant to, never happened to me asides from misclicking. Does it have to do with multiquote? coz i never use that.
its usually because they forgot to turn of the multi quote.
In post 910, Firebringer wrote:i don't think his reads make sense with what he has posted. His posts look more like he is trying to look like he is doing something.
look at his progression on sakura and see what i mean.
I don't see what you mean. Isn't it possible for someone to have this thought progression?
Firebringer, isn't it possible for someone to have this thought progression?
Firebringer, isn't it possible for someone to have this thought progression?
i don't think its townie if thats ur question, r u asking me if i think its a natural possible town one? My answer is still no.
Posted: Mon May 25, 2020 4:24 pm
by Firebringer
like go through porkens posts on sakura early. He pushes sakura on a few things. It wasn't "ohh i scumread u" but it was enough to warrant like "i am worried about what u are doing". Then when sakura gets defensive he goes "Ohhh I am not even scumreading u though". When it is painfully obvious he is suspicious at least from his posts. Then eventually it just goes to townread. Its like bad.
In post 870, Firebringer wrote:just tell people who continue to say "meta is trash" that they are trash.
seriously all the oldies who shout meta = bad don't even understand how to use it because they are fucking boomers.
In post 873, Firebringer wrote:i seriously eyeroll anytime a boomer tells me "OHH META CAN BE MANIPULATED" like of course u fucking moron. the idea is to finding the nuances the player isn't aware of or has a hard time changing and using that to inform you of the player. Not this revolutionary idea. But boomers can't adjust because they tried using meta once or twice realize "ohh shit people changed I can't use this anymore" and then went "ohh well meta is trash" instead "Ohh this meta is outdated I need to readjusted".
I’m not a boomer. Don’t be a disrespectful dick.
I don’t use meta and I feel it is problematic but I don’t criticise people for using it. I simply pick apart the clear issues when they present.
"Kids" these days don't know a wall if it hit them.
In post 916, Firebringer wrote:i don't think its possible me playing mafia and not being a disrespectful prick....