Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:09 pm
is loki scum independantly of isis/drusilla or if, like, one of them was confirmed scum to you would you still think loki was scum?
who did you mean when you said morning?In post 1146, Tayl0r Swift wrote:im realizing morning is in a different game altogether.
and i didnt say anything about my alignment or anything else. i said they exist and you can read them. thats public info.In post 1148, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:yes but you definitely should not say anything about your alignment or literally anything about your on-going games - it is against site rulesIn post 1144, Tayl0r Swift wrote:and im not saying we should discuss my ongoing games. im just saying you can read over them to get a sense.
no one.In post 1151, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:who did you mean when you said morning?In post 1146, Tayl0r Swift wrote:im realizing morning is in a different game altogether.
independent. so if one of them flipped scum id still think loki was scum. i do see associatives i think, but the reads are independent. isis and drusilla could be scum cuz tinfoil hat, but i think its more likely that only one is scum. and i think that one is more likely drusilla.In post 1150, Ydrasse wrote:is loki scum independantly of isis/drusilla or if, like, one of them was confirmed scum to you would you still think loki was scum?
I'm not sure how scum indicative it is but I don't think pointing it out is disrespectfulIn post 1141, Tayl0r Swift wrote:like holy shit if i were scum i feel like id have a better story about my posts than that, or id just effort. if you think this is a scumslip you must think im very very very stupid. thats pretty disrespectful honestly.In post 1131, Isis wrote:This is another contradiction... you said you were in a rush to get to the phase where you could post unrestricted, and it's intuitive that collective tolerance for posting images would drop at that point. Now you say you were loving the post restricted phaseIn post 1129, Tayl0r Swift wrote:THIS IS SO MANIPULATIVE. if you know me youll know that i very much enjoy pushing buttons and posting images like that. i was having a blast. and had i rolled scum i probably would have done the same thing, and had even more fun doing it. youll see beaucoup shitposting in all my games (marathon games excepted somewhat because marathon games dont really allow time for that)In post 1098, Loki Dokie wrote:Especially when in those towngames I referenced, she played 180 degrees differently. And think about this, we all choose our respective animals because we actually LIKE those animals and therefore try to find the images we like the most but what does Tayl0r post? diseased sickly dogs. Do you think when she signed up for this game, she was enthusiastic to post those types of grotesque pictures? But she would very likely be upset if she got a red role PM and that very possibly could have affected the images she selected. Kanna managed to find cute bat picks but Tayl0r couldn’t even find one cute doggie?In post 1090, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:her lack of commitment and detachment is very scum-indicative. Mafia usually do feel detached in these nomination scenarios when they do not have anything at stake.
And her growling and barking at Isis and me for liking one of her posts was strange and then she topped it off by voting for her both days, so hiding behind the Isis is a cat thing, how isn’t that antitown? But had she then not claimed it was “random”, at least it would be consistent but then she claims it wasn’t random, it’s because Isis was a cat. Now, if she was actually doing some solving here, making reads etc., I’d ignore all of the above but we have an important decision to make and Tayl0r apparently has no opinion on it and isn’t even putting a good faith effort in actually trying and when I contrast that with those three games of hers - marathon or not - the difference is clearly striking.
I can definitely see why you’d think it scummy when I said I’d ignore everything if I actually saw you do something town indicative. Wanting players to actually try to make reads is clearly antitown. Are you trolling?In post 1130, Tayl0r Swift wrote:still catching up but at this point yes very much so.In post 1128, Isis wrote:Taylor do you think Loki is scummy?
You couldn’t “glean” anything from three ISO links, seriously?In post 1137, Ydrasse wrote:okay, i get that. i've not skimmed the marathon ones linked because i don't think i personally could glean anything from something that condensed but i will make do w them
Omgus reads, duly noted.
Tayl0r is scumreading anyone who either isn’t defending her or townreading her, which proves she hasn’t been fully reading my posts or is intentionally misrepping them.In post 1164, Isis wrote:Loki doesn't seem as towny when he's being reactive rather than proactive but that's probably situational and I will probably stick with my early read
Reasons? I didn’t interpret her post as her scumreading me but as her trying to nail Tayl0r down on her reads. Did you interpret that differently?In post 1163, Isis wrote:I don't think Ydrasse is town
Aren’t you forgetting a couple of players?
In post 1170, Loki Dokie wrote:Aren’t you forgetting a FEW players?
Where is NM, Pooky and plusJOYED on this list? but maybe you should add Hectic, he’s 100% lockscum.
Yes and plus didn’t jump on me like that, so that’s a point in his favour. But more importantly, Tayl0r also jumped on you and Dru as well and all Dru did was point out how solvey she was in a previous game and you had even previously been defending her, so it’s pretty damned obvious that she wasn’t being transparent about her real reasons for voting you. Her reaction to my read on her is highly scum indicative.In post 1168, Isis wrote:it was just a feel, I see where you're coming from.
she's not playing in a way that's particularly townreadable