Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 5:09 pm
I will remember to do this tomorrowIn post 1148, Lost wrote:also in reply to 1147: yes, some example would be nice
I will remember to do this tomorrowIn post 1148, Lost wrote:also in reply to 1147: yes, some example would be nice
that's fairIn post 1151, MURDERCAT wrote:Also no guarantee my feels will be the same after looking closely
are you naming pp as the third scum, or just naming pp as one of the potential 3rd scum because of the way he postures himself wrt ggIn post 1146, MURDERCAT wrote:PP is an example of someone who could be waiting and watching
lawlIn post 1133, GeniusGamer wrote:Pro Tip: I don’t really find it helpful to postIn post 1130, Lost wrote:it's more substantial than your bambi case that's for sureIn post 1129, GeniusGamer wrote:How... unsubstantial. I feel insulted by the fact that your read on me is not a 10-page psychological analysis.In post 1127, Lost wrote:probably scumIn post 1126, MURDERCAT wrote:I'd like to hear from lost and anyone else who hasn't posted about GG
also gotta leave this here while i catch up.
let me read posts i'm 10 pages behindbeforeyou’ve caught up. Also, I don’t think you’re in a position to call my posting unsubstantial when you have under 100 — actually, I’ll be generous — 75 posts at this point in the game.
can you untypo this for me i can't decipher
The later, man with no name is someone else who could be doing the same thingIn post 1153, Lost wrote:are you naming pp as the third scum, or just naming pp as one of the potential 3rd scum because of the way he postures himself wrt ggIn post 1146, MURDERCAT wrote:PP is an example of someone who could be waiting and watching
modified
That sums up Penguin in a nutshell.In post 1146, MURDERCAT wrote:PP is an example of someone who could be waiting and watchingIn post 1144, Lost wrote:you mentioned something about nm coaching gg but didn't quote/link it. can you share more on thatIn post 1143, MURDERCAT wrote:I could see NM scum with GG. Or anyone who just hasn't commented or gave a probably scum and left it at that
also who's the 3rd
yeah but what people look for is not whether opinions changed. its whether they can see what the person saw that changed your mind. and i see you saying "x is town" or "x is more likely scum" but i havent seen reasoning why. i cant really follow your progression. like you say "this post is kinda scummy" but then youll say the poster is town. i dont see a logical thought progression.In post 1013, GeniusGamer wrote:Fun fact: opinions can change upon reanalyzing data. Are you trying to gaslight me by twisting around everything I say or something?In post 1006, Isis wrote:In post 1002, GeniusGamer wrote:See, that’s not what I said. You people would make great sleazy politicians that are secretly working with the mafia to mislim people.In post 996, MURDERCAT wrote:You think Isis is scum?In post 991, GeniusGamer wrote:Isis is definitely acting more like scum than town, but not by much
I did not say she is scum. I did not say I think she’s scum. I think she’s more likely to be scum than town.pretty sure this is simply a scum!gamer forgetting his own read manufactures and scumslipping. He was discussing day1 posts here, the same ones that were all he had to work with when he stated this read before.In post 534, GeniusGamer wrote:Really? I don’t think Isis was really playing that terribly. She talked a lot about what the hider should do and have a few reads as well. I, for one,welcome our new insect overlordsthink that Isis is probably town.
can't really indulge NM's desire to be amused with something this clear and obvious. VOTE: GG
these must be the same people who made The RoomIn post 1022, Not_Mafia wrote:Guys I have solved it. GG is a disguised operative from an alien race who are readying to invade and colonise Earth. They are trying to use social deduction games to gather intel about humans, he is trying to fit in but notquitemanaging it.
interesting that gg is absent from this list. why is it that the person you're voting and is currently discussed didnt make it into the scumpile... hmmmIn post 1028, MURDERCAT wrote:I'd be interested in a general grouping along the lines of but with more separation if you think it warrants it:In post 1024, GeniusGamer wrote:Somewhere near the divide between scumminess and towniness, on the scummy side.
{bob}
{everyone else?}
{bambi, taylor, NM}
heres another post where it seems like you just want to be on the record saying how bad gg is
Wasn’t this just an example from Murdercat? I,e. Not their actual reads?In post 1163, Tayl0r Swift wrote:interesting that gg is absent from this list. why is it that the person you're voting and is currently discussed didnt make it into the scumpile... hmmmIn post 1028, MURDERCAT wrote:I'd be interested in a general grouping along the lines of but with more separation if you think it warrants it:In post 1024, GeniusGamer wrote:Somewhere near the divide between scumminess and towniness, on the scummy side.
{bob}
{everyone else?}
{bambi, taylor, NM}
that's gg's list, not murder'sIn post 1163, Tayl0r Swift wrote:interesting that gg is absent from this list. why is it that the person you're voting and is currently discussed didnt make it into the scumpile... hmmmIn post 1028, MURDERCAT wrote:I'd be interested in a general grouping along the lines of but with more separation if you think it warrants it:In post 1024, GeniusGamer wrote:Somewhere near the divide between scumminess and towniness, on the scummy side.
{bob}
{everyone else?}
{bambi, taylor, NM}
mwnn has been on v/la, i think that plays a part in his activity and involvement, no?In post 1156, MURDERCAT wrote:The later, man with no name is someone else who could be doing the same thingIn post 1153, Lost wrote:are you naming pp as the third scum, or just naming pp as one of the potential 3rd scum because of the way he postures himself wrt ggIn post 1146, MURDERCAT wrote:PP is an example of someone who could be waiting and watching
what would be the problem with thatIn post 1164, Tayl0r Swift wrote:heres another post where it seems like you just want to be on the record saying how bad gg is
agree with you on thatIn post 1169, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Can i just state for the record that i think Taylors take on Murdercat is really bad in these latest posts?
As of right now, Geniusgamer/Penguin/TaylorIn post 1171, Lost wrote:agree with you on thatIn post 1169, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Can i just state for the record that i think Taylors take on Murdercat is really bad in these latest posts?
what are your top 3 votes for today?
what value have you contributed? could you post your readlist for me? who is the scummiest person to you and why?In post 1135, Lost wrote:i'll post when i want toIn post 1133, GeniusGamer wrote:Pro Tip: I don’t really find it helpful to post before you’ve caught up. Also, I don’t think you’re in a position to call my posting unsubstantial when you have under 100 — actually, I’ll be generous — 75 posts at this point in the game.
post count != post value
do you see gg bussing tayl0r even though he doesn't have to?In post 1172, NorwegianboyEE wrote:As of right now, Geniusgamer/Penguin/Taylor
In no particular order of preference.