Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:53 pm
god i just really feel like one of agar/notty has to be scum here
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
if i did dont you think i wouldve indicated that by now instead of being conflictedIn post 1151, Gamma Emerald wrote:do you have any inclination on which it is?
I stopped after you made an advanced play after a suspicious pause, because I suspected you looked it up, when you had previously stated you weren't that good, so I was like "man I'm not gonna play against someone so interested in winning he's gonna look shit up against me in a casual game like this"In post 1153, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:gamma are you conceding that chess game btw?
trueIn post 1154, xRECKONERx wrote:if i did dont you think i wouldve indicated that by now instead of being conflictedIn post 1151, Gamma Emerald wrote:do you have any inclination on which it is?
lol whatIn post 1156, Gamma Emerald wrote:I stopped after you made an advanced play after a suspicious pause, because I suspected you looked it up, when you had previously stated you weren't that good, so I was like "man I'm not gonna play against someone so interested in winning he's gonna look shit up against me in a casual game like this"
This is kind of a silly statement that sounds good on paper, but really makes no sense. Anti-town play is literally the definition of playing to your wincon as scum. Every action scum takes is anti-town, some are just more overt than others.In post 1149, notscience wrote:
I have a very firm belief antitown actions are more commonly done by town as scum is more self concious about it. Given pookys chalenge was antitown as all fuck, I think he’s likely town.
but it gives him a pass to not have to busIn post 1148, AGar wrote:The counter point is it's a pretty low reward play (you might keep one of your scumbuddies out of a yeet pool for a bit, you maybe get a bit of towncred) with a lot of opportunity to backfire if one of them flips scum and is linked back to the person pushing it and even if they aren't they lose any potential gains as soon as that one flips. Unless you think notty's mild attempts to persuade others that all four were town will prevent any of them from ending up back in a challenge. I don't see it as a good play from Notty to try and save a scumbuddy there.
In post 1110, xRECKONERx wrote:this isn't an explanationIn post 1108, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:In post 82, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:let's go Cobra Kai
Strike Hard
Strike Fast
No Mercy!!
kill or kill
Nah, but I've also been operating under the assumption that one of Cakez/Notty is gonna challenge me. I'd prefer Notty or GE in the arena to tango with.In post 1165, VP Baltar wrote:AGar, you already say today who you think should be in the challenge arena?
This feels like a weaker justification, but ok.In post 1167, SirCakez wrote:but it gives him a pass to not have to busIn post 1148, AGar wrote:The counter point is it's a pretty low reward play (you might keep one of your scumbuddies out of a yeet pool for a bit, you maybe get a bit of towncred) with a lot of opportunity to backfire if one of them flips scum and is linked back to the person pushing it and even if they aren't they lose any potential gains as soon as that one flips. Unless you think notty's mild attempts to persuade others that all four were town will prevent any of them from ending up back in a challenge. I don't see it as a good play from Notty to try and save a scumbuddy there.
We all have control over this.In post 1172, AGar wrote:Nah, but I've also been operating under the assumption that one of Cakez/Notty is gonna challenge me. I'd prefer Notty or GE in the arena to tango with.