Page 47 of 88
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:36 pm
by Smoke and Mirrors
In post 1138, Chara wrote:
my ability is Intimidate, in a battle i decrease the opponent's attack by 1.
i have one move, Iron Head, it has a 30% chance of skipping my opponent's attack. so basically, it has the flinch effect.
i don't have much time for mafia tonight, but i'll be here tomorrow.
VOTE: Red
@mod, probably silly question but do scum have fake claims?
When I was scum in Undertale, we got full fakeclaims so this is why I think this could be that, it doesn’t look like anything they just made up.
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:49 pm
by catboi
We just let it resolve anyway, if Red doesn't retract then either Chara is mafia or he is.
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:53 pm
by Raya36
In post 1150, Smoke and Mirrors wrote: In post 1138, Chara wrote:
my ability is Intimidate, in a battle i decrease the opponent's attack by 1.
i have one move, Iron Head, it has a 30% chance of skipping my opponent's attack. so basically, it has the flinch effect.
i don't have much time for mafia tonight, but i'll be here tomorrow.
VOTE: Red
@mod, probably silly question but do scum have fake claims?
When I was scum in Undertale, we got full fakeclaims so this is why I think this could be that, it doesn’t look like anything they just made up.
Yeah I agree. It looks well thought out and also it would make sense as a fakeclaim since it doesn't fit with what Red said.
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:53 pm
by Raya36
In post 1151, catboi wrote:We just let it resolve anyway, if Red doesn't retract then either Chara is mafia or he is.
Yeah, unless it was a false guilty then we just have a 50/50 situation
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:54 pm
by Firebringer
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:02 pm
by Mistyx
mawile good pokemon
that is all i have to add at the current time
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:02 pm
by wellermanbob
Lets get a specific claim from red
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:02 pm
by Mistyx
i would rather red come back and claim the specific nature of their check
inclined to believe them over chara at the current time but not 100%
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:04 pm
by Nancy Drew 39
Wow, then that claim is super impressive. Chara’s lack of an emotional reaction to Red’s guilty is interesting. If someone were to ever fake a guilty on me - has only ever happened on MU before - I will definitely make them regret it but I’m obviously not Chara but in that specific MU game, I pretty much gave the scum who tried to push through a fake guilty on me no choice but to completely retract it.
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:06 pm
by Smoke and Mirrors
In post 1158, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
Wow, then that claim is super impressive. Chara’s lack of an emotional reaction to Red’s guilty is interesting. If someone were to ever fake a guilty on me - has only ever happened on MU before - I will definitely make them regret it but I’m obviously not Chara but in that specific MU game, I pretty much gave the scum who tried to push through a fake guilty on me no choice but to completely retract it.
However, as Raya says, I think Red’s guilty is probably legit, plus Chara seems much too chill for a townie with a fake guilty on them.
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:11 pm
by wellermanbob
Ya I mean elim is probably sorted but like
Lets still get Red to fully reveal things
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:11 pm
by wellermanbob
So theres no
Hahaa i was just kidding I felt really good about it yaknow?
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:12 pm
by Smoke and Mirrors
In post 1153, Raya36 wrote: In post 1151, catboi wrote:We just let it resolve anyway, if Red doesn't retract then either Chara is mafia or he is.
Yeah, unless it was a false guilty then we just have a 50/50 situation
Fake guilties tend to be more vague so scum can walk it back but Red’s was extremely specific, which usually means it’s real.
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:17 pm
by Smoke and Mirrors
In post 1157, Mistyx wrote:i would rather red come back and claim the specific nature of their check
inclined to believe them over chara at the current time but not 100%
What didn’t you think was “specific” about 1079? Of course I would also like more context but it’s pretty clear they claimed they A) have a weapon and B) sounds like Red has evidence linking unwnd kill to Chara.
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:19 pm
by Raya36
In post 1159, Smoke and Mirrors wrote: In post 1158, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:
Wow, then that claim is super impressive. Chara’s lack of an emotional reaction to Red’s guilty is interesting. If someone were to ever fake a guilty on me - has only ever happened on MU before - I will definitely make them regret it but I’m obviously not Chara but in that specific MU game, I pretty much gave the scum who tried to push through a fake guilty on me no choice but to completely retract it.
However, as Raya says, I think Red’s guilty is probably legit, plus Chara seems much too chill for a townie with a fake guilty on them.
Yeah it does feel like Chara is trying to appear relaxed
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:20 pm
by Raya36
In post 1162, Smoke and Mirrors wrote: In post 1153, Raya36 wrote: In post 1151, catboi wrote:We just let it resolve anyway, if Red doesn't retract then either Chara is mafia or he is.
Yeah, unless it was a false guilty then we just have a 50/50 situation
Fake guilties tend to be more vague so scum can walk it back but Red’s was extremely specific, which usually means it’s real.
I agree that Red's guilty is probably real but it wasn't really that specific
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:31 pm
by Infinity Zero
In post 1056, Smoke and Mirrors wrote: In post 1055, Smoke and Mirrors wrote: In post 994, Titus wrote:*shrug*
Same thing just happened in Open 802. Caught scum, people said I was wrong. Said scum won.
It's probably just jjh and the twins.
After I flip town, jjh will go after gamma.
The twins will lurk.
I think I may have possibly voted Titus because she really hurt my feelings and I try not to let that influence my vote.
IZ is super obvious town btw. So, this makes me question my Titus scumread.
Infinity thinks Mistyx is more likely scum than Titus and apparently Chara was guiltied so Titus might be town, but I feel like she handled you very differently to how I did.
-Protocol
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:34 pm
by Mistyx
Gamma can you talk with me about your read on me
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:35 pm
by Infinity Zero
In post 1036, Twins Akari and Mara wrote: In post 964, Titus wrote:JJH is trying to eliminate two loud town posters here in addition to shade my work and reads.
Infinity is loud sure, but after your asectic claim you're largely a non-presence.
I locked myself out of this account for a good Portion of d1 but when I logged in, I was far more influential than you are so I have no clue to how you get off at calling me a lurker. I didn't egen get a sense that you scum-read my slot until I became a viable wagon at deadline, and now that I was once one maybe I will be one today?
I feel like that is where you may be going with current line of reason.
Further more, while you're accusing jjh of doing that's you're trying to knock Nancy down a peg because she dares to voice her opinions and is one of the more influential people of today?
I’m assuming this is Akarin
Who are your strong TRs rn?
-Protocol
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:41 pm
by Titus
Ugh, I don't want to read up.
Red claimed a guilty on Chara?
Red had his bullshit push on me.
Strongly in favor of a Red lim by play.
I know strategically never eliminate the guilter before the guilty though.
While I am like 99.9% sure jjh is scum, it should be asked though...any chance of S v S?
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:41 pm
by Infinity Zero
In post 1047, Smoke and Mirrors wrote: In post 989, Titus wrote:I really hope Mistyx is town because Nancy's being toxic.
Being scum against her would be a cakewalk.
I honestly don’t know if I can even play anymore because of this. :/
This tracks w/ what happened in CoD, one of my comments there was the exact thing in the second line of Titus’ post
-Protocol
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:42 pm
by Mistyx
people keep shortening the names of games and i have no clue what they're talking about
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:42 pm
by Titus
CoD?
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:44 pm
by Infinity Zero
Cards of Destiny
yeah it can get confusing and I apologize for that, but it’s much easier to use shorthand with how much meta I use at times
-Protocol
Posted: Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:45 pm
by Titus
I don't recall that game.