Page 48 of 205

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:26 pm
by Amrun
It was to Matt.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:29 pm
by MattP
In post 1169, Jon Doe wrote:What happens when one assumes?
So despite you having a QT to discuss this stuff your hydra partner said NOTHING over the duration of the ENTIRE day phase in the QT about flavor analysis?

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:32 pm
by Jon Doe
In post 1157, MattP wrote:
In post 1154, Sugar Cain wrote:Like, I find it hard to believe that this comment is coming from a scum-hydra.

~Sugar
I've posted in thread INCREDIBLY similar things when I was scum in Gay mafia 2 as a hydra


It makes you look like you're discussing things in your QT

Whatever, at worst you can just ignore it because it can be either
In post 1153, MattP wrote:
In post 1148, Amrun wrote:I thought they were super scummy coming into today for basically the same reasons. However, the assuming Trust Fund is a scum kill struck me as unlikely to come from scum if Trust Fund ISN'T the scum kill, and I think future nights will sort out which one was the scum kill. Does that make sense to you, Matt?

The "dipshit" comment isn't scummy, though.
They've done enough scummy things that just dont make sense from town to be probabilistically scum-oriented

And he just ignored every point I made except for the dipshit one and then called me a dipshit twice, which
Mod, please warn them before they're making personal insults
And at last... Really? You can lash out at others but when the favor is returned, your heart is on your sleeve? See the hypocricy here a little bit?

And I don't want you to crawl off in a shell, so lets look at a definition
Urban Dictionary: dipshit

1. an ineffectual person; one with a habit of being wrong, loudly and often.
How is that an attack on your person in the first place?

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:33 pm
by Jon Doe
In post 1176, MattP wrote:
In post 1169, Jon Doe wrote:What happens when one assumes?
So despite you having a QT to discuss this stuff your hydra partner said NOTHING over the duration of the ENTIRE day phase in the QT about flavor analysis?
Correct, or I would have advised her not to because flavor doesn't apply here.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:34 pm
by MattP
1. A despised person; a moron; an ineffectual person; one with a habit of being wrong, loudly and often.

Yeah, cool ignore the first part of the definition if you want to be cute with semantics.

Done with this convo. Venmar can deal with it.

pedit: Caught you in a lie, whoops!

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:35 pm
by MattP
In post 1059, Jon Doe wrote:
In post 1054, Amrun wrote:Why?
I'll let my other head handle this because it came from her. I will sum it up though. Flavor said smothered with pillow. She said zombies don't use pillows. Legit train of thought.

@bork I can accept that. I would like to keep it for later though if GiF gets wonky.

VOTE: OGML
Hm it seems like you were idk OH summarizing your hydra partner's thoughts for another player! HMMMMM

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:36 pm
by MattP
Noone need get involved in this convo besides myself and Jon Doe right now

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:36 pm
by Jon Doe
In post 1173, Sugar Cain wrote:You should be able to say the Jist of what she's thinking at the very least, especially if you guys are talking about it in your QT

~Sugar
Logic train... You know I know flavor doesn't apply here. On what planet would I have told her it was a good idea to do any analysis based on flavor?

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:39 pm
by Jon Doe
In post 1180, MattP wrote:
In post 1059, Jon Doe wrote:
In post 1054, Amrun wrote:Why?
I'll let my other head handle this because it came from her. I will sum it up though. Flavor said smothered with pillow. She said zombies don't use pillows. Legit train of thought.

@bork I can accept that. I would like to keep it for later though if GiF gets wonky.

VOTE: OGML
Hm it seems like you were idk OH summarizing your hydra partner's thoughts for another player! HMMMMM
OMG! I'm really trying to have patience now because it seems you may legitimately be confused and not just being obstinate. I summarized what she had already stated
IN THE THREAD
. You asked for a detailed breakdown of her thought process. How you expected me to be able to tell you someone else's private thoughts is beyond me.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:40 pm
by Jon Doe
I mean, by that logic you should probably just sheep me on every action I make, being able to read the minds of others and all.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:42 pm
by MattP
It didn't matter whether or not she had said it in thread, it mattered if you said it because she had said it in thread, AND if you remembered that's why you said it.

I no longer think you slipped in that regard. I think you're probably town. The end.

Unvote

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:44 pm
by Jon Doe
In post 1179, MattP wrote:1. A despised person; a moron; an ineffectual person; one with a habit of being wrong, loudly and often.

Yeah, cool ignore the first part of the definition if you want to be cute with semantics.

Done with this convo. Venmar can deal with it.

pedit: Caught you in a lie, whoops!
I'm so scurred. There are many definitions to almost every word in the English language. The Urban dictionary doesn't give the nice

1.

2.

3.

Like Webster's. they use semicolons.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:45 pm
by Jon Doe
And I'm sorry you took offense to something that wasn't meant to be taken the way you took it.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:46 pm
by MattP
Also, when you're incredibly rude and arrogant in response to me and call me personal names, which is NOT what I signed up for and is against the rules, no, that's not ok. Do not do that in the future, no matter how frustrated you are. When I was arguing with PM I made it explicit that I was frustrated only with her play and that it had no bearing on her as a person. Calling me a dipshit multiple times, which has the term "shit" in it, and then trying to exonerate yourself with an urbandictionary definition is not all right. Simple.

Pedit: Are you seriously acting haughty about me asking you not to use a term towards me? You're being ridiculous.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:48 pm
by Jon Doe
In post 1110, Jon Doe wrote:
In post 1099, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1097, Jon Doe wrote:I like Thor's reluctance to have anyone label him as town.
I always thought I was super stoked to be called town.

In any case, now that you're town reading me - wanna sheep?
You seem to exude confidence and never second guess yourself. Would this be a fair assumption?
Because it keeps getting buried. Someone doesn't want Thor to see this for some reason.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:50 pm
by Jon Doe
In post 1188, MattP wrote:Also, when you're incredibly rude and arrogant in response to me and call me personal names, which is NOT what I signed up for and is against the rules, no, that's not ok. Do not do that in the future, no matter how frustrated you are. When I was arguing with PM I made it explicit that I was frustrated only with her play and that it had no bearing on her as a person. Calling me a dipshit multiple times, which has the term "shit" in it, and then trying to exonerate yourself with an urbandictionary definition is not all right. Simple.

Pedit: Are you seriously acting haughty about me asking you not to use a term towards me? You're being ridiculous.
No. That was an apology.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:51 pm
by Jon Doe
Are you going to be big enough to accept it and move on?

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:59 pm
by Venmar
*sigh*

Jon Doe, your behaviour has been, plainly put, pretty unacceptable. You have gone over the line several times and you are acting seriously immature. Consider this two strikes, if I catch you breaking my rules with vulgarity or just being immature and offensive again, I will force replace you without further notice.

All personal arguments should also not be continued.

VC coming up.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 7:04 pm
by Venmar
Votecount 2.4


[L-9]
Pitoli:
Desperado

[L-10] RedCoyote:

[L-10] Amrun:

[L-7]
Jon Doe:
OhGodMyLife, Toogeloo, Sugar Cain

[L-10] Desperado:

[L-10] borkjerfkin:

[L-10] PeregrineV:

[L-10] Mastin2:

:right:
[L-6]
OhGodMyLife:
No Brains Here, Jon Doe, borkjerfkin, Amrun

[L-10] Aj the Epic:

[L-10] No Brains Here:

[L-10] Toogeloo:

[L-10] Ellibereth:

[L-10] ActionDan:

[L-10] Mattp:

[L-10] Sangres:

[L-10] Thor665:

[L-10] GuyInFreezer:

[L-8]
Sugar Cain:
Aj the Epic, Thor665


Not Voting (9):
  • Pitoli, RedCoyote, PeregrineV, Mastin2, Ellibereth, ActionDan, Sangres, GuyInFreezer, Mattp
Deadline:
  • Friday, August 16th, 2013
Mod Notes:
  • With 19 alive, it takes 10 to lynch.
  • Mattp is V/LA until August 9th I believe.
  • GuyInFreezer is V/LA until 8/5
  • Amrun and Mastin2 are V/LA on Weekends.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 7:56 pm
by Sugar Cain
In post 1116, Amrun wrote:Thor being shady isn't a valid reason not to vote you in the current gamestate.
please explain this?

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 7:58 pm
by sangres
While I finish catching up I have something to say.

If Trust Fund was vigged then the vig needs to sit down and take stock of his/her life because that would be one of the dumbest vig kills of all time.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 8:37 pm
by Aj The Epic
In post 1123, MattP wrote:I think OGML is a fine vote right now. I think the major concern is that we should be systematically going through shitty players and ripping them apart instead of taking the most active, town players and fixating on each other just because we're here.

Sugar Cain, no brain, and myself are town. And we're loud town. We need to just STFU and work together and compromise on pushes so that we have more power. It's simple.
You're all loud, I'll give you that -.-

Vote:Jon Doe


(Personally, I'm almost as lost as Amrun was at the start of their flavor analysis) BUT I do realize they called OGML for something I never really saw and a 5-post row is one of the easiest scum tells in the game. Constant correction/adding leads from insecurity and need to respond, a forced town approach, and mostly just easy scum play.

That being said, of the major wagons, I naturally trust Thor more than most of you combined and betting with Sugar Cane's vote makes me feel rather insecure ESPECIALLY since Matt isn't playing the meta I know him to play (fake claiming every other post and whatnot). But, I trust that wagon more than the Jon Doe/NBH wagon on OGML.

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 8:51 pm
by Sugar Cain
._.

whut?

Matty isn't even on Doe anymore

do you think Thor is town AJ?

~Sugar

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 8:53 pm
by Sugar Cain
UNVOTE:

I need to sit on this

~Sugar

Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 8:58 pm
by Sugar Cain
WHat do you think of the fact of, every single vote/unvote aside from Pitoli has been done by me so far?

~Sugar