Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:26 pm
It was to Matt.
So despite you having a QT to discuss this stuff your hydra partner said NOTHING over the duration of the ENTIRE day phase in the QT about flavor analysis?In post 1169, Jon Doe wrote:What happens when one assumes?
In post 1157, MattP wrote:In post 1154, Sugar Cain wrote:Like, I find it hard to believe that this comment is coming from a scum-hydra.
~SugarI've posted in thread INCREDIBLY similar things when I was scum in Gay mafia 2 as a hydra
It makes you look like you're discussing things in your QT
Whatever, at worst you can just ignore it because it can be either
And at last... Really? You can lash out at others but when the favor is returned, your heart is on your sleeve? See the hypocricy here a little bit?In post 1153, MattP wrote:They've done enough scummy things that just dont make sense from town to be probabilistically scum-orientedIn post 1148, Amrun wrote:I thought they were super scummy coming into today for basically the same reasons. However, the assuming Trust Fund is a scum kill struck me as unlikely to come from scum if Trust Fund ISN'T the scum kill, and I think future nights will sort out which one was the scum kill. Does that make sense to you, Matt?
The "dipshit" comment isn't scummy, though.
And he just ignored every point I made except for the dipshit one and then called me a dipshit twice, whichMod, please warn them before they're making personal insults
How is that an attack on your person in the first place?Urban Dictionary: dipshit
1. an ineffectual person; one with a habit of being wrong, loudly and often.
Correct, or I would have advised her not to because flavor doesn't apply here.In post 1176, MattP wrote:So despite you having a QT to discuss this stuff your hydra partner said NOTHING over the duration of the ENTIRE day phase in the QT about flavor analysis?In post 1169, Jon Doe wrote:What happens when one assumes?
Hm it seems like you were idk OH summarizing your hydra partner's thoughts for another player! HMMMMMIn post 1059, Jon Doe wrote:I'll let my other head handle this because it came from her. I will sum it up though. Flavor said smothered with pillow. She said zombies don't use pillows. Legit train of thought.In post 1054, Amrun wrote:Why?
@bork I can accept that. I would like to keep it for later though if GiF gets wonky.
VOTE: OGML
Logic train... You know I know flavor doesn't apply here. On what planet would I have told her it was a good idea to do any analysis based on flavor?In post 1173, Sugar Cain wrote:You should be able to say the Jist of what she's thinking at the very least, especially if you guys are talking about it in your QT
~Sugar
OMG! I'm really trying to have patience now because it seems you may legitimately be confused and not just being obstinate. I summarized what she had already statedIn post 1180, MattP wrote:Hm it seems like you were idk OH summarizing your hydra partner's thoughts for another player! HMMMMMIn post 1059, Jon Doe wrote:I'll let my other head handle this because it came from her. I will sum it up though. Flavor said smothered with pillow. She said zombies don't use pillows. Legit train of thought.In post 1054, Amrun wrote:Why?
@bork I can accept that. I would like to keep it for later though if GiF gets wonky.
VOTE: OGML
I'm so scurred. There are many definitions to almost every word in the English language. The Urban dictionary doesn't give the niceIn post 1179, MattP wrote:1. A despised person; a moron; an ineffectual person; one with a habit of being wrong, loudly and often.
Yeah, cool ignore the first part of the definition if you want to be cute with semantics.
Done with this convo. Venmar can deal with it.
pedit: Caught you in a lie, whoops!
Because it keeps getting buried. Someone doesn't want Thor to see this for some reason.In post 1110, Jon Doe wrote:You seem to exude confidence and never second guess yourself. Would this be a fair assumption?In post 1099, Thor665 wrote:I always thought I was super stoked to be called town.In post 1097, Jon Doe wrote:I like Thor's reluctance to have anyone label him as town.
In any case, now that you're town reading me - wanna sheep?
No. That was an apology.In post 1188, MattP wrote:Also, when you're incredibly rude and arrogant in response to me and call me personal names, which is NOT what I signed up for and is against the rules, no, that's not ok. Do not do that in the future, no matter how frustrated you are. When I was arguing with PM I made it explicit that I was frustrated only with her play and that it had no bearing on her as a person. Calling me a dipshit multiple times, which has the term "shit" in it, and then trying to exonerate yourself with an urbandictionary definition is not all right. Simple.
Pedit: Are you seriously acting haughty about me asking you not to use a term towards me? You're being ridiculous.
please explain this?In post 1116, Amrun wrote:Thor being shady isn't a valid reason not to vote you in the current gamestate.
You're all loud, I'll give you that -.-In post 1123, MattP wrote:I think OGML is a fine vote right now. I think the major concern is that we should be systematically going through shitty players and ripping them apart instead of taking the most active, town players and fixating on each other just because we're here.
Sugar Cain, no brain, and myself are town. And we're loud town. We need to just STFU and work together and compromise on pushes so that we have more power. It's simple.