Page 48 of 53

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 5:20 am
by beastcharizard
Titus, you are reaching again. The "you know how many scum there are" thing is something I do as scum, so I view it as a scummy thing.

What is hypo cop and where did you get that from?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:10 am
by Titus
Could be gf. I don't like the confidence in an open setup. Why wouldn't RT be roleblocked or killed?

Hypo cop = hypothetical cop.

Why are we supposing an encryptor? Mafia should have some cop counter.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:24 am
by GuyInFreezer
In post 1176, Titus wrote:Could be gf. I don't like the confidence in an open setup. Why wouldn't RT be roleblocked or killed?

Hypo cop = hypothetical cop.

Why are we supposing an encryptor? Mafia should have some cop counter.
Scum had a 1-shot strongman, which is a cop counter.
Also, the cop was odd-night.
Doctor is apparently also a miller, which is also a cop counter.

Also I really really doubt that one scum will be both encrpytor and godfather.

Also why are we supposing an encrpytor?
In post 1079, Natirasha wrote: To top it off, you wanna know some bullshit?
The mafia has daytalk! DAYTALK!
And, moreover, I have a scummate who HAS YET TO POST in it! HA AH HAHa, it's fucking ridiculous. I, just, how useless can you get?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:13 am
by Rebel Without a Pulse
In post 1160, ProHawk wrote:
In post 1159, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:
Vote: Prohawk
Because I totally threw this game by hard-bussing my team all in a row amirite? Was this vote placed by Nacho-perchance?
Probably not, no. What do you think of Titus?
In post 1172, Titus wrote:What inno result?

With hypo cop, I would expect gf or roleblocker. Gf means an inno is worthless.
There's a miller and cop is already limited by being odd night. Try again?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:13 am
by Rebel Without a Pulse
Unvote, Vote: Titus

mebbe ns.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:30 am
by artemiskitty
In post 1153, Rail Tracer wrote: plus the batshit crazy reads they've had all game didn't strike me as being particularly scum-motivated.
shh

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:36 am
by artemiskitty
i'm still wondering about NS a bit.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:59 am
by notscience
I am so confused right now.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:17 am
by GuyInFreezer
Hey ns didn't you say one day that you play srs as scum?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:34 pm
by notscience
Yes.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:46 pm
by GuyInFreezer
VOTE: notscience

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:50 pm
by notscience
How closely have you been following the game, GIF?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:53 pm
by Cabd
Vote Count of the Fourth City, Second Block

Players Alive: 8
Votes to Lynch: 5
Format of:
Wagon (size): Voters on wagon

Titus (2): beastcharizard, Rebel Without a Pulse

beastcharizard (1): Titus
notscience (1): GuyInFreezer

Deadline falls on the 20th of October. That is (expired on 2013-10-20 23:59:00)

Mod Notes:
I got nuttin.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:53 pm
by GuyInFreezer
nacho and fery fed me in the neighbor QT. I think I know what I'm doing.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:54 pm
by notscience
Okay.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 3:50 pm
by ProHawk
In post 1178, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:
Probably not, no. What do you think of Titus?
Not reading. Not thinking. Not paying attention. I may have a bit of bias in that I am pretty confident not all three scum were on the D1 mis-lynch wagon... but I don't see scum in Titus despite the horrific logic put forth this game from her.

What are your thoughts on the D1 wagon in terms of where the scum-votes landed?

Still not sure why this isn't being considered...

VOTE: ArtemisKitty

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:38 pm
by Titus
I will reread because I have missed a fair amount. Shit happens. AK's associative tells are not weak. I can understand why people want to lynch her. I just feel AK is town because she was saying what I thought at the time but for BS.

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:40 pm
by Titus
I don't think the mafia have daytalk. I also don't think Nati has a scumbuddy who has never posted. I don't trust that post.

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:22 am
by beastcharizard
Cool, then get off me since my slot has done nothing. By your logic you shouldn't even be voting me.

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:47 am
by GuyInFreezer
I don't believe in the "scumbuddy who never posted in daytalk" part, but I do believe the daytalk part itself, though.
It would be bit too odd topic to use for wifoming. (It's not like presence of daytalk change a lot)

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 4:05 am
by Rebel Without a Pulse
Vote: notscience


Prohawk, I don't think they landed on the wagon either. Why are you voting AK?

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 4:54 am
by Titus
In post 1194, GuyInFreezer wrote:I don't believe in the "scumbuddy who never posted in daytalk" part, but I do believe the daytalk part itself, though.
It would be bit too odd topic to use for wifoming. (It's not like presence of daytalk change a lot)
Daytalk changes a lot. For instance, daytalk gives credence to my theory that the end of yesterday was a massive bus to cut short the day.

VOTE: notscience

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 6:12 am
by ProHawk
In post 1195, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:
Vote: notscience


Prohawk, I don't think they landed on the wagon either. Why are you voting AK?
General absence last game day and this game day is troubling to me topped off with trying to get me lynched on a false premise. NS isn't a terrible lynch and would be my second choice.

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 6:14 am
by ProHawk
In post 1196, Titus wrote:
In post 1194, GuyInFreezer wrote:I don't believe in the "scumbuddy who never posted in daytalk" part, but I do believe the daytalk part itself, though.
It would be bit too odd topic to use for wifoming. (It's not like presence of daytalk change a lot)
Daytalk changes a lot. For instance, daytalk gives credence to my theory that the end of yesterday was a massive bus to cut short the day.

VOTE: notscience
You literally can't make this stuff up. What game are you reading?

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:56 am
by Rail Tracer
reading stuff tonight