Mafiascum.net

i mean if you're an innocent child, just reveal so you can go back to being useless and we'll be all like LOL THAT MINA SUCH AN INNOCENT CHILD and stuff

reck's slots interactions w/r/t ad are pretty bad
nuwen's are meh
eaglekit also kind of just avoiding talking about EVERYTHING IMPORTANT so i guess there's a good chance of someone among them as scum

idr who was on, gamma, fate look town.

I remeber cdb/actiondan's interactions bugging me at the time so i'll go back and see how that worked out, pretty sure the interactions looked super awkward though but not sure if it was just b/c dan is scum.

ut is prob town I guess
cheerydog is ????


uh ythan town, iec pretty town although one thing bugged me + reminded me of gay mafia so I need to check it out but role looks p town at least I guess even if it's a super weird role for town w/ survivor imo

3 scum left so.

In post 1034, Iecerint wrote:Time for ActionDan to be a town bomb who blows me up.

oh, yeah it was this, it felt a weird comment given how he was p confident on dan + imo dan's self vote looked fake (although i thought he was flipping town after the vt claim but etc). idk if it's a joke or whatever it just struck me as awkward at the time, I guess.

Faraday, if you get to be "DUDE I'M FUCKING OBVTOWN WTF" (and, to an extent, you do get to be that way), then I also get to be that way. Because I am obv as fuck not Dan's buddy.

Cheery remains a super-null read for me. I guess I should specify seeing as he's not in my 'other plausible votes' list today. He's not become a townread since my last readslist.

Faraday, why are our interactions with AD bad?

AFAIK, our only interactions were:
- he wanted to sheep us at the start of D1. Like, publicly. Aggressive sheeping. Are you saying that was scum buddying another scum? Seems unlikely.
- we asked for reasons on the ActionDan wagon since we hadn't paid attention, and you just said "prove he's town". That's it.

In post 37, ActionDan wrote:No vote from overlords to sheep makes me sad. How am I going to submit to your will now?

In post 39, ActionDan wrote:O wait they did vote. All is right with the world

VOTE: pie

^ scumbuddy pillow talk obv

In post 1179, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:- he wanted to sheep us at the start of D1. Like, publicly. Aggressive sheeping. Are you saying that was scum buddying another scum? Seems unlikely.

I knew there was a reason why I had question marks on my notes about you guys as a vote today. This is why we start with Axxle instead.

CDB you should post your notes. like now. in full

oh hai!

eagle people are town

I can't remember everything I read

In post 1179, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:Faraday, why are our interactions with AD bad?

Because I think they look bad?

but yes, it's the second thing I didn't like not sure you were worried about what basically a null read getting wagoned, when you were later pretty happy to wagon someone (in eaglekit) who hadn't posted enough to give you a read. your whole follow up about the burden of proof being on me to prove he's scum, was kind of weird too.

(don't really think the first thing is a town tell for you, obviously.)

So I'm going to put my other head and faraday in detention if they can't get along.

Faraday I know you're not reading us as scum because of the way you interacted with us yesterday, but Mina is concerned about you because other than early in the day you didn't actually proclaim us as town so she thinks you're holding back on that and it's one of the things that is making her paranoid of you.

We're not an innocent child, but once we claim our alignment will become obvious so sorrynotsorry for any Waffles are scum who bussed AD posts that are in the works. Mina has things she wants to do and we do need to claim it before the end of day, so no ending until that's done!

In post 1167, Untrod Tripod wrote:waffle moar

you should see our skype chat!

In post 1182, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:CDB you should post your notes. like now. in full

I pretty much already have. It's literally just a list of 'conceivable votes today' and 'conceivable busses on the lynch wagon' with no elaboration, picked up as I skimmed the thread just now. The only thing I haven't yet mentioned from it is that UT was on the 'conceivable busses' list but I don't think he's particularly compatible with some of my scummier reads so I'm not interested in going there today.

I am, however, flattered that you think I'd have a whole bunch of stuff written down which I wouldn't immediately write up in the thread to show off how good at this game I am.

In post 1184, Eleven wrote:

In post 1179, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:Faraday, why are our interactions with AD bad?

Because I think they look bad?

but yes, it's the second thing I didn't like not sure you were worried about what basically a null read getting wagoned, when you were later pretty happy to wagon someone (in eaglekit) who hadn't posted enough to give you a read. your whole follow up about the burden of proof being on me to prove he's scum, was kind of weird too.

(don't really think the first thing is a town tell for you, obviously.)

From my POV Dan looked like an easy lynch and I hadn't actually seen anyone discuss anything about him so I found the few votes on him really awkward

I'm pretty sure I've said the "burden of proof pls" bit plenty of times before in games when people have asked me to prove why someone is town. actually I can get examples if you'd like

also Dan's whole reaction to us about wanting to sheep us was a cute little pun on our username and I don't really think he would've done that if we were scum with him since there would've assumedly been QT chat pregame and that kind of interaction seems really weird and stupid to spend time thinking about or planning

In post 1188, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:I hadn't actually seen anyone discuss anything about him

I really don't know how hard it could possibly have been to read my damn posts. I didn't wall or anything.

Faraday, you're being a pretty huge dick, because I think my question was reasonable and you blew it off (also, maybe I'm wrong, but I didn't get the impression at ALL that you seriously suspected Reck; also, you thinking CDB isn't obvtown is a scumtell; also, I think you expecting ActionDan to flip town looks fake because ActionDan was FUCKING REALLY REALLY REALLY OBVIOUSLY flipping scum after he'd self-voted), but anyway:

1) We are a JOAT variant. (Seems like Dan would've been screwed if he'd ever claimed, but anyway.) Explaining more would give away our flavour, and see 5).

2) We shot Triforce last night. (Sorry for auto-losing you the game, guys! We mostly believed your claim, but you were a huge distraction and we were too big pussies--pun intended--to go for a flashier kill with the short D1. Besides, you were dangerous with Iecerint's role.)

3) We are claiming partly because it's useful information about the set-up (both because it tells people there's only one scum faction and because it helps evaluate Ythan's role--FWIW, I think both are compatible, particularly given a certain aspect of ours I won't claim yet), but mostly because:

4) Our second ability is a one-shot modified hide. If there are two deaths tonight and one of them is us, you can basically be sure that we targeted scum. (Due to the "modified" factor, it's not COMPLETELY impossible if we're the only death, but I checked with the mods and hides can't be roleblocked.) Unfortunately, we won't flip as a hider, which is why claiming rather than leaving an obvious breadcrumb like, "IF I DIE, TAMMY IS SCUM!" is necessary.

5) At the end of the day, I will post a list of all the players in the game next to letters of the alphabet. We will say something like, "The first letter of the first X-letter word of our flavour name corresponds to our target." If we die that night, the player next to that letter is the person we targeted. So if there are two deaths and one of them is us that night. (I checked with the mods and hides can't be roleblocked, but there's an element to the "modified" that wouldn't make it completely impossible our target was town if we were the only death that night. It's not the likeliest event, but I don't want to unwittingly frame someone postmortem.) This way, the scum can't try to take us out by killing our target.

6) I feel like we should probably be close-lipped today about our suspects to make whoever we target more unpredictable, but it might be hard for us to keep this promise.

I'd say, "Any questions?" but I probably won't answer them. Have a nice day!

(Oops, I repeated myself. Way to ruin the glorious effect of my claim post! )

CDB I was just curious because I attempted to start a notepad file D1 to keep running thoughts about the game but I'm pretty sure I deleted it already.

p.edit cdb:

In post 1190, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:5) At the end of the day, I will post a list of all the players in the game next to letters of the alphabet. We will say something like, "The first letter of the first X-letter word of our flavour name corresponds to our target." If we die that night, the player next to that letter is the person we targeted. So if there are two deaths and one of them is us that night. (I checked with the mods and hides can't be roleblocked, but there's an element to the "modified" that wouldn't make it completely impossible our target was town if we were the only death that night. It's not the likeliest event, but I don't want to unwittingly frame someone postmortem.) This way, the scum can't try to take us out by killing our target.

oh wow that's p cool

In post 1192, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:CDB I was just curious because I attempted to start a notepad file D1 to keep running thoughts about the game but I'm pretty sure I deleted it already.

Meh. Running thoughts are overrated. Just skimreread every night that you need to and start from scratch.

Also, screw you, my posts are glorious.

In post 1185, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Faraday I know you're not reading us as scum because of the way you interacted with us yesterday, but Mina is concerned about you because other than early in the day you didn't actually proclaim us as town so she thinks you're holding back on that and it's one of the things that is making her paranoid of you.

I feel like mina shouldn't try to have thoughts on me given they're p bad. i guess i'll ask her postgame what goes through her mind and she'll be likeBUT OMG MAYBE YOU WERE SETTING US UP FOR A MISLYNCH qq.

yay for you guys being confirmed town, I only really had a flash of paranoia until tammy made that big long post i totally didn't read (hence the smiley face when mina linked it! but hey!)

p.s. mina you should vote me, ur confirmed town now you can get people to follow you, we are clearly scum and definitely probably weren't shot last night. YOU GO GIRL


also i have thoughrs but HEY gonna go play fifa!!

Hey, Faraday, Tammy says dickishness is a scumtell for you.

Hey mina, kitttmo says your read sucks

(Also sure let's pretend its a true meta tell! I mean its probably the opposite but!)


Anyway gonna ignore you I guess until you next say something infuriatingly irritating. Some of like to be useful in game and not just bait obvtown . congrats on shooting triforce

Also fakeclaiming isn't alignment null for RECK, so the fact you thought...oh ignoring you.

In post 1196, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:Hey, Faraday, Tammy says dickishness is a scumtell for you.

it isn't so much that he is being dickish but he is trolling and having fun

faraday likes to be scum

also cdb why am I not lynchable? you should be speedlynching me considering how bad I am at lylo and would you really want me around? (this is where I get weird on you)