Nacho how come you didn't poison SG night 1?
p.edit
Vote: Titus
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:06 pm
by Iecerint
↑Albert B. Rampage wrote:Titus full claim please. The thing sticking out the most to me right now is that Titus was the only one to say that SGs flavor was congruent to hers when SG was getting votes.
She actually reneged on that when pressed for like the 3rd or 4th time.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:07 pm
by Iecerint
Don't lynch her until farside does whatever she wants to do with me.
Also, make Titus claim so that they use a fakeclaim.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:08 pm
by Andrius
Second Titus fullclaiming
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:09 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
I see. Who did you target last night then? You should probably just tell us who's confirmed town, Nacho loverizes the non-confirmed, Andrius, farside, you and Nacho are already cleared, I think we got this one POE'd
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:10 pm
by Iecerint
I'm pretty sure I know what your odd favor is, though!
It might have to do with some stuff I've mentioned in recent posts a little bit!
Does that address your favor?
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:11 pm
by Iecerint
Yeah, I thought it was Victor/Titus going into today, maybe PereV as an alternate possibility. Not sure what makes farside confirmed, but I agree that she is pretty unlikely to be scum.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:11 pm
by farside22
Well the manual was a bit fuzzy
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:11 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
Basically I think Who and Peregrine should be loverized, unless you cleared one of them, then it should be farside and non-cleared, and then we win tomorrow.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:13 pm
by farside22
Also don't quick vote yet.
I have a few questions and thought to express.
Won't happen till Friday though
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:14 pm
by Albert B. Rampage
If Andrius was scum, making him a tree takes away his scum win condition?
Unvote
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:14 pm
by Andrius
↑Albert B. Rampage wrote:If Andrius was scum, making him a tree takes away his scum win condition?
Unvote
Don't think that's how that works.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:15 pm
by Iecerint
What about if Nacho announces a lover plan and I can veto it if it includes a confirmed town?
This way, I can keep it secret if Nacho guesses who I confirmed correctly, but there's still no risk of linking up confirmed town.
I doubt roleblocking Nacho will be an issue because Titus is probably the roleblocker. Outside chance that scum have both a roleblocker and something like a busdriver, but that's all.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:15 pm
by Iecerint
I'm assuming that Nacho's ability triggers after Andy dies.
It would either block ABR or whoever targeted him. It's a one shot ability, hence why I didn't use it last night.
I didn't think anyone would target ABR, so it was a safebet as any. I can't just run around and ask, "Hey who are you going to target?". That's precisely why I knew ABR was Iecrint's target. I placed a trap onto ABR's front door.
The flavor is a bear trap designed to catch werewolves. As of last night, I thought ABR was the general misread of the group, reading him as town when he's scum, so blocking him was ideal.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:22 pm
by Titus
Besides, if scum deliberately blocked you Iecrint, claiming it is pretty fucking stupid.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:23 pm
by Titus
My role is essentially like a roleblocker or rolestopper so when Mollie claimed a regular role, I figured it made a lot of sense. *shrug* I was wrong, so I'm re-evaluating a bit.
Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:36 pm
by Iecerint
Nope! Nice try.
Waiting on Nacho. Farside was gonna do something tomorrow (Friday).