Page 48 of 170

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:30 pm
by Dapper Stranger
Spifflop wrote:And once again hiding behind terms such as "fluff" without providing examples so he doesn't have to go address all the shit he is hellbent on avoiding in my ISO.

~Spiffy

A man is pointing out that's what the ISO Widget beside ones name is for. No need te littering the thread with a wall of mindless dribble when it's so handily accessed by clicking the link.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:31 pm
by Passionate Storm
Dapper Stranger wrote:
Passionate Storm wrote:
Spifflop wrote:Why do you feel that way?

~Spiffy


He's far too invested in protecting Klingon and attacking the townblock. His attacks are bullshit and designed to probe weak points in town blocks. He's systemically moved through the block, rather than being frustrated that any particular read was getting ignored. They started with me but I didn't get a wagon. Then Elyse. Then me again. Then itepip. Then you. He's getting frustrated about us being a clique and Klingon bring scumread but not any read getting traction. His attacks, especially that IRL one, are that we suck.

Townblok

D1

Yeah right

A man is wanting no part of that hokey crap

More like scum looping naive town they think they can control into thinking they are town because they're including them in a group. Yeah, catch that whole effing thing on fire and burn it down


Literally just won by doing this while scum raged. Textbook Sudoken.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:32 pm
by Spifflop
EE you do realize you haven't provided a reason for scum reading me?

~Spiffy

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:33 pm
by Passionate Storm
Spifflop wrote:Titus our opinions are so similar idk whether to embrace it or be terrified.

PEdit: Jaqen who do you think is scum other than myself? Also why are you trying to ignore how obvtown I was in my latest bout of posting?

~Spiffy


in this game, embrace it bc we are both obvtown. Just go your homework. If I haven't laid a foundation, press it.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:34 pm
by Spifflop
Dapper Stranger wrote:
Spifflop wrote:And once again hiding behind terms such as "fluff" without providing examples so he doesn't have to go address all the shit he is hellbent on avoiding in my ISO.

~Spiffy

A man is pointing out that's what the ISO Widget beside ones name is for. No need te littering the thread with a wall of mindless dribble when it's so handily accessed by clicking the link.

OH MY GOD EVERYONE NEEDS TO READ THIS.

Jaqen was perfectly content with going through my ISO to NITPICK AT TRIVIAL POSTS, but when I ask him to consider the other aspects of my ISO he refuses to comply.

@Eagle thoughts on this?

~Spiffy

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:35 pm
by Dapper Stranger
Spifflop wrote:Titus our opinions are so similar idk whether to embrace it or be terrified.

PEdit: Jaqen who do you think is scum other than myself? Also why are you trying to ignore how obvtown I was in my latest bout of posting?

~Spiffy

A man is seeing nothing town about it. Over reactions, forcing a townblok with no solid info anywhere yet, and swearing do not a townie make.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:35 pm
by Spifflop
Titus get a load of this shit.

~Spiffy

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:36 pm
by Extrapolated Eagle
Passionate Storm wrote:
Spifflop wrote:Titus our opinions are so similar idk whether to embrace it or be terrified.

PEdit: Jaqen who do you think is scum other than myself? Also why are you trying to ignore how obvtown I was in my latest bout of posting?

~Spiffy


in this game, embrace it bc we are both obvtown. Just go your homework. If I haven't laid a foundation, press it.


What do you do when spiff flips scum then?

Spifflop wrote:EE you do realize you haven't provided a reason for scum reading me?

~Spiffy

Yes. I did. 872. Also I agree with dapper s reasoning

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:37 pm
by Spifflop
EAGLE ADDRESS MY RESPONSE TO DAPPER THEN. You don't get to say that shit while ignoring my responses.

~Spiffy

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:39 pm
by Spifflop
Notice how I'm fucking inviting Jaqen and EE to analyze me thoroughly but they insist on ignoring my responses.

~Spiffy

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:41 pm
by Passionate Storm
I see it. This is another short game resolved by Titus blocking

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:41 pm
by Dapper Stranger
Spifflop wrote:
Dapper Stranger wrote:
Spifflop wrote:And once again hiding behind terms such as "fluff" without providing examples so he doesn't have to go address all the shit he is hellbent on avoiding in my ISO.

~Spiffy

A man is pointing out that's what the ISO Widget beside ones name is for. No need te littering the thread with a wall of mindless dribble when it's so handily accessed by clicking the link.

OH MY GOD EVERYONE NEEDS TO READ THIS.

Jaqen was perfectly content with going through my ISO to NITPICK AT TRIVIAL POSTS, but when I ask him to consider the other aspects of my ISO he refuses to comply.

@Eagle thoughts on this?

~Spiffy

Yes and read a man's case where he is explicitly leaving out other of Spitflop's posts for the sake of brevity. A man isn't needlessly cluttering a thread because a scumbutt requests it

Where is a handy Gladiate when it is needed? Aan is gladly martyring himself for the cause. There are far more of us than there are of you Spiff.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:41 pm
by Passionate Storm
Save EE for last in case of townbeard.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:42 pm
by Spifflop
Jaqen is resorting to taking unsupported potshots and Eagle tries to hide behind Jaqen's shitacular case without expounding on it.

~Spiffy

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:43 pm
by Extrapolated Eagle
Spifflop wrote:
Dapper Stranger wrote:
Spifflop wrote:And once again hiding behind terms such as "fluff" without providing examples so he doesn't have to go address all the shit he is hellbent on avoiding in my ISO.

~Spiffy

A man is pointing out that's what the ISO Widget beside ones name is for. No need te littering the thread with a wall of mindless dribble when it's so handily accessed by clicking the link.

OH MY GOD EVERYONE NEEDS TO READ THIS.

Jaqen was perfectly content with going through my ISO to NITPICK AT TRIVIAL POSTS, but when I ask him to consider the other aspects of my ISO he refuses to comply.

@Eagle thoughts on this?

~Spiffy


Why do you ask my thoughts when you repeatedly call me scum? You attacked me for my case on Elyse and repeatedly targeted Klingon for barely a halfway decent reason. From the tone of your posts it is quite easy to tell you are emotionally involved at this moment in time and I highly suggest you take a step back, calm down, and analyze the situation. I am willing to work with you if you are willing to work with me.

After you get back and have cooled off, post a full, thought out reads list, and I want you to really, truly consider two people for me: Elyse, and Klingon. Part of the reason I am willing to give up a stronger scumread for you is because your lynch likely clears these two ladies. However, I do not want to lynch you if you are town and simply emotionally involved in this game at the point of making such decisions, which is why they seem scummy. So when you come back give me your read (and I want you to fully reconsider your read on just those two people without looking at anyone else's cases including mine, and get back to me with an in depth analysis of your read. At this point I will Unvote you.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:47 pm
by Extrapolated Eagle
Spifflop wrote:EAGLE ADDRESS MY RESPONSE TO DAPPER THEN. You don't get to say that shit while ignoring my responses.

~Spiffy

Spifflop wrote:Notice how I'm fucking inviting Jaqen and EE to analyze me thoroughly but they insist on ignoring my responses.

~Spiffy

Calm down, I was working on it. If you want someone to respond in depth, then you shouldn't expect it quickly. There is a trade-off between quality and quantity, and I think you're getting encouraged to act in ways that are less than beneficial to town by Titus. I am not certain what she is doing, but she is certainly quite fully of herself and not lacking in the buddying department.

I would suggest that you analyze your relationship there as well, because it may be poison whispering in your ear

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:48 pm
by Passionate Storm
Ee, asking for thoughts from scumreads is pretty duh. It leaves tells if they are scum and helps readjust if wrong.

I believe your reads are the ones based in emotion not his.

Let me give you a hypothetical.

You are trying to determine if an individual is sick. You do not have a doctor. Two people who know the individual say she's sick. The patient says no and denies these people know her. She points to someone less familiar to say she's healthy.

What conclusion do you draw regarding the patient's health?

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:50 pm
by Spifflop
Btw I'm excited to add this game to the laundry list of games where scum attack me day 1 because they think I'm an easy target but p. much out themselves in the process.

PEdit: @Eagle notice I left you out of my scum reads? I am asking you because you might just be misguided town and I am trying to determine for myself. This is called "scum hunting". Stop dodging the question and answer. I never attacked you for your Elyse case, I just said that I don't think Elyse is scum.

And I will not be providing a reads list. If the Klingon wagon ever loses traction I will probably provide a full case for her but at this point I don't need to. I'm not going to jump through hoops to get you to unvote me. If you want to keep kidding yourself that Jaqen has a case by all means keep your vote. But expect to be scum read because of it.

~Spiffy

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:51 pm
by Dapper Stranger
Spifflop wrote:Notice how I'm fucking inviting Jaqen and EE to analyze me thoroughly but they insist on ignoring my responses.

~Spiffy

A man is analyzing you thoroughly you lying asshat. A man is seeing your strange interactions around Elyse and Klingon and is diving into your ISO with an open mind it is there and then he is finding not only his off then on when it was popular for a second then back off the moment it lost its popularity with Elyse and finding evidence to match your baseless accusation against Klingon as well as his sucking up to perceived strong players. Only THEN is a man convincing that Spitflop is scum. So piss off with you lies and assumptions! If you don't know what is going through my mind with what I say, ask. Don't just go around making shit up.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:52 pm
by Extrapolated Eagle
None of the people in this scenario are a doctor? Then I discussed things with the patient directly. Particularly why said people might lie about her sickness.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:53 pm
by Dapper Stranger
Passionate Storm wrote:I see it. This is another short game resolved by Titus blocking

A man is noting all those mislynches on you are completely unwarranted. This one isn't as good at this as she is perceived.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:53 pm
by Spifflop
Lol Jaqen I did ask you to provide examples of where I was twisting Klingon's words to fit my case (P.S. this is what you did to me!). You have not done so.

~Spiffy

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:54 pm
by Spifflop
Also be nice.

~Spiffy

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:54 pm
by Extrapolated Eagle
Spifflop wrote:Btw I'm excited to add this game to the laundry list of games where scum attack me day 1 because they think I'm an easy target but p. much out themselves in the process.

PEdit: @Eagle notice I left you out of my scum reads? I am asking you because you might just be misguided town and I am trying to determine for myself. This is called "scum hunting". Stop dodging the question and answer. I never attacked you for your Elyse case, I just said that I don't think Elyse is scum.

And I will not be providing a reads list. If the Klingon wagon ever loses traction I will probably provide a full case for her but at this point I don't need to. I'm not going to jump through hoops to get you to unvote me. If you want to keep kidding yourself that Jaqen has a case by all means keep your vote. But expect to be scum read because of it.

~Spiffy

Spifflop wrote:Starting to think EE is a Klingon scumbuddy.

~Spiffy


And ok. But you can expect to be added to the ignore list until you take a second to breathe and stop posting with your gut reactions.

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:55 pm
by Passionate Storm
Extrapolated Eagle wrote:None of the people in this scenario are a doctor? Then I discussed things with the patient directly. Particularly why said people might lie about her sickness.


None are. Ok, you think that people knowing her would lie. Why? Why not ask the two who know her and investigate their evidence? Why do you search for evidence they are lying?

I haven't said anything about lying, accuracy or anything else, just that the two knew the patient better.