Mafiascum.net

In post 1173, MagnaofIllusion wrote:no scum-hunting

ohhhhhhhhhhhhkay.....

In post 1173, MagnaofIllusion wrote:and decided that policy lynching people they don't like is appropriate for Day 1.

that... sounds like kat

In post 1173, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Then under minimal pressure they threw down as "I'm VT, lynch me if you want" AtE crap post that is pretty much a scum claim.

that tells me they're impulsive

In post 1173, MagnaofIllusion wrote:What don't you get about that?

i mean... the only thing you listed that i think is actually scummy is the "no scumhunting." and i don't ... THINK... i agree with that's the case w/ camn... let me look again.

In post 1174, Grib wrote:camntsuki can't back up their reads. Probably because they're fake, but if they want to prove me wrong, I'm all ears.

Yeah so most non-newbie scum don't just make up reads without having fake reasons. If this ever catches you scum outside road to rome please call me

In post 1174, Grib wrote:They aren't engaging anyone to try and read them.

Meh

In post 1174, Grib wrote:They claimed with very few votes on them and are getting angry that their claim won't save them.

part i - so what
part ii - i dont think thats true

In post 1174, Grib wrote:They claim they can "town it up" but refuse to do so to avoid the N1 kill, which is dumb because it doesn't mesh with their claim.

I have seen camn make this claim elsewhere

I can always count on you to shoot stuff down and then call it a day.

In post 1175, Fox McCloud wrote:i mean... the only thing you listed that i think is actually scummy is the "no scumhunting." and i don't ... THINK... i agree with that's the case w/ camn... let me look again.

looking and i still dont think i agree w "no scumhunting"

do you have a specific issue with a specific read?

Hey Fox, could you pick out three posts that show camntsuki is scumhunting?

Even squinting I can barely see it.

hey ceph

looks like youre my bobbsey twin again

i have a secret scumread. do you know who it is?

In post 1177, Grib wrote:I can always count on you to shoot stuff down and then call it a day.

I can always count on you to be wrong

In post 1180, Fox McCloud wrote:i have a secret scumread. do you know who it is?

I do not :0

In post 1181, Cephrir wrote:

In post 1177, Grib wrote:I can always count on you to shoot stuff down and then call it a day.

I can always count on you to be wrong

Careful, your TMI is showing.

Well, Fox, Cephrir, good thing we don't have to convince everyone. That's the beauty of majority.

In post 1179, Grib wrote:Hey Fox, could you pick out three posts that show camntsuki is scumhunting?

Even squinting I can barely see it.

anything more precise? i dont feel like this conversation is going anywhere

In post 1184, DiamondSentinel wrote:Well, Fox, Cephrir, good thing we don't have to convince everyone. That's the beauty of majority.

that... doesn't make the read any more accurate...

In post 1184, DiamondSentinel wrote:Well, Fox, Cephrir, good thing we don't have to convince everyone. That's the beauty of majority.

I could not agree more. If I thought your opinion was going to matter I wouldn't be in this game anymore

In post 1182, Cephrir wrote:

In post 1180, Fox McCloud wrote:i have a secret scumread. do you know who it is?

I do not :0

i'm trying to see if luna can guess it either.

c'mon, you dont even have an inkling?

In post 1000, Cheetory6 wrote:

In post 997, Medical Junkies wrote:

In post 991, Cheetory6 wrote:Fucking reeling at the idea that townKuroi genuinely believes the shit he just spouted.

^ This guy over here.

-K

I've erased thirty posts responding to this.
Just know.
That I have fucking words for you postgame if you're actually town.

Awesome. I look forward to it.

In post 1029, Fox McCloud wrote:sry mala i got a phone call im back now

I know this isn't AI or anything, but do you have dial-up?

In post 1036, Cheetory6 wrote:

In post 1034, Fox McCloud wrote:please dont let kuroi make you replace out cheet.

It's not Kuroi.
I'm not well enough to play right now.

I hope you feel better, Cheetory. To good health.

In post 1105, MagnaofIllusion wrote:

In post 1103, Grib wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: camntsuki

This is 5 of the required 10.

Come on people let's get this done!

This is a part of you that I haven't seen before. I've not seen you this ambitious to get someone lynched, and I'm not exactly sure how to take this, to be honest.

In post 1113, Cephrir wrote:

In post 1028, Cheetory6 wrote:

Please replace me

no come back ):

why do you expect kuroi to not say dumb things he always says dumb things

Did you not see the part where Cheetory said this isn't about me? Seriously, you're slipping off your own level.

In post 1135, Medical Junkies wrote:Granted I don't even understand why K's name was in this conversation in the first place. He wasn't the one who claimed, I was. So the fact his name is even in this is fucking flat out stupid.

~M

You're a sweetheart, Mala!

In post 1147, Eleven wrote:

Transcend replaces Cheetory6

Welcome.

In post 1184, DiamondSentinel wrote:Well, Fox, Cephrir, good thing we don't have to convince everyone. That's the beauty of majority.

lol

-K

bro? imperium?

probably the second one

Fox, those are just words. When I say scumhunting, I mean when you can clearly see someone's reads changing and shit. Posts that indicate someone is /thinking/ about the game in a way that they'd need to as town, because they don't know who the mafia are.

I'm just trying to understand your read on camntsuki.

In post 1190, Cephrir wrote:

bro?

imperium?

yep

you beat luna

Like.

Blankly calling people town and scum != scumhunting.

589 is close, but still bad.

In post 1193, Grib wrote:I'm just trying to understand your read on camntsuki.

nononononononononono

I'M trying to understand YOUR read. YOU are the one claiming to have the strong read. i'm not.

i have scattered thoughts on them. at first i kind of thought being self conscious about being perceived as a lurker may have been potentially scummy but since then there are a few posts that made me think "maybe town?" but it doesnt go beyond gut feelings or anything easy to articulate

i just dont think it's a slam dunk case like ppl are acting like it is

In post 1192, Grib wrote:I mean when you can clearly see someone's

reads changing

and shit

you expect to see that over the time frame this game's been going...?

Ah.

It's certainly one of the most concrete.

Feel free to sell me/everyone on a wagon you believe to be more viable.

In post 1197, Fox McCloud wrote:

In post 1192, Grib wrote:I mean when you can clearly see someone's

reads changing

and shit

you expect to see that over the time frame this game's been going...?

Yes.