so nothing would make you think a Mini Normal set-up would preclude both claims?
or that it would be an unlikely set-up for this game type?
these are not leading questions; I've never played a Normal.
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 10:32 am
by drealmerz7
and you think JR set up a mod-wifom game?
I don't
so many reasons to lynch rb
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:23 am
by JaeReed
Impoetic is V/LA until the 4th.
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:24 pm
by Transcend
Jeez laweez
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 12:26 pm
by Titus
In post 1175, TTTT wrote:so nothing would make you think a Mini Normal set-up would preclude both claims?
or that it would be an unlikely set-up for this game type?
these are not leading questions; I've never played a Normal.
Maybe you can post why this is your first scum read too since you're taking so long to catch up you're obviously being super meticulous so why not share your thought process with us???
In post 947, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:the predecessor of the slot should have no effect on how you read Gerry
anyone who uses facepalm emoji unironically is scum 9/10 l0l
In post 1090, gerryoat wrote:Yo, I think transcend is town. And if his claim is legit then i think rb is maf from a setup standpoint. but hmmmm. question is, would rb REALLY claim BP as maf? that's like the most scummy PR claim. Is it too scummy to be scum? Or is it wifom that we would all think it's too scummy to be scum and unvote it. anyway, i think i'm gonna vote this for now
In post 1134, gerryoat wrote:TTTT you're focused on the wrong things. since ive joined all you've done is tunnel for no reason
In post 1135, gerryoat wrote:if you cant tell what a joke is then idk what to tell you lol
replaced in
said he would catch up
posted a vote without explanation
when asked to explain: 1087- the scummiest post of the game so far by any player
then jumps on the rb wagon
after
rb claimed with 1090- the 2nd scummiest post of the game so far
can't even answer a simple question about what he is joking about
I would be embarrassed if I tunneled town so hard.
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:34 pm
by Drone
Could you explain what you meant by "reaction vote"?
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:43 pm
by drealmerz7
In post 1181, Titus wrote:Hey, I am not thrilled with you either Mr. no vote.
In post 1175, TTTT wrote:so nothing would make you think a Mini Normal set-up would preclude both claims?
or that it would be an unlikely set-up for this game type?
these are not leading questions; I've never played a Normal.
This wifom game you are selling is a possibility in the newbie queue so it works here. Period. Move on.
I'm not "selling" anything. Of course it is a possibility, yes I know it is a noob setup what is being talked about. MY ANALYSIS of the situation is, that this game is not that, and so the JK and BP are not both town-aligned. That is my theory, I'm sticking to it. Your theory is otherwise, and you can stick to that.
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:46 pm
by Drone
Scum BP? An interesting role.
A BP claim, if true lets us safely assume there is a vigilante.
I was getting a lot of townpings from TTTT before but there have been some things (as noted) that aren't sitting as well but no way would I be close to voting him
rbrbrbrbrbrb
no the scum don't probably have a BP, that's just a scummy claim
he's banking on no vig or at least no vig. willing to shoot a potential BP and waste their bullet
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:37 pm
by ssbm_Kyouko
Titus - TTTT wanting a rivaling Gerry wagon looked like a way to try to get better data for VC analysis once one or the other flipped. There are 2 people voting Gerry rn. TTTT and ironstove. ironstove was the one who originally came up with the meta case on rb that got people voting him, but now ironstove is nowhere to be found on the wagon. If Gerry's wagon is scum-driven, do you think TTTT or ironstove are more likely to be scum for being on it?
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 3:08 pm
by ironstove
LOL fluffy replaced out what the fuck..... He said he had a lot of stuff going on IRL but I didn't think it was that serious.
In post 1111, TTTT wrote:hi Titus
everyone pretty much thinks you are town
town is in luck
Titus' strength is set-up crackin'
rb claimed BP when at L-1 (but hadn't been playing like a BP at all)
trans claimed JK to "counter-claim" rb (which makes no sense)
You seem to have me at a disadvantage. I am not recalling any games we have played together.
Sick burn
I agree with you that Transcend's claim makes no sense as a counter-claim to RB.
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 4:30 pm
by shannon
In post 1191, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Titus - TTTT wanting a rivaling Gerry wagon looked like a way to try to get better data for VC analysis once one or the other flipped. There are 2 people voting Gerry rn. TTTT and ironstove. ironstove was the one who originally came up with the meta case on rb that got people voting him, but now ironstove is nowhere to be found on the wagon. If Gerry's wagon is scum-driven, do you think TTTT or ironstove are more likely to be scum for being on it?
OK everyone knows Titus is rad but can we stop directing so much her way? What I mean to say is that if she's scum and we rely on her reads, we're gonna have a bad time. (And of course, she might be town and wrong, which happens).
SSBM - I might be mistaken but I didn't think many people voted RB because of Ironstone's meta case. (You are referring to Ironstone's point about how many images or gifs he used in his play, right?). Also, weren't half of us scum reading Ironstone at the point he made that post?
If anything, I would say that Ironstone's meta case was a minor point against RB, and that most people are/were sheeping Transcend or responding to Transcend's pressure. Have I misunderstood?
In post 1191, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Titus - TTTT wanting a rivaling Gerry wagon looked like a way to try to get better data for VC analysis once one or the other flipped. There are 2 people voting Gerry rn. TTTT and ironstove. ironstove was the one who originally came up with the meta case on rb that got people voting him, but now ironstove is nowhere to be found on the wagon. If Gerry's wagon is scum-driven, do you think TTTT or ironstove are more likely to be scum for being on it?
Asked and previously answered.
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 7:30 pm
by Transcend
Can we TIT
Trust in Transcend
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 8:54 pm
by gerryoat
In post 1183, Drone wrote:Could you explain what you meant by "reaction vote"?
