Mafiascum.net

And okay, we can wait.

In post 1174, Kokichi Oma wrote:You're wrong. Lynch him.

No thanks, he's actually engaging for now

I asked about Kiana because of the congress host hold-out. But I see in the VC that she's V/LA.

The list of resolutions is in, I asked the mod for confirmation of whether I am allowed to discuss the contents as I do not want to be modkilled for violating rules.

In post 1176, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1174, Kokichi Oma wrote:You're wrong. Lynch him.

No thanks, he's actually engaging for now

...Where?

In post 1176, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1174, Kokichi Oma wrote:You're wrong. Lynch him.

No thanks, he's actually engaging for now

No he's not. He made 3 posts about nothing.

In post 1170, Elbirn wrote:You know what all these posts I want to talk about are over 500 posts old it doesn't even matter anymore. The game starts now, fuckoff.

In post 1153, Titus wrote:Looking at the wagons, at least 1 is probably scum. Too much investment otherwise.

I'm not following your train of thought here. You're saying one of the wagons is on scum, why exactly? Frankly I'm not much inspired by either of them, Nero hasn't pinged me and Creature has done literally nothing. He's a "Play the game or begone, thot" kind of lynch.

At least 1. There's too much counterwagoning for at least 1 wagon not to be scum protecting their own. If Varsoon's multiball theory is accurate, maybe two.

In post 1178, brassherald wrote:The list of resolutions is in, I asked the mod for confirmation of whether I am allowed to discuss the contents as I do not want to be modkilled for violating rules.

Excitement. Can we have Titus name hers first in the event they are different and she's scum hiding something.

In post 1178, brassherald wrote:The list of resolutions is in, I asked the mod for confirmation of whether I am allowed to discuss the contents as I do not want to be modkilled for violating rules.

Correct. I do think there's one I think I should do to you but it may backfire if I misunderstand it. Do you see what I see?

Good timing, Titus.

In post 1183, Titus wrote:

In post 1178, brassherald wrote:The list of resolutions is in, I asked the mod for confirmation of whether I am allowed to discuss the contents as I do not want to be modkilled for violating rules.

Correct. I do think there's one I think I should do to you but it may backfire if I misunderstand it. Do you see what I see?

I'm 99% sure I had the same thought, actually.

Answer is we can share contents, but not the actual quotes. I, unfortunately do not currently have the time to actually sit down and paraphrase the resolutions I have. But, Titus, I believe the Congressional Peacekeeping on me may be your best move. Feel free to summarize what you can in my stead and I will add anything I feel needs adding should I feel that.

In post 1181, Titus wrote:

In post 1170, Elbirn wrote:You know what all these posts I want to talk about are over 500 posts old it doesn't even matter anymore. The game starts now, fuckoff.

In post 1153, Titus wrote:Looking at the wagons, at least 1 is probably scum. Too much investment otherwise.

I'm not following your train of thought here. You're saying one of the wagons is on scum, why exactly? Frankly I'm not much inspired by either of them, Nero hasn't pinged me and Creature has done literally nothing. He's a "Play the game or begone, thot" kind of lynch.

At least 1. There's too much counterwagoning for at least 1 wagon not to be scum protecting their own. If Varsoon's multiball theory is accurate, maybe two.

[4] Nero Cain: BuJaber, Shaziro, Ranmaru, Gamma Emerald
[5] creature: Kokichi Oma, Nero Cain, Almost50, Chara, marshy
[4] Klazam: pidgey, Varsoon, Titus, Jodaxq

So these are the wagons right now. If you're voting Klazam, would I be correct in assuming that you believe that either the Nero Cain or Creature wagons are scumdriven? Even if we forget about multiball for a moment, do you think one of those two is a scum supported counterwagon to Klazam?

Titus. We are waiting on you.

In post 1186, brassherald wrote:Answer is we can share contents, but not the actual quotes. I, unfortunately do not currently have the time to actually sit down and paraphrase the resolutions I have. But, Titus, I believe the Congressional Peacekeeping on me may be your best move. Feel free to summarize what you can in my stead and I will add anything I feel needs adding should I feel that.

I concur. It should either jail or roleblock you. The former is best. The latter is neutral but useful to know.

In post 1187, Elbirn wrote:

In post 1181, Titus wrote:

In post 1170, Elbirn wrote:You know what all these posts I want to talk about are over 500 posts old it doesn't even matter anymore. The game starts now, fuckoff.

In post 1153, Titus wrote:Looking at the wagons, at least 1 is probably scum. Too much investment otherwise.

I'm not following your train of thought here. You're saying one of the wagons is on scum, why exactly? Frankly I'm not much inspired by either of them, Nero hasn't pinged me and Creature has done literally nothing. He's a "Play the game or begone, thot" kind of lynch.

At least 1. There's too much counterwagoning for at least 1 wagon not to be scum protecting their own. If Varsoon's multiball theory is accurate, maybe two.

[4] Nero Cain: BuJaber, Shaziro, Ranmaru, Gamma Emerald
[5] creature: Kokichi Oma, Nero Cain, Almost50, Chara, marshy
[4] Klazam: pidgey, Varsoon, Titus, Jodaxq

So these are the wagons right now. If you're voting Klazam, would I be correct in assuming that you believe that either the Nero Cain or Creature wagons are scumdriven? Even if we forget about multiball for a moment, do you think one of those two is a scum supported counterwagon to Klazam?

Correct but to be intellectually honest it could be scum buddying me as well. The VCA is independent of my accuracy of my reads.

In post 1188, Elbirn wrote:VOTE: GammaEmerald

This feels random, is that based off what Titus has said? Who do you think I'm defending if so?

I think we should avoid the permanent resolutions until we get more information.

There is the issue of luxuries.

Also we can prevent players from self delegating or being a WC host.

In post 1190, Titus wrote:

In post 1186, brassherald wrote:Answer is we can share contents, but not the actual quotes. I, unfortunately do not currently have the time to actually sit down and paraphrase the resolutions I have. But, Titus, I believe the Congressional Peacekeeping on me may be your best move. Feel free to summarize what you can in my stead and I will add anything I feel needs adding should I feel that.

I concur. It should either jail or roleblock you. The former is best. The latter is neutral but useful to know.

I'm leaning towards jail because we cannot perform this on consecutive days. I would speculate that this part was added specifically to counteract me revealing day 1, then continually getting someone to Protect me with that resolution.

We can embargo gold, crab, or silk. We can embargo City-states as well. I have no frame of reference for any of the embargo abilities.

Wait, we embargo a player or city states.

We can ban gold, silk or crab.

In post 1194, brassherald wrote:

In post 1190, Titus wrote:

In post 1186, brassherald wrote:Answer is we can share contents, but not the actual quotes. I, unfortunately do not currently have the time to actually sit down and paraphrase the resolutions I have. But, Titus, I believe the Congressional Peacekeeping on me may be your best move. Feel free to summarize what you can in my stead and I will add anything I feel needs adding should I feel that.

I concur. It should either jail or roleblock you. The former is best. The latter is neutral but useful to know.

I'm leaning towards jail because we cannot perform this on consecutive days. I would speculate that this part was added specifically to counteract me revealing day 1, then continually getting someone to Protect me with that resolution.

Makes sense. That's my thought as well.

I don't like the idea of barring people from WC hosts. As down the line we may have inno reports on people who were scummy.

Jail keep Brass 100% no need for debating that.