Page 48 of 201
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 4:58 am
by Chara
i find this more distracting. especially when you're townreading Mark, Kiana.
i still think Skybird is scummy. so far her defenders have not actually interacted with any part of the
case
.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:01 am
by Bronya Zaychik
In post 1175, Chara wrote:i find this more distracting. especially when you're townreading Mark, Kiana.
i still think Skybird is scummy. so far her defenders have not actually interacted with any part of the
case
.
What's distracting about debating theory with Mark?
The case is
boring
! I don't want to interact with it >:(
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:03 am
by Maid Cafe
In post 1175, Chara wrote:i find this more distracting. especially when you're townreading Mark, Kiana.
i still think Skybird is scummy. so far her defenders have not actually interacted with any part of the
case
.
I mean what is the case summarized.
I have a gasp of it but it is kinda explained over many posts throughout many pages of the game.
~B
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:04 am
by Reasonably Rational
In post 1170, OnTheMark wrote: In post 1168, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 1166, Bronya Zaychik wrote: In post 1164, OnTheMark wrote: In post 1156, Reasonably Rational wrote:I also don't have much of an opinion on Skybird, and always see fluff cases spring up on them D1(like, every single game), so I haven't actually paid much attention to OTM's actual reasons for being suspicious of Skybird(also partially because it's somewhat related to Iconeum, another slot I don't have much to say about).
-Cerb
Your non defense defense is noted.
And I have defended Skybird D1 in Mass effect when it happened.
And I was right.
Past games that I have not personally been a part of (which means, all meta references except my completed games here, including "Mass Effect") are non-evidence to me and hold no sway.
Pfft. Do you deny that Skybird always attracts early game wagons? And that statistically, those wagons are usually on town!skybird?
-Cerb
The last sentence is the same odds as everyone else and Cerb I am disappointed.
Gambler’s fallacy from you?
You must have missed the
at the end of the last sentence.
The important part is the fact that Skybird always attracts early game wagons, which is something I've noticed, and thus when I play a game with Skybird, I tend to ignore all pushes on her that happen D1 because her play just makes people push her early, regardless of alignment, in my experience.
-Cerb
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:04 am
by Reasonably Rational
In post 1177, Maid Cafe wrote: In post 1175, Chara wrote:i find this more distracting. especially when you're townreading Mark, Kiana.
i still think Skybird is scummy. so far her defenders have not actually interacted with any part of the
case
.
I mean what is the case summarized.
I have a gasp of it but it is kinda explained over many posts throughout many pages of the game.
~B
Seconded. I promise to take the case seriously and interact with it with the all my capabilities if it is succinctly and wholly expressed in a single post.
-Cerb
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:11 am
by Kiana Kaslana
Yeah right now whatever's being pushed onto Skybird is absolutely not convincing at all.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:21 am
by OnTheMark
I have a hunch the team is Sky, Bryona, RR and munna
Need time to type up my Sky case and I am at work but that’s my hunch.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:24 am
by Reasonably Rational
In post 1181, OnTheMark wrote:I have a hunch the team is Sky, Bryona, RR and munna
Need time to type up my Sky case and I am at work but that’s my hunch.
I have a hunch that that particular team would be undetectable on D1. <3
But I look forward to reading a real case and taking it seriously.
-Cerb
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:24 am
by Maid Cafe
The team is MC, RR, Venmar, A50 you got one of us.
~B
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:27 am
by Kiana Kaslana
In post 1182, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 1181, OnTheMark wrote:I have a hunch the team is Sky, Bryona, RR and munna
Need time to type up my Sky case and I am at work but that’s my hunch.
I have a hunch that that particular team would be undetectable on D1. <3
But I look forward to reading a real case and taking it seriously.
-Cerb
Approved.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:27 am
by Kiana Kaslana
One thing's for certain, Mathblade has gone off the deep end. Going to take a look at what Titus has to say about all this.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:30 am
by Maid Cafe
We should play fun games like.
Cop, Vig, Doc where we give 3 names for each catrgory.
~B
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:31 am
by OnTheMark
In post 1186, Maid Cafe wrote:We should play fun games like.
Cop, Vig, Doc where we give 3 names for each catrgory.
~B
Tried that.
Byrona doesn’t play
For liking puppies and giving me one supposedly they don’t play with them.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:31 am
by Chara
i don't really have a great case, come to think of it. the way Skybird talked about voting me but didn't do so,(weak) the way she responded to Iconeum's vote on me (just a bad feeling), etc. and Mark's quoted posts.
at the moment, my best bet for scum, but if you have something else i might listen.
Titus asked me about Iconeum, but of the two i like Iconeum's approach a little more, as i said.
beeboy keeps making me paranoid of Maid Cafe.
i don't care about the wagon enough to tell everyone to vote Skybird.
beeboy, why's baku town?
pedit: Kiana, can you stop saying things like that about Mathblade? i don't think it's helpful, and as someone who has had frustrating encounters with Mathblade myself, i don't think it's even warranted.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:33 am
by Reasonably Rational
Is that where we guess who has that role, based on what they've said so far in this game, or are we simply talking about who we *want* to have those roles because they'd use them well?
-Cerb
pedit: Agreed with Chara. I want OTM to connect with people. The current game state has them standing a bit outside of the consensus' forming, which sucks for everyone because OTM can be really friggin helpful.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:33 am
by Kiana Kaslana
In post 1187, OnTheMark wrote: In post 1186, Maid Cafe wrote:We should play fun games like.
Cop, Vig, Doc where we give 3 names for each catrgory.
~B
Tried that.
Byrona doesn’t play
For liking puppies and giving me one supposedly they don’t play with them.
I don't play, but Titus plays.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:36 am
by Maid Cafe
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:36 am
by OnTheMark
In post 724, Bronya Zaychik wrote:
VOTE: Iconeum
Sure. I would have preferred you stayed on T and L a bit longer for VCA but this works well for pressure.
As for the other question, reask towards the end of d1. My hydra partner and I both think the game is moving too slow. I'd still use the same standards though atm.
Closest thing, I got when I tried. Titus just isn’t giving a gamestate til it suits her and she can agree with the majority of things that are wrong.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:37 am
by Chara
In post 1189, Reasonably Rational wrote:pedit: Agreed with Chara. I want OTM to connect with people. The current game state has them standing a bit outside of the consensus' forming, which sucks for everyone because OTM can be really friggin helpful.
Cerb, the game is like fuck, marry, kill, except it's with PR actions. and a way to discuss reads
i'm not sure saying who is obvtown is useful when they're not in danger of being lynched, though.
as for this, yes. Mark's great. not my style at all, but saying they're derptunneling or that they've gone off the deep end just seems unfair when they haven't done anything of the sort.
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:38 am
by Chara
In post 1160, Chara wrote:Iconeum doesn't feel like scum as i don't think they would look at the chorus of "Chara is obvtown for its dumb play" and say "but guys, i think you're ignoring all of the objectively scummy things". it's taking too much fire for an unpopular read, even if it does make sense.
players scumreading Iconeum, can you talk about this?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:38 am
by Venmar
catching up on 10 pages
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:38 am
by Bronya Zaychik
In post 1182, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 1181, OnTheMark wrote:I have a hunch the team is Sky, Bryona, RR and munna
Need time to type up my Sky case and I am at work but that’s my hunch.
I have a hunch that that particular team would be undetectable on D1. <3
But I look forward to reading a real case and taking it seriously.
-Cerb
This is civ and SU2 redux. :/
*cries*
~Titus
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:39 am
by Reasonably Rational
In post 1193, Chara wrote: In post 1189, Reasonably Rational wrote:pedit: Agreed with Chara. I want OTM to connect with people. The current game state has them standing a bit outside of the consensus' forming, which sucks for everyone because OTM can be really friggin helpful.
Cerb, the game is like fuck, marry, kill, except it's with PR actions. and a way to discuss reads
i'm not sure saying who is obvtown is useful when they're not in danger of being lynched, though.
as for this, yes. Mark's great. not my style at all, but saying they're derptunneling or that they've gone off the deep end just seems unfair when they haven't done anything of the sort.
Ah. Hmm. That makes more sense.
-Cerb
@Titus: I wasn't in Civ.
And I was scum in SU2, therefore this can't be it redux. :-/
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:39 am
by Maid Cafe
In post 1193, Chara wrote:Cerb, the game is like fuck, marry, kill, except it's with PR actions. and a way to discuss reads
I'd play fuck, marry, kill but it probably breaks a few site rules.
~B
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 5:40 am
by OnTheMark
In post 1198, Maid Cafe wrote: In post 1193, Chara wrote:Cerb, the game is like fuck, marry, kill, except it's with PR actions. and a way to discuss reads
I'd play fuck, marry, kill but it probably breaks a few site rules.
~B
I think only the kill does
I know a couple of people who I’d love to flirt with but I hold back.