Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:12 pm
V v much soIn post 1153, pisskop wrote:Chenn is really spammy. has he been like this all game? this doesnt feel like a good chen
V v much soIn post 1153, pisskop wrote:Chenn is really spammy. has he been like this all game? this doesnt feel like a good chen
okay. this and the ones before it show a real progression i kind of like.In post 645, skitter30 wrote:cinn, do you like town or scum more?
which do you think you're better at? which do you prefer playing?
remind me how much experience you have?
In post 1177, Menalque wrote:I think you’re all way off on Cinn
And I think at least one person pushing this is scum probably
So exi or chen
See, this is that new player smell that reads as slightly town.In post 650, Cinnamon wrote:I agree on chen, they're pretty null for now.
Pisskop too, they're still scummy but just not a lynch yet.
I think you're close to null here as well. I feel town vibes from you but from my limited experience with you that's not a great reason to townread you. Probably slightly town-null because your reads are aligning with mine in a number of places.
relax.In post 1186, chennisden wrote:pisskop, i'm not particularly good as town and we both know it
if the time comes i won't hold the game hostage over one scumread.
To be clear: you SRed luv here because of the intent coupled with a noncontentful postings?In post 655, Menalque wrote:why do you dislike the timing re:pisskop? that was the whole impetus for why I started finding luv scummy, with the intent prompting me to go back and read his ISO
No I SR him because I thought his ISO was full of nothing/excuses for doing nothing — the intent played a small part of that SR but was mostly just the reason why I went back and looked at his ISO specificallyIn post 1190, pisskop wrote:To be clear: you SRed luv here because of the intent coupled with a noncontentful postings?In post 655, Menalque wrote:why do you dislike the timing re:pisskop? that was the whole impetus for why I started finding luv scummy, with the intent prompting me to go back and read his ISO
I think you could be pocketing me and I'm a light scumread on you, but I don't want to lynch you today. Is that contradictory to you?In post 1172, pisskop wrote:In post 637, Cinnamon wrote:I don't like pisskop but I also don't think he's the lynch for today, which is why I turned my attention elsewhere.one of these things is not like the other one.In post 639, Cinnamon wrote:I don't know much about his playstyle, but this kinda pinged me that he may be trying to pocket me more than anything else he said. I'm not sure why, it seemed kinda unnatural?. Either way he's trying to get me on his side so there's a very real chance it is pocketing.In post 305, pisskop wrote:no worries.In post 303, Cinnamon wrote:My point wasn't to say that you're scummy for doing so but to say that posts that avoid taking stances at this point are not a good reason to scumread somebody.
Like he is right in a way: I wouldnt SR him for placing intent. Not waiting for a claim isnt as bad as it looks as long as he waits reasonably long for it? My SR on him is more about what I see as a conflict of personality.In post 659, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:You’re voting me for stating intent on a claim I believe to be fake from someone you were strongly scum reading and still are.