Page 48 of 86

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:12 pm
by Menalque
In post 1153, pisskop wrote:Chenn is really spammy. has he been like this all game? this doesnt feel like a good chen
V v much so

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:13 pm
by pisskop
In post 645, skitter30 wrote:cinn, do you like town or scum more?
which do you think you're better at? which do you prefer playing?

remind me how much experience you have?
okay. this and the ones before it show a real progression i kind of like.

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:14 pm
by Menalque
I think you’re all way off on Cinn

And I think at least one person pushing this is scum probably

So exi or chen

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:15 pm
by chennisden
sorry pisskop. i let my emotions get the better of me.

i don't care what alignment you are or i am when i say this, and i'm not gonna wait for postgame: what i did wasn't acceptable.

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:15 pm
by chennisden
VOTE: cinn

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:15 pm
by chennisden
i think it's optimal to lynch cinnamon today from a town pov

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:16 pm
by chennisden
he has the most associatives.

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:16 pm
by pisskop
VOTE: unvote

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:16 pm
by chennisden
In post 1177, Menalque wrote:I think you’re all way off on Cinn

And I think at least one person pushing this is scum probably

So exi or chen
:facepalm:

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:17 pm
by pisskop
Right. I wouldnt let a quickhammer come in before I was less than 20 pages, behind. Not very sporting of me, I know.

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:18 pm
by pisskop
In post 650, Cinnamon wrote:I agree on chen, they're pretty null for now.

Pisskop too, they're still scummy but just not a lynch yet.

I think you're close to null here as well. I feel town vibes from you but from my limited experience with you that's not a great reason to townread you. Probably slightly town-null because your reads are aligning with mine in a number of places.
See, this is that new player smell that reads as slightly town.

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:18 pm
by chennisden
pisskop, i'm not particularly good as town and we both know it

if the time comes i won't hold the game hostage over one scumread.

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:19 pm
by pisskop
Id probs SR any player of experience who so blatently sheeped a read after doing what they did just last page

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:19 pm
by pisskop
In post 1186, chennisden wrote:pisskop, i'm not particularly good as town and we both know it

if the time comes i won't hold the game hostage over one scumread.
relax.

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:19 pm
by chennisden
k

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:21 pm
by pisskop
In post 655, Menalque wrote:why do you dislike the timing re:pisskop? that was the whole impetus for why I started finding luv scummy, with the intent prompting me to go back and read his ISO
To be clear: you SRed luv here because of the intent coupled with a noncontentful postings?

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:22 pm
by chennisden
In post 1123, Cinnamon wrote:
@mod lI'm going V/LA until people I want to interact with are here
cinnamon

this is

1) playing against wincon

and

2) against the spirit of the new rule

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:24 pm
by Cinnamon
Your entire gameplay is playing against wincon

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:25 pm
by chennisden
im only playing against ur wincon cinnamon

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:25 pm
by chennisden
ur win con

is not mine

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:26 pm
by Menalque
In post 1190, pisskop wrote:
In post 655, Menalque wrote:why do you dislike the timing re:pisskop? that was the whole impetus for why I started finding luv scummy, with the intent prompting me to go back and read his ISO
To be clear: you SRed luv here because of the intent coupled with a noncontentful postings?
No I SR him because I thought his ISO was full of nothing/excuses for doing nothing — the intent played a small part of that SR but was mostly just the reason why I went back and looked at his ISO specifically

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:26 pm
by Cinnamon
In post 1172, pisskop wrote:
In post 637, Cinnamon wrote:I don't like pisskop but I also don't think he's the lynch for today, which is why I turned my attention elsewhere.
In post 639, Cinnamon wrote:
In post 305, pisskop wrote:
In post 303, Cinnamon wrote:My point wasn't to say that you're scummy for doing so but to say that posts that avoid taking stances at this point are not a good reason to scumread somebody.
no worries.
I don't know much about his playstyle, but this kinda pinged me that he may be trying to pocket me more than anything else he said. I'm not sure why, it seemed kinda unnatural?. Either way he's trying to get me on his side so there's a very real chance it is pocketing.
:shifty: one of these things is not like the other one.
I think you could be pocketing me and I'm a light scumread on you, but I don't want to lynch you today. Is that contradictory to you?

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:26 pm
by pisskop
In post 659, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:You’re voting me for stating intent on a claim I believe to be fake from someone you were strongly scum reading and still are.
Like he is right in a way: I wouldnt SR him for placing intent. Not waiting for a claim isnt as bad as it looks as long as he waits reasonably long for it? My SR on him is more about what I see as a conflict of personality.

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:27 pm
by Menalque
That’s not replacing out or threatening to tho?

Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:27 pm
by Cinnamon
If I get mislynched today I don't think menalque should ever be lynched. Scum menalque has no reason to come in and hard defend me vs Exilon chennis and skitter pushing when sheeoing them would not pull a scumread.