Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:47 am**

Which leaves Eve, Titus, Espresso as possible mailman and one of which is the mason. This helps us at least not lose in LyLo.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:48 am**

I guess theoretically Egix could also be the mailman. Lame.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:54 am**

In post 1172, Churros wrote:It's puzzling to me why the JOAT wouldn't claim a guilty in N1 though.

Supposing the JOAT is real, he would have something like a cop shot I imagine as one of his powers if he has a "guilty". His second power seems to be mailman.

What's his third or fourth power?

He says he isn't claiming because of the rest of his powers but instead of using the second more useful power and claiming in the thread afterwards, they send a message to eyesott and wants to claim only tomorrow

Supposing we lynch pisskop today and he flips town, tomorrow we would probably lynch eyesott

if by any chance both of they are town, scum just made a perfect setup

In post 1173, Churros wrote:if PK flips town there's no way in hell everyone won't want to lynch Eyesott if the JOAT doesn't come forward.

With ali already claiming mailman I do think this can be easily a set-up.

That’s a really good point. But they didn’t recommend that I even mention I received mail. Their two suggestions were 1) fake claim a guilty of my own on pk
2) just join in on their wagon today

@TemporalLich

: would copy pasting a message from a mailman break the rules of “quoting mod communications”?

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:56 am**

fake claim a guilty on pk?

really.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:56 am**

I really don’t like how gobble is trying to publicly solve Who JOAT/Mason are. Doesn’t seem like a pro town activity

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:56 am**

I know right! Weird, huh!

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:57 am**

Now that I say this out loud, im trusting this mailman less and less

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:57 am**

UNVOTE: while I think about this

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:59 am**

If there is a JOAT like you said I don't want they to claim right now though at all for instance.

Even if we're doubting them.

I'm just considering all possibilities here. If it's a town JOAT and pisskop is really scum, it can be very advantageous for him to be hidden today.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:00 am**

I can later decide that they should claim because I highly doubt that mail but right now I'm still mulling it over.

I think we straight up can win if the JOAT is town and the mail is true while at the same time we can straight up lose if the mail is false/a setup.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:01 am**

Agreed. Which is why I find gobbles attempts to out them so scummy

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:03 am**

This is highly speculative as well but if that JOAT claim is true, I might have an idea of what type of powers he might have left and it would really be very pro-town for him to remain hidden if this is all true.

Asking you to fake claim of your own rather than mention anything about the mail gives me goosebumps though.

If you hadn't mentioned the mail like he suggested, we wouldn't believed you tomorrow if pk is town.

p-edit: I dunno about that

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:04 am**

PK was also coincidentally voted out of the gate today although considering yesterday it's not really surprising.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:28 am**

Eyesott if you have goosebumps from the mail why did you immediately trust it though?

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:33 am**

I found weird how you trusted the mail from the get-go when you seemed confident PK was town yesterday even proposing no-lynch rather than a pk lynch. But it's even more weird if you think the mail is indeed oddly-worded, had pk as town yesterday, but had no doubts about the mail until recently?

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:35 am**

I do not understand eyestott.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:47 am**

In post 1188, Churros wrote:Eyesott if you have goosebumps from the mail why did you immediately trust it though?

I didn’t think of the possibility of the JOAT being scum till later on the day.
Not ashamed to admit that I’m a naive person.
The wording of the mail gets weirder the more you look at it, I only read through it once before my opening salvo of post at the start of the day

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:51 am**

Please quote it if you can.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:10 am**

Waiting for confirmation on whether that’d be allowed

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:05 am**

In post 1179, eyestott wrote:I really don’t like how gobble is trying to publicly solve Who JOAT/Mason are. Doesn’t seem like a pro town activity

This too...

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 7:35 am**

VC 3.3pisskop (2) - Titus, Eve
eyestott (2) - pisskop, gobbledygook

Not voting: EspressoPatronum, alimdia, Churros. eyestott

With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Day 3 will end in (expired on 2020-04-29 17:00:00) or when a lynch is reached.

Churros is V/LA until April 21st.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:09 am**

I really think today is the day to fullclaim, given all the claim shenanigans going on right now

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:14 am**

But at the same time, if the JOAT is who I think it is, I'm fairly confident in just killing pk. Hats off to them if they're actually scum and planned this from D2.

I'm a little sus of gobble's attempt to stir up an eyestott wagon. If pk flips scum, gobble should be next.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:15 am**

For clarity -- "Hats off to them" being to the hypothetical scum!JOAT

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 8:24 am**

Here's a wild idea:

Eyestott is a ROLE flavourer. What if he added flavour for each ROLE instead of each PERSON + he's been trying to figure out who has what flavour?!

I say we make eyestott fullclaim the flavour of each PERSON. He's done a few hints thus far, but not all of them have been targeted at the right person. I'll post an example below:

Mafiascum.net

Mini 2127 - Fairly Special [Game Over]