Mafiascum.net

It's a false dilemma, you could exile someone else during popo's replacement search

is it possible i have been wrong yet again with my d1 town bloc declarations?

i bravely called una and bella unequivocally town and wrote them off. now they are both starting to seep into the forefront of my mind. no wonder mafia didn't kill me last night, when i have been such a loyal ally.

In post 1133, UnaBombaH wrote:And just to be frank - I am not going to get any friendly visits from anyone this game.
Even trying would be a waste.
I keep my door closed tight.

are you softclaiming some kind of power here...?

Openwolfing

@isis

can you make a tiered list of your reads?

i feel you chime in a lot, but i don't really know where you stand on most players.

What is openwolfing

another post in which i reevaluate my reads.

after reading geraintm's posts on d2, i think he may actually be town. his looking for popo-related connections appears earnest, and when i reflect on why i thought he was scum in the first place... i believe those feelings were inadequate. i was too heavily relying on early-wagon science (the first wagon-pivot after the RVS wagon often being scum). i had this idea in my head, and wasn't really reading his posts as closely as i should.

based on the way the back half of yesterday went, i believe all our major wagons were town.

scum really were sitting back sipping lemonade it seems.

bella/notscience/una is probably where i'm looking today, and i need to reevaluate isis. i believe i liked her attempts of reading me yesterday, citing a nice balance of paranoia that was nuanced and hard to fake - but i believe her paranoia has tipped over into being uncritically expressed as fact now.

lazy or suspicious?

In post 1181, Hoopla wrote:notscience

You can try but good luck with it

In post 1182, notscience wrote:You can try but good luck with it

ol' hoops doesn't have the social cachet to be calling the shots today. you know it, i know it, we all do. that's why you aren't afraid of throwing out such cheek, so openly... so flagrantly. you don't expect an uprising coming your way.

all i hope is that the wise members of this beloved town can see the forest for the trees.

enjoy your lemonade while it lasts.

I did the same thing to dunn yesterday and pretty sure I did the same thing to various scumreads on me last game too

In post 1184, notscience wrote:I did the same thing to dunn yesterday

mmm yes, and look how it worked out for him...

If you’re so sure feel free to go for me. By your own admission there aren’t enough vocal people so someone’s going to have to pressure me

Openwolfing refers to being flagrantly scum and kind of leaning into it, like by blatantly rolefishing players as seen here. It can be correct play for a poor position even though it's often used perjoratively. I've been there.

I have lots of nulls but I don't mind summarizing my reads a little bit

We'll say porkens is too high to be in the chart, that's what i get for skimming the first few pages to remember who's in this game.

^a sparkling expression of creativity.

perhaps you are town after all.

Is that your readslist because that’s fantastic

that's my readslist, is it similar to yours?

I’m still figuring out who people are tbh

Gera porkens are my top two townreads

I need to spend some time rethinking everything I think because I feel like I’m off a cliff. I’ll try to focus more tomorrow I’m just fried tonight

I still don’t like bobs stance re me it reads fake as fuck

I don’t like hoops but it’s bad play to clown before tomorrow

I wanted to go for bella but hoops pushing it leaves a bad taste in my mouth

I like your posting in general

Flippys been too absent for my liking

Is that Doug?

A synesthetic reads list of a sort. Kind of adds some flavor to the place. A piece of psychological art.

In post 1157, Galron wrote:

In post 1155, geraintm wrote:@galron

I dislike players who tag people as scum, place lots of votes. If a player ends up thinking 80% of the players are scum then that isn't helpful, and I felt it was what you were doing in the first half ofnyesterfay

I actually agree with RFS on the general point, but with me specifically, I was doing neither of the things you describe. In fact, I've told you a couple of times now that I only placed two votes after rvs, and I certainly didn't scum read a bunch of people the entire day, let alone the first half.

So why the shade?

I guess with so many town reading geraintm they just don't see that he's either mistaken here or just outright lying?

In post 1170, Isis wrote:VOTE: Bella

This is bothersome. When you did it yesterday I was kind of wondering why, but I wanted to see what happened. I need to say something this time round though lest we get the same result.

Now that's an unquotable readlist one can't find with ctrl+f when looking for a specific players name..