Mafiascum.net

In post 775, Not Known 15 wrote:

Vote Count 2.4

Looker(4)superbowl9,

the worst

,osuka,Titus,

Not Voting(2)Dunnstral,Nepenthes,

Truth(2)

WaltertheDunce10

,chkflip,

osuka(2)Looker,Truth,

Titus

0verki11

(1)Gypyx,

Dunnstral(0)

chkflip

Nash

(0)

WaltertheDunce10

(0)

Gypyx(0)

the worst

LicketyQuickety

(0)

superbowl9(0)

Nepenthes

redtea

(0)

No Execute (0)

With 11 alive it is 6 to execute, and 6 to No Execute.

Day 2 ends in (expired on 2020-08-06 04:38:00) or when an execution has been achieved.

Nepenthes replaces redtea.

The wagon on Looker looks particularly town. Town points for Chkflip for being on Truth this early.

In post 1174, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Titus, what do you make of dunn's slot.

Dunn's a nonentity. I wouldn't mind lynching him. If he is scum, I would look at Looker being his partner. It would explain why scum have largely been ineffective.

Why do you believe scum have been ineffective?

In post 1177, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Why do you believe scum have been ineffective?

If Dunn is scum, he's deadweight to their team. There was a scum lynch day 2. It's a decent assumption if Dunn is scum.

It doesn't hold though unless one of Dunn/Looker is scum.

Yeah, that is a good point.

You know me titus, always deadweight to the scum team

In post 1161, Nepenthes wrote:Chk telling me to fuck off but then answering anyways is a representation of this entire game in miniature
While im at it 1077 is bull bc everybody knows tw was the only night 2 kill ever so i dont buy osukas "nooo not him"

Yeah I can see what you're saying. I guess I'm just giving the similar playstyle too much of the benefit of the doubt?

In post 1173, Titus wrote:

In post 146, Not Known 15 wrote:

Vote Count 1.1

bugspray(4)superbowl9,Dunnstral,Truth,Gypyx,

Not Voting(4)

LicketyQuickety

,WaltertheDunce10,Looker,0verki11,

Truth(3)Nash,osuka,bugspray,

WaltertheDunce10(1)redtea,

Gypyx(1)Psyche,

LicketyQuickety

(0)

osuka(0)

superbowl9(0)

Dunnstral(0)

Looker(0)

Nash(0)

redtea(0)

Psyche(0)

0verki11(0)

No Execute (0)


With 13 alive it is 7 to execute, and 7 to No Execute.

Day 1 begins and ends in (expired on 2020-07-28 02:40:00) or when an execution has been achieved.

Town points for chkflip, minor scum points for Gypx (would be major but he's neighbors with flipped scum). Minor town points for Osaka.

Neihbor with flipped scum? What does that mean?

And i don't find that scum has been ineffective? Like what tells you that? Truth was pretty much guaranteed to get lynched at some point

In post 1163, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Looker has been hard to read while osuka insistence and brashness I guess made me think town would not have to resort to jabs instead of working it out. Why would town require validation.

What the hell, VOTE: looker
Urgh a reread does not make gyp look any better
Gods, I wish I was more interested in this game.
pedit thank you nep.

So, tone?

• I don't understand how osuka's excessive use of profanity makes him town.
  • I'd like it if someone went through the posts he linked in 1093 and either agreed or disagreed with them being illegitimate, but I don't take this air of apathy today as a personal insult. I've laid out my reasoning and it's sound - the osuka/superbowl voting bloc is suspicious and so is it's not being acknowledged.
  • As far as the condescension: gross, I won't be doing that.
• Is superbowl voting me because I allow math to support my scumhunting? His 1097 seems more of an attack on the game of mafia than a rebuttal of my suspicions of him. I'm assuming scum being required to burn shots on ICs is why my wagon is being pushed so strongly but so baselessly.

I would say that this is boring, but tone is a lynchable offense.

In post 1184, Looker wrote:I don't understand how osuka's excessive use of profanity makes him town.

I think you are misrepresenting something here... who said that?

How do you define brashness, Dunnstral. Also, who is scum

Clearly I'm misrepping. Such a unique take.

In post 1186, Looker wrote:How do you define brashness, Dunnstral.

Not 'excessive use of profanity'

chkflip why are you voting gypyx? You said it was a placeholder but 1 what are you waiting for and 2 why him specifically as a placeholder?

No matter how much osuka I read he's still null -.-

I'm thinking maybe a titus and looker team? Scum titus makes this game make a lot of sense, town titus makes me very confused

@1182 Gypx - It means your vote is right before or after Truth's. If you're scum, scum spent a lot of resources to keep Truth alive.

In post 1183, Gypyx wrote:And i don't find that scum has been ineffective? Like what tells you that? Truth was pretty much guaranteed to get lynched at some point

Truth's guaranteed lynch is why scum were ineffective.

In post 1181, chkflip wrote:Yeah I can see what you're saying. I guess I'm just giving the similar playstyle too much of the benefit of the doubt?

Your play this game isnt similar to osukas, youre hunting
But you are both filled with hatred

In post 1190, superbowl9 wrote:No matter how much osuka I read he's still null -.-

I'm thinking maybe a titus and looker team? Scum titus makes this game make a lot of sense, town titus makes me very confused

If Looker was scum id consider scum titus more strongly but looker isnt scum

Why isn't Looker scum?

Itd be really funny if i just said tone

Lookers behavior leading up to the truth elim wasnt a buddys behavior, esp not that hammer that takes zero advantage of it being a scum hammer
Their self righteousness is town and its not reading lamist or orchestrated to me
Also theyre voting osuka

In post 1184, Looker wrote:

• I don't understand how osuka's excessive use of profanity makes him town.
  • I'd like it if someone went through the posts he linked in 1093 and either agreed or disagreed with them being illegitimate, but I don't take this air of apathy today as a personal insult. I've laid out my reasoning and it's sound - the osuka/superbowl voting bloc is suspicious and so is it's not being acknowledged.
  • As far as the condescension: gross, I won't be doing that.

Typically I’d just point this out as being a piss-poor dodge of a hard question, but this time around this is a hill I’m absolutely willing to die on. To reiterate: point out where I “hard defended truth” because you have claimed that several times as one of the major points of your push, have showed literally no evidence, and when prompted about it, have refused to answer under the guise of being offended by condescension.

But believe me, I can do so much worse than that. In a more direct manner this time so as to not be misinterpreted by anyone: answer the question or (not so kindly) fuck off

You didnt hard defend truth but you sure did enjoy talking abt why you wouldnt vote them