Page 48 of 161

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:27 am
by tris
day 2 begins!

VC 2.0Image

not voting:
Vulture, Alchemist21, Gamma Emerald, Umlaut, Datisi, MathBlade, Aristeia, Titus, Lukewarm, ChaosOmega, Not_Mafia

with 11 alive it takes 6 to destroy.


not voting:
(expired on 2021-08-19 15:28:00)

note: the url of this image says Arr.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:28 am
by Alchemist21
VOTE: Chaos

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:29 am
by Lukewarm
Damn, you beat me to it

VOTE: chaos

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:29 am
by tris
the replacement was a ruse to give me the pagetop.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:30 am
by ChaosOmega
VOTE: Umlaut

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:31 am
by Alchemist21
In post 1175, tris wrote:not voting: MathBlade, Alchemist21, Gamma Emerald, Umlaut, Datisi, Seanzie, Aristeia, Titus, Lukewarm, ChaosOmega, Not_Mafia
Mathblade replaced Seanzie. Vulture is missing from this list.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:33 am
by tris
oh weird, let me fix that

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:34 am
by Datisi
VOTE: umlaut

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:36 am
by Alchemist21
Prism’s replace-out has me pretty much locktowning the slot. Pretty sure that was a Town ragequit given his posts towards EoD.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:40 am
by MathBlade
Why do you think a lot of naked votes happened start of today versus discussion of the flip?
I expect RVS d1 not D2.

I get that everyone here is mentioned as possible scum EoD yesterday but I don’t like the naked votes and I don’t like how weird that kill is. Going to be ISOing T3

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:42 am
by Titus
Ok. Not the worst thing in the world.

Datisi, did anything happen to you last night? Don't answer what.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:42 am
by Alchemist21
In post 1184, MathBlade wrote:Why do you think a lot of naked votes happened start of today versus discussion of the flip?
I expect RVS d1 not D2.

I get that everyone here is mentioned as possible scum EoD yesterday but I don’t like the naked votes and I don’t like how weird that kill is. Going to be ISOing T3
Everyone who was here agreed T3 was Town after they metadived Datisi, so the kill isn’t really surprising because they were never going to be destroyed.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:43 am
by Datisi
In post 1185, Titus wrote:Datisi, did anything happen to you last night? Don't answer what.
as far as i am aware, no.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:45 am
by Titus
Ok, as expected.

Carry on.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:46 am
by Lukewarm
In post 1184, MathBlade wrote:Why do you think a lot of naked votes happened start of today versus discussion of the flip?
I expect RVS d1 not D2.

I get that everyone here is mentioned as possible scum EoD yesterday but I don’t like the naked votes and I don’t like how weird that kill is. Going to be ISOing T3
Chaos was in my top two scummiest players list day 1, so now they are #1 on that list, so my vote has moved back. Chaos has not really done anything to change that opinion since I voiced it before. I would not call that an RVS vote.

As for T3, I think that surprisingly, he was the most widely town read player in the game Day 1. I had all but town locked him over his dats meta dive.

Why do you think that T3 was a strange kill?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:46 am
by MathBlade
In post 1186, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1184, MathBlade wrote:Why do you think a lot of naked votes happened start of today versus discussion of the flip?
I expect RVS d1 not D2.

I get that everyone here is mentioned as possible scum EoD yesterday but I don’t like the naked votes and I don’t like how weird that kill is. Going to be ISOing T3
Everyone who was here agreed T3 was Town after they metadived Datisi, so the kill isn’t really surprising because they were never going to be destroyed.
I can see that but a lot of people were in the town block. I kinda wanna get a look at why T3 and start there.

Something feels off about the lots of naked votes and such.

I am going to be ISOing and stepping back a bit.

Something doesn’t feel right.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:47 am
by MathBlade
In post 1189, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 1184, MathBlade wrote:Why do you think a lot of naked votes happened start of today versus discussion of the flip?
I expect RVS d1 not D2.

I get that everyone here is mentioned as possible scum EoD yesterday but I don’t like the naked votes and I don’t like how weird that kill is. Going to be ISOing T3
Chaos was in my top two scummiest players list day 1, so now they are #1 on that list, so my vote has moved back. Chaos has not really done anything to change that opinion since I voiced it before. I would not call that an RVS vote.

As for T3, I think that surprisingly, he was the most widely town read player in the game Day 1. I had all but town locked him over his dats meta dive.

Why do you think that T3 was a strange kill?
I don’t think I should say more than that what I said above but the kill seems extremely suboptimal unless hijinks are happening.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:48 am
by Datisi
In post 1179, ChaosOmega wrote:VOTE: Umlaut
chaos, could you talk about this vote?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:55 am
by Alchemist21
In post 1191, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1189, Lukewarm wrote:
In post 1184, MathBlade wrote:Why do you think a lot of naked votes happened start of today versus discussion of the flip?
I expect RVS d1 not D2.

I get that everyone here is mentioned as possible scum EoD yesterday but I don’t like the naked votes and I don’t like how weird that kill is. Going to be ISOing T3
Chaos was in my top two scummiest players list day 1, so now they are #1 on that list, so my vote has moved back. Chaos has not really done anything to change that opinion since I voiced it before. I would not call that an RVS vote.

As for T3, I think that surprisingly, he was the most widely town read player in the game Day 1. I had all but town locked him over his dats meta dive.

Why do you think that T3 was a strange kill?
I don’t think I should say more than that what I said above but the kill seems extremely suboptimal unless hijinks are happening.
Oh yeah T3 softclaimed having some role-related info so there was that as well.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 12:03 pm
by Titus
In post 1193, Alchemist21 wrote:Oh yeah T3 softclaimed having some role-related info so there was that as well.
Where?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 12:06 pm
by Alchemist21
Here:
In post 350, T3 wrote:
In post 338, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 328, T3 wrote:
In post 326, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 323, T3 wrote:
In post 320, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 311, T3 wrote:So I think what I thought was going on is not going on and is something completely different that doesn't involve this game at all.
You thought it had importance once, now let the rest of us decide.
It will become clear later.
How much longer is later exactly?
After some flips.
I don’t like this answer. You were wrong about what you saw but you still won’t explain what you were thinking this Day phase?

VOTE: T3
jBasically, I either am a role that Gamma mentioned, or am a role that implies one of the roles Gamma mentioned, or I know by some mechanism through other players breadcrumbing or me being informed at the start. I thought Gamma was breadcrumbing or something of the sort, so I wanted to give him indication I was aware of what he was talking about. I then flipped to the next page and found a completely different explanation than what I was expecting.
k?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 12:09 pm
by MathBlade
In post 1195, Alchemist21 wrote:Here:
In post 350, T3 wrote:
In post 338, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 328, T3 wrote:
In post 326, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 323, T3 wrote:
In post 320, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 311, T3 wrote:So I think what I thought was going on is not going on and is something completely different that doesn't involve this game at all.
You thought it had importance once, now let the rest of us decide.
It will become clear later.
How much longer is later exactly?
After some flips.
I don’t like this answer. You were wrong about what you saw but you still won’t explain what you were thinking this Day phase?

VOTE: T3
jBasically, I either am a role that Gamma mentioned, or am a role that implies one of the roles Gamma mentioned, or I know by some mechanism through other players breadcrumbing or me being informed at the start. I thought Gamma was breadcrumbing or something of the sort, so I wanted to give him indication I was aware of what he was talking about. I then flipped to the next page and found a completely different explanation than what I was expecting.
k?
Yeah I saw that.

Still doesn’t make sense because of thing antitown to say

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 12:10 pm
by Titus
Ok. I saw where T3 was going I think.

Image

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 1:01 pm
by tris
,

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 1:01 pm
by tris
,