You're on IAm.
Not a bad vote, but the prestige-pere-pressure-palooza is so much better.
SO much sweeter.
And SO much more alliterated than the IAm wagon.
↑ Tammy wrote:
He started off the day, or close to it, voting for MoS in Post 1046. He had mentioned thinking that MoS seemed kind of lurkery scummy during day one, and there was an interaction about figuring out MoS' motives in PoE with Porochaz. (Now I feel dumb right now because I can't find what prompted Poro to vote Peregrine for figuring out MoS's motives in PoE.) Anyway, he didn't give reasoning for why he was voting for MoS in that post, and when I asked him for reasoning he told me in Post 1089. Reasoning is sound as he did say he was sheeping Glork, and some of his posts weren't stellar, but he made some really good points day one.
↑ Tammy wrote:The second reason is that he thinks he looks like he's fishing for support for his lynch and is directing the day where he thinks it should go. Yes, he started off the day voting Uberninja for a bad post (it was bad), and then did a wagon analysis (which I hate), but he's not acted in accordance with pushing the day where he thinks it should go.
↑ Tammy wrote: He hasn't interacted with MoS to determine his thought process with this. Now he has interacted with me and Uberninja and asked others questions, and tried to get me to elaborate on why I find MoS town, but he hasn't interacted with MoS even though he's voting for him. This doesn't read to me as someone who is trying to find out if his suspicions are accurate.
↑ UberNinja wrote:↑ Glork wrote:↑ UberNinja wrote:↑ PeregrineV wrote:Slaxx is my biggest up-in-the-air. What I read and my sixth sense are warring when it comes to him.
Do me a special favor and give me something a little more concrete than this.
Thanks.
Or you can skip the part where he spews a bunch of nonsensical bullshit, and just lynch him.
kthx
Unvote; Vote: PV
Because Glork said so.
↑ CooLDoG wrote:
Town to scum:
Slaxx
Jason
poro
MoS (I still don't know what is up with this guy.)
Captain Murasa
PeregrineV
GreyICE (Tied with pere. Both of these guys are slightly scummy in my opinion)
DeltaWave
Uberninja
Grey is more likly to be scum with either uber or delta due to his hard core defense and buddy of both of them. And if pere or poro flips town it increases the chance of grey dlta and uber of being scum.
@Uber, why did it take you so long to unvte and vote pere? What about that scummy as hell argument on inh?
CooLDoG wrote:UberNinja wrote:Unvote; Vote: iamausername
This post just came right out of the blue. Guys, please, please can we lynch this guy. I beg you. He can pull his reasons for votes right out of his ass and no one cares.
↑ PeregrineV wrote:↑ Tammy wrote:
He started off the day, or close to it, voting for MoS in Post 1046. He had mentioned thinking that MoS seemed kind of lurkery scummy during day one, and there was an interaction about figuring out MoS' motives in PoE with Porochaz. (Now I feel dumb right now because I can't find what prompted Poro to vote Peregrine for figuring out MoS's motives in PoE.) Anyway, he didn't give reasoning for why he was voting for MoS in that post, and when I asked him for reasoning he told me in Post 1089. Reasoning is sound as he did say he was sheeping Glork, and some of his posts weren't stellar, but he made some really good points day one.
It would help if you can point out some of those good points day1.
Pere wrote:
↑ Tammy wrote:The second reason is that he thinks he looks like he's fishing for support for his lynch and is directing the day where he thinks it should go. Yes, he started off the day voting Uberninja for a bad post (it was bad), and then did a wagon analysis (which I hate), but he's not acted in accordance with pushing the day where he thinks it should go.
He has been V/LA, so how could he act on it?
Pere wrote:
It is interesting that you asked and commented on it, while no one else has. Except for UberNinja ramping up his call for my death.
And if you could expand on my subtleness of my vote and post 1089, that would help me understand what you mean.
Pere wrote:
↑ Tammy wrote: He hasn't interacted with MoS to determine his thought process with this. Now he has interacted with me and Uberninja and asked others questions, and tried to get me to elaborate on why I find MoS town, but he hasn't interacted with MoS even though he's voting for him. This doesn't read to me as someone who is trying to find out if his suspicions are accurate.
Really? A simple dual ISO of me and MoS would show he went V/LA about 5 hours after I explained my vote to you, and has been gone ever since. Given that, what sort of conversation would you be looking for between us?
↑ Captain Leela wrote:↑ Porochaz wrote:
It's more if UN flips scum than town, UN flipping town means I need to re-evaluate this game, possibly look at the people trying to lead town, like Mos and Grey. It wouldn't mean Delta was in the clear, to answer your question, but my reasons for having suspicion on DW would not make sense if UN was town. Although not as apparent, the love between UN and Delta isn't one way.I can't see either of them as scum trying to buddy to a town player, partly due to their experience but mostly due to the desperation in UN's posts combined with Delta's apparent lack of concern that there is someone who is doing the defending for him.
Can you explain to me what you mean by the underlined? Where do you see desperation in UN's posts and what does that lead you to believe about UN. And should Delta be concerned that someone is defending him? What does that say about Delta?
↑ Captain Leela wrote:↑ PeregrineV wrote:↑ Tammy wrote:
He started off the day, or close to it, voting for MoS in Post 1046. He had mentioned thinking that MoS seemed kind of lurkery scummy during day one, and there was an interaction about figuring out MoS' motives in PoE with Porochaz. (Now I feel dumb right now because I can't find what prompted Poro to vote Peregrine for figuring out MoS's motives in PoE.) Anyway, he didn't give reasoning for why he was voting for MoS in that post, and when I asked him for reasoning he told me in Post 1089. Reasoning is sound as he did say he was sheeping Glork, and some of his posts weren't stellar, but he made some really good points day one.
It would help if you can point out some of those good points day1.
Post 246 is him trying to find out Jason's thought process on his suspect list in light of what he had said previously.
Post 504 is him being stubborn about not voting for two reasons. Okay this might not have relevance, but it gives me a good feeling. Could be because I can be rather stubborn as well.
Post 614 reasoning for Glork
Post 833 shows him actually thinking about the Haylen wagon and he talks about her play again in Post 840
I'm not going to go through all of them, but they show him actively engaged in the day. He's commenting on situations and sharing his teams reads.
Pere wrote:
↑ Tammy wrote:The second reason is that he thinks he looks like he's fishing for support for his lynch and is directing the day where he thinks it should go. Yes, he started off the day voting Uberninja for a bad post (it was bad), and then did a wagon analysis (which I hate), but he's not acted in accordance with pushing the day where he thinks it should go.
He has been V/LA, so how could he act on it?
But before that he wasn't actively pushing the wagon he wanted. The only time was UN at the beginning of the day, but he pulled that back. He's voting Iam right now; nobody else is. And the one time that he popped in, he just basically gave a meh UN/Delta wagons aren't the one of the day. I would imagine if he was trying to direct the day, he'd be a little bit more aggressive about it...maybe even say what wagon should be the day's wagon, but he doesn't.
Pere wrote:
It is interesting that you asked and commented on it, while no one else has. Except for UberNinja ramping up his call for my death.
And if you could expand on my subtleness of my vote and post 1089, that would help me understand what you mean.
Yeah, I have a tendency to ask a lot of questions. Why is it interesting that I did but no one else did? What I mean by subtleness is that you haven't really done anything about it. You voted, but didn't give a reason. We've talked about it, but it's not like you've tried to get others to see your point on MoS. Subtlety might not be the right word, passive may be better.
Pere wrote:
↑ Tammy wrote: He hasn't interacted with MoS to determine his thought process with this. Now he has interacted with me and Uberninja and asked others questions, and tried to get me to elaborate on why I find MoS town, but he hasn't interacted with MoS even though he's voting for him. This doesn't read to me as someone who is trying to find out if his suspicions are accurate.
Really? A simple dual ISO of me and MoS would show he went V/LA about 5 hours after I explained my vote to you, and has been gone ever since. Given that, what sort of conversation would you be looking for between us?
But you voted him Wednesday morning in Post 1046. Later that afternoon you commented on a post of Jason's when he unvoted me after replacing in and you ask UN to explain the contradiction of her thought process with regard to Jason and Poro. And then yes, Thursday afternoon you answer my question about why you're voting him and about 5 hours later he goes V/LA. But, you don't interact with him before that. The only thing I can find in which you even address him is in the post in which you vote him when you address a group of people not addressed in Jason's post. I don't know why my asking you about your vote and you explaining it would have any bearing on your interaction with him. Why wouldn't you prod him to determine his thought process either before or at the time of your vote?
↑ Mastermind of Sin wrote:I'm about 6 pages behind. I've skimmed page 45 and 48. No idea when I'll get to the rest, and I only have one comment so far:
UberNinja, why are you so bad at this game?