Page 49 of 52

Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:55 am
by jmo16mla
Nacho, I suggest you post.

Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:25 pm
by jmo16mla
Really?

Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2013 6:22 pm
by Nobody Special
Votecount 4.03
(unchanged)


Nachomamma8 - 1 - Tamuz
Tamuz - 1 - Nachomamma8

Not Voting: jmo16mla


with 3 playing its 2 to lynch.


Deadline is in (expired on 2013-08-14 06:49:27)

V/LA: Tamuz, through Sunday August 11

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 3:40 am
by jmo16mla
Don't you post a vote count in that tone of voice to me Mr.

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:00 pm
by Tamuz
I'm back and literally the only comment I have is "Hello Nacho!".

So, Hello Nacho.

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:06 pm
by jmo16mla
This game is getting insanely annoying.

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 5:15 pm
by jmo16mla
Tamuz, why did you try to buss TIP early yesterdy, but never voted him until his death was imminent?

The more I read back on it, there was an insane amount of comfort between you two talking yesterdy.

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:08 pm
by Tamuz
I did not try to bus TIP. I attacked TIP based on some things I found scummy.

The manner and explanations involved in N64 and Gen_Wolf's votes on TIP did not sit right with me so I attempted to voice why they bothered me and tried to get explanations from their originators.

I did not vote early because we were in LYLO and I did not confident to vote.

I didn't vote right after Gen_Wolf's failed hammer because I wanted to explore things.

I voted before deadline because I was fine with TIP being the lynch, even if Gen_Wolf would give the town a better chance to win.

Scumhunting is not scummy.

As to comfort, I don't follow.

Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:13 pm
by RachMarie


Nachomamma8 has been prodded with the ol Cattle Prod.

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:20 pm
by jmo16mla
In post 990, TheIrishPope wrote:Then why the unvote?
In post 991, Tamuz wrote:So you and I can't speedhammer, duh?
Seen here

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:21 pm
by jmo16mla
In post 1034, Tamuz wrote:I'm voting gen.
In post 1035, TheIrishPope wrote:Well I'll be damned. It appears you are.
In post 1036, Tamuz wrote:You're gonna have a rough time on your SAT reading comprehension this way.
In post 1038, Tamuz wrote:Your wiki says you are 16. NSATs sure, but big boy SATS/ACTS are around 17
In post 1039, TheIrishPope wrote:And so it does. Tamuz, you are too smart for me.
In post 1040, TheIrishPope wrote:Now convince jmo into hammering Gen so we can take this scum win for ourselves, eh?
This.

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:24 pm
by jmo16mla
In post 1040, TheIrishPope wrote:
Now convince jmo into hammering Gen so we can take this scum win for ourselves, eh?
Tamuz, exactly what do you feel TIP meant by saying this?

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 5:25 pm
by jmo16mla
In post 1186, Tamuz wrote:This is incredibly poor sportsmanship.
AtE

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:07 pm
by Tamuz
If you didn't realize since you and TIP twinposted like the biggest assholes in the world in response to my post in 875, I've derided everyone a bunch in this game.

991 is me making fun of TIP, note the 'duh'. 1036 is me also making fun of TIP, attacking his intelligence, also note post 1042 where NS basically asks that I stop being a dick.

Post 1040 is TIP calling the union of himself and me 'we' and appealing to me directly as his scum partner/make it look like there is day-scum communication in thread wasn't novel. I ignored it there because I addressed it the first time I noticed it, here
Post 1022.

I respond by calling him an asshole and actually put my reasoning down in this post.
In post 1027, Tamuz wrote:[Post 1022] is a blatant positioning post to help a mislynch on me tomorrow. What do you think I'm calling you an asshole for? Like I said, I don't see a town win coming from lynching you today regardless of alignment. If you're town we lose. If you're scum it looks like a townie can be convinced TIP Tamuz scum team is a real thing and you have been working framing posts like the that one to support it. The last one is just beyond stupidly obvious.
You'll notice he keeps doing this, calling him and I 'we' or 'us' and then his 'Win this for us Tamuz' Lynch-post continues it.

So I don't think he's saying anything, he's just pushing the same agenda that he thought would work; getting some stupid townie to think we're on the same team. Sadly I agree with him that this town did not have the means to put 2-2 together which is why I really preferred the Gen_Wolf lynch yesterday.
JMO wrote:AtE
What is the appeal? What is the emotion?

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:20 pm
by Nachomamma8
if you ever see talking to myself i'm just
trying to think of the words i have to say to you

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 8:22 pm
by Tamuz
Posted from my Iphone

Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:16 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 38, uoyeluri wrote:I like the way Malakittens handled the Luigi vote and Jmo'a subsequent questioning.
First post this slot has made in the game!
In post 129, Fropome wrote:Okay now the stuff over into pages 3 and 4 I pretty much agree with what everyone saw was wrong with luigiwise opportunist vote.
Role is now Tala. Have to see who that plays out meanwhile....
I don't like how this predecessor starts out in his catchup planning immediately to tunnel the fuck out of the talah slot, especially with the following post in mind:
In post 129, Fropome wrote:Lol this is just so fucking lol.
(in response to talah's vote on malakittens)
fropome claims a strong town read and proceeds to tunnel the fuck out of one of her attackers pretty much immediately without much on the thought process on either the townmala read (i know her!) or the scum talah read.
In post 270, Hyperion wrote:Tunneling, no other defined reads outside of his one of Thane (now Gen?). In general this is bad, but for an IC, you are really teaching these newbies nothing. Leaning scum
In post 290, Hyperion wrote:I am willing to hammer (if he is at L1 I have no idea) in a few hours once he claims.
This is a horrible hop in general. You didn't figure into his reads at all, but suddenly when you're good to be hammered, Hyperion appears. He also didn't have even the slightest interest in anything other than writing down reads (not trying to form or double check), which suggests scum.
In post 827, Tamuz wrote:Oh and you're going 120mph to bus TIP. Its a good play. TIP's lynch vote yesterday was bad, but it allows for his partner to bus him hard and the down goes into lylo/mylo with very little info and a bunch of flack flying around.
I'm not a fan of the "you're bussing TiP" dance that Tamuz has been orchestrating for pretty much this entire day, especially after TiP's flip. The thought process between "jmo is bussing the fuck out of TiP" and this:
In post 1123, Tamuz wrote:How do my actions make any sense as his partner?

Not my votes, my actions.
In post 1125, Tamuz wrote:So while settling for a TIP lynch today is ok, I don't think it will win the town the game because of all of the TIP and Tamuz scumteam sentiment.
Tamuz is happy to talk and talk and talk about JMO bussing TiP, but when Tamuz is suspected of being a partner, he's extremely concerned of talking about why he's partnered with TiP and how "town can't win the game if they believe us partners", which is blatant AtE.
In post 1150, Tamuz wrote:lol.

jmo do you need to hear me expound on anything or shall I engage the crossposts?
why would there be any reason why you would need jmo's permission to vote confirmed scum...?
In post 1157, Tamuz wrote:I'm no Freudian, but might one call that a Fox Paw?
I really really hope that this isn't serious.
In post 1177, Tamuz wrote:jmo. Do you think I am mafia?

Reading the run up to tip's wagon and then the ease off do you believe my actions are consistent of scum? Reading after it, do you believe my verbal exploration is consistent of scum? Do you think Gen's avoidance to explain his actions, opting instead to whine and bring up out-of game information is consistent of town?
In post 1177, Tamuz wrote:jmo. Do you think I am mafia?

Reading the run up to tip's wagon and then the ease off do you believe my actions are consistent of scum? Reading after it, do you believe my verbal exploration is consistent of scum? Do you think Gen's avoidance to explain his actions, opting instead to whine and bring up out-of game information is consistent of town?

I hate to say this, but you are the hold up here and you aren't introducing any avenues of discussion. If you really want Gen or I to say something YOU might have to put a card down and say "POST X is alignment Y'ey because of reason Z'.
In post 1180, Tamuz wrote:TBH you're really bad at dialogue, which hurts activity in games when Gen and I have made our peace.
You're acting like you expect him to completely change his playstyle in order to facilitate discussion and urging him to hammer quicker if he can't adapt to the condition you know he's not going to meet, and rushing a hammer in this situation is scummy as fuck.

Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:49 am
by jmo16mla
Shit would be so much easier if i could iso both of you.. too bad you each have 10 replacements.

Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:12 am
by Tamuz
Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm not a fan of the "you're bussing TiP" dance that Tamuz has been orchestrating for pretty much this entire day, especially after TiP's flip.
The entire day? You cite post 827 as you're argument and skip to post 1123. Just ignore that in post 878 I state
In post 878, Tamuz wrote:JMO is being a king douche, but the numbers don't think he is scum.
And then I don't talk about jmo bussing TIP ever again. Methinks you're ignoring 300 game posts to fit to your argument, but ignoring a bunch of posts and using the word entire is a complete misrep.
Nacho wrote:Tamuz is happy to talk and talk and talk about JMO bussing TiP, but when Tamuz is suspected of being a partner, he's extremely concerned of talking about why he's partnered with TiP and how "town can't win the game if they believe us partners", which is blatant AtE.
One post that translates to "Explain your thought, does it make sense?" is extreme concern? This sounds like a misrep to fit an argument too.

And now lets look at "town can't win the game...". I don't say that. I say I don't think it is the better move. This is you changing the word I say, which has completely different connotations. I'm not saying lynch TIP and we lose, I'm saying I thought, and still think, lynching TIP yesterday was a worse play for town win %. There is a not-so-subtle difference between the two and you are blatantly changing what I say.
Now if you really think this is an appeal to emotion, why is it scummy?

That's 3 instances so far where you overplay, ignore or outright change words while still attributing it as a direct quote just to force an argument.

Here's misrep #4!
Nacho wrote:why would there be any reason why you would need jmo's permission to vote confirmed scum...?
This isn't asking for permission (see the difference between may and shall). Jmo is the obvious lynchpin coming in to today, it is about not rushing. If he wanted time to think and question I am and was fine with that. Compare the two:
Gen_Wolf wrote:I don't want this game to drag on. If I am wrong and JMO is scum then GG.
Tamuz wrote:jmo do you need to hear me expound on anything
Gen urges to just get it over with asap. I am not rushing and open to discussion.
Nacho wrote:You're acting like you expect him to completely change his playstyle in order to facilitate discussion and urging him to hammer quicker if he can't adapt to the condition you know he's not going to meet, and rushing a hammer in this situation is scummy as fuck.
And another misrep. The day was dragging. I had said my piece Gen was flaking or only responding in whining rants about how unfair this game was to him. I'm urging jmo to actually pace the game, he is the only one undecided and there is no reason to hold any information at this point in the game. Gen and I weren't making any profitable discussion, we also had no doubts about alignment. Jmo is and was the one who isn't in the know. He needed to take some control over the game and probe into the areas that he believes will help him come to a conclusion. This is me urging him to talk and discuss.

You say twice that I'm urging him to hammer. Tell me where?
Is it here
Tamuz wrote:If you really want Gen or I to say something YOU might have to put a card down and say "POST X is alignment Y'ey because of reason Z'.
Where I'm urging him to post his belief(s) and reasoning.

or here?
Tamuz wrote:TBH you're really bad at dialogue, which hurts activity in games when Gen and I have made our peace."
Where again I'm urging him to talk.
"Dialogue", "say", "avenues of discussion".

Not vote.

Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 3:24 pm
by jmo16mla
Il be hammering tonight as i dont think i will be awake for deadline.

Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:28 pm
by jmo16mla
Tamuz, your numbers pointed you out to be scum..

Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:37 pm
by Tamuz
Compare Post 878, pulled I replaced in (0 posts from me in my slot) and Post 948, (33 posts).

Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:46 pm
by jmo16mla
Your slot is still the same alignment.

Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:49 pm
by jmo16mla
VOTE: nacho

Tamuz, you scum?

Posted: Tue Aug 13, 2013 6:51 pm
by Tamuz
It is, but certainly some things changed between me and my predecessors, one being sample size. The other being that I posted, scumhunted and didn't lurk myself out of the game. Lurk posts, unsurprisingly, lead scummy.