Mafiascum.net

Anyway.
enomis/Safety/Amrun/Elyse.
With Grimgroove or NS if any of them is wrong.
We lynch NS and we have the jaguars and the monkeys fight.
Are there disagreements on this?

I have a disagreement on this.
I think your lynch will be far more interesting than a lynch on Nobody Special.

If only for this:

In post 1190, Wisdom wrote:Wait, where did she try to get towncred for it?

I think you should be lynched for asking this.

Anyway, my vote on you has the "perma"-tag for a reason. I asked you to answer a simple question and you didn't. For all I know you were part of the "towncred-for-Amrun"-plan all along.

If only you weren't this stupid, it would be great. You have to realize by now that I have a hard time accepting that things aren't like I thought. I didn't spot what Amrun was doing right away, so I asked you.

And I answered you.
But when I asked you, you called me a retard.
NOW THAT WAS NOT VERY NICE, WAS IT?

No when you explained it I told you that you have a point.

In post 1158, Grimgroove wrote:

In post 1149, Grimgroove wrote:

In post 1144, Wisdom wrote:Amrun and Venmar

(especially Amrun)

are town as balls for the reaction test.

?

You must explain this or I'll vote you never to move my vote away again.

In post 1159, Wisdom wrote:Go. fucking. read. the. game.

I am talking about this.
You did not want to explain it to me.
Either because you felt like being a dick, or because you knew that townread was uncalled for.
Amrun did the same thing.

Now, surprise, surprise, I find out the Amrun townread was indeed uncalled for.

Now Amrun is obvscum because she remained intentionally ambiguous in order to get towncred.
Now Wisdom is probscum because of reacting the same way as Amrun did, and possibly being part of the same scheme.

Now, what is stupid about this argument?

I didn't explain it to you because I considered it obvious that Amrun WAS part of the plan. I didn't even think of the possibility that Amrun wasn't because I considered that bullshit. I had taken the impression from the posts I quoted that she surely was following the plan. So I considered you an idiot for not seeing it the way I did. I was wrong, but you can see how I thought.

In post 1191, Grimgroove wrote:By not questioning your townread on her for glaringly wrong reasons. That's how.

She probably re-read the happenings herself and thought it could be read as her playing along, yet she missed the part I did not miss, namely the thing I bolded in post 1042.

That's ridiculous. Fucking lol.

A) I wasn't sure what he meant by it, but assumed that he meant my general activity around the reaction test.

B) I was attempting not to interrupt your line of questioning to him, but YOU made that impossible.

C) that wouldn't get me "towncred" anyway lol

In post 1199, AngryPidgeon wrote:That said, Im sorry.

But I had every right to post relrvant defense to a case that was centered around my ACTIVITY which amrun flatout admitted.

Zero percent of my reasons for you have had anything to do with the frequency and timing of your posts. ZERO PERCENT. I have explained this to you repeatedly, but you continue to ignore that I take issue ONLY with the content of your posts. I thought you were doing this deliberately but the more it happens the more I think you are just monumentally failing at reading.

Scum have fucking daytalk, if I was a part of the scheme you seriously think I would have let Amrun derp like that and ruin it?

Fucking lol. If I were tryin to do that because I was retarded, why would I blatantly say that I couldn't explain it, and then say that I didn't know it wasn't a hammer?

Are you high?

In post 1207, Amrun wrote:

In post 1191, Grimgroove wrote:By not questioning your townread on her for glaringly wrong reasons. That's how.

She probably re-read the happenings herself and thought it could be read as her playing along, yet she missed the part I did not miss, namely the thing I bolded in post 1042.

That's ridiculous. Fucking lol.

A) I wasn't sure what he meant by it, but assumed that he meant my general activity around the reaction test.

If you weren't sure, why didn't you ask?

B) I was attempting not to interrupt your line of questioning to him, but YOU made that impossible.

He already made it obvious he wasn't going to answer me. The questioning was at a close. What the hell was there to interupt?

C) that wouldn't get me "towncred" anyway lol

How is this funny? Wisdom GAVE you towncred for it, black on white, and you DID NOT question it. So obviously poiint C is entirely invalid.

In post 1208, Wisdom wrote:Scum have fucking daytalk, if I was a part of the scheme you seriously think I would have let Amrun derp like that and ruin it?

You didn't notice the thing I bolded in 1042. The little three words that toppled the towncred-for-Amrun-plan.
It's obviously easy enough to miss, by both of you. That's how you would let her "derp" and become a part of that "derp" yourself.
Amrun didn't ruin it now, when admitting to not knowing it was a hammer. She had no other choice. The derp happened when trying to get her in the conftown pool.

The questioning was not at a close, at least from my pov, but it doesn't matter because I just thought he found me generally town
Because we were overall in step throughout the process. I am confident he's town so him finding me town is not a strange thing I need to question.

It doesn't matter because your entire premise is completely nonsensical. When you asked me I point blank said I could t explain it, before you posted your little "revelation" or what the fuck ever that was just part of my posts. It's a horrible stretch. Horrible horrible horrible.

Except I am not Amrun. I don't tl;dr when I want to make a plan like that. I did miss it because I didn't care about what Amrun was posting and my mind was on what AP was doing, but I would never miss it if I wanted to create such a scheme.

In post 1044, Amrun wrote:He took too long to address it. That's not natural.

In post 1207, Amrun wrote:Zero percent of my reasons for you have had anything to do with the frequency and timing of your posts. ZERO PERCENT.

YOUR LYING SCUMBUTT IS NEXT, AMRUN.

NEXT.

I've explained that already. You posted immediately so why you think I meant you took too long to post is fucking beyond me. Please learn to read, ap. I know you are a smart boy. Try harder.

Actually lets quote the whole thing!

In post 1044, Amrun wrote:I just read it again. He took too long to address it. That's not natural.

VOTE: angryPidgeon

OH and then you VOTED me right after calling the timing of my posts UNNATURALLY SCUMMY.

And combined with the constant reminders from you that activity is not a tell, this is GOLDEN.

Shit the fuck up for five seconds and learn to READ. It had zero things to do with the TIMING of your posts. Zero!

I dont care I was still in a situation that made my activity spotty and got called scummy for it by no less than 3 people. So I have absolutely zero shame in defending myself from it by explaining MY ACTIVITY.

Im pissed that Elyse even remotely thinks I did something wrong.

I never called your activity, spotty or otherwise, scummy. It isn't.

I did, and still do, have issues with what you chose to post when you were posting.

In post 1200, Wisdom wrote:Anyway.
enomis/Safety/Amrun/Elyse.
With Grimgroove or NS if any of them is wrong.
We lynch NS and we have the jaguars and the monkeys fight.
Are there disagreements on this?

I want this answered by everyone that is not in those four.

But no, I don't think explaining what was happening in real life should be anything to feel shame for. (??)

P-edit: I'm fine with it anyway.

I like how elyse and wisdom has me and safety as conf scum.

@Mollie:
Wisdom's meta fit quite well with his scum meta. I did had him peck as scum. But he seem to really believe in the case of Angry being scum because of his fake reaction post. I find it hard for scum to do this.


No worries, i will challenge the green monkey on day 3.

In post 1222, enomis wrote:@Mollie:
Wisdom's meta fit quite well with his scum meta.

You have repeated this at least 4 times now, don't you have anything else to say?

In post 1222, enomis wrote:But he seem to really believe in the case of Angry being scum because of his fake reaction post. I find it hard for scum to do this.

I added an extra point.