Page 49 of 53
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:45 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Brian Skies' reads wrote:
ak - Leaning town.
NS - Null.
HC (Prohawk) - Null.
He already put one of his buddy in leaning scum pile.
I doubt that he put his scumbuddy in leaning town pile.
That leaves his null zone, ProHawk and ns.
After reading his iso, while he later butted heads with ProHawk (scumreading him), but he never interacted with ns. At all.
So.... bingo?
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:18 pm
by artemiskitty
In post 1197, ProHawk wrote:
General absence last game day and this game day is troubling to me topped off with trying to get me lynched on a false premise. NS isn't a terrible lynch and would be my second choice.
Pro hawk, I pretty much dropped my suspicion esp after the Brian lynch.
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 1:31 pm
by GuyInFreezer
You should hammer.
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 2:14 pm
by notscience
Hold the fucking phone.
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:10 pm
by Titus
Now who is reading the wrong game.
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:13 pm
by notscience
I want some time to work on my last reads, so my lynch isn't just a "nope not this one" lynch.
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:22 pm
by Rebel Without a Pulse
what happened to the whole "titus is scum" rampage?
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 3:29 pm
by notscience
What makes you think I still think she's scum?
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 6:50 pm
by Titus
How did you two both manage to forget you had that same discussion 100 posts ago?
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 7:12 pm
by Cabd
Vote Count of the Fourth City, Third Block
Players Alive: 8
Votes to Lynch: 5
Format of:
Wagon (size): Voters on wagon
Titus (1): beastcharizard
notscience (3): GuyInFreezer, Rebel Without a Pulse, Titus
ArtemisKitty (1): ProHawk
Deadline falls on the 20th of October. That is
(expired on 2013-10-20 23:59:00)
Mod Notes:
Yay for activity.
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:59 am
by Rail Tracer
why does it take the threat of lynch for you to give your current reads, ns? :/ not to mention no one even listens to a dead player's reads, lolol
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:02 am
by Rail Tracer
In post 1201, artemiskitty wrote: In post 1197, ProHawk wrote:
General absence last game day and this game day is troubling to me topped off with trying to get me lynched on a false premise. NS isn't a terrible lynch and would be my second choice.
Pro hawk, I pretty much dropped my suspicion esp after the Brian lynch.
are you guys still suspicious of NS or...?
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:07 am
by Rail Tracer
@Prohawk,
if you're ISOing nati+AK, everything from about post #663 onwards at the start of D2 is what i think looks unlikely as scum-scum interaction. the way AK talks to Nati about NS, and their other reads, didn't really look like scum talking to a buddy.
apart from the nati stuff, i'm also thinking the way in which they've been attacking players this game (particularly their confidence in some cases, and lack of confidence in others) doesn't really make me think scum pushing an agenda.
i haven't really looked at brian+AK interactions, but that's low on my priority list today.
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:14 am
by Rail Tracer
i'm totally fine with the NS wagon actually.
i'm pretty tired atm so i'm sort of skimming ISOs now, but i'm sort of PoEing ns as remaining scum here.
i'm busy for the next liiiiiiike 18 hours and then i'm gonna be tired as fuck but i'll try to get around to giving some ISOs a proper read after that, or when i'm taking breaks. whatever.
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:00 am
by artemiskitty
In post 1211, Rail Tracer wrote: In post 1201, artemiskitty wrote: In post 1197, ProHawk wrote:
General absence last game day and this game day is troubling to me topped off with trying to get me lynched on a false premise. NS isn't a terrible lynch and would be my second choice.
Pro hawk, I pretty much dropped my suspicion esp after the Brian lynch.
are you guys still suspicious of NS or...?
i haven't talked to mala about it again, but i definitely still am. i didn't want to vote yet and get him hammered too quickly yet though...
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:19 pm
by notscience
I'll get you guys my full reads tomorrow (@RT, these two flips have really shook things up for me)
And >.>
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:01 pm
by GuyInFreezer
At this point I have nothing more to say.
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:04 pm
by beastcharizard
ns, you are still at L-2. Just so you know. You seem to have not read anything.
I feel Titus is the better lynch here.
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:11 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Why?
Nati literally cleared titus.
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:49 pm
by beastcharizard
What? I must have completely missed that or gotten this confused with another game.
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:50 pm
by beastcharizard
Actually, can you explain how Natirasha cleared them?
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:51 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Well Nati was scum but still he claimed hider and cleared titus.
Based on the situation that time, I don't think he was covering his scumbuddy.
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:10 pm
by Titus
I am paranoid the scum team is buddying. Natirasha opened up with clear buddying. His claim to clear me is a null. He wanted it to mean something. Perhaps link us if he knew he was getting lynched? I don't know. From an objectiv standpoint, I am not clear.
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:17 pm
by artemiskitty
In post 1215, notscience wrote:I'll get you guys my full reads tomorrow (@RT, these two flips have really shook things up for me)
And >.>
that's the thing notscience
i imagine that you would just state what you want RIGHT now. not wait. if you were town
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 7:18 pm
by artemiskitty
i mean, if you were town - wouldn't you just shoot off what you were thinking?