Mafiascum.net

In post 1196, brassherald wrote:We can ban gold, silk or crab.

What does this mean?

In post 1198, Kokichi Oma wrote:I don't like the idea of barring people from WC hosts. As down the line we may have inno reports on people who were scummy.

The prevention of being WC host cannot be done multiple days.

In post 1200, Kokichi Oma wrote:

In post 1196, brassherald wrote:We can ban gold, silk or crab.

What does this mean?

We have a ban gold, ban silk, or ban crab option to put up. We get to vote on a temporary ban of these luxury resources.

I have no relevant information that will help with it, and I have a feeling that the people who do know about it will not step forward with it since these luxury resources may have to do with their wincon.

I have to give a list of three, I am thinking my three may be banning the luxury resources.

I am uncomfortable with any permanent ones, which are for conservation of natural wonders, world wonders, or the embargo of city states.

We can also temporarily increase the funding of the arts or sciences, but again, not sure what those do.

I kind of want to ban a luxury item if only to see if it has any effect tomorrow.

We also need to pick within 24 hours.

In post 1204, brassherald wrote:We also need to pick within 24 hours.

That's good imo, prevents a stall in that department

can you guys list out everything in one post? i see several and i want everything on the table

jailkeep brass

are you guys told what banning/making those resources do and whom it affects? cuz it might b good to empower ppl if thats available

In post 1206, marshy wrote:can you guys list out everything in one post? i see several and i want everything on the table

jailkeep brass

are you guys told what banning/making those resources do and whom it affects? cuz it might b good to empower ppl if thats available

WE are given vauge descriptions and we are assuming what they do.

In post 1202, brassherald wrote:

In post 1200, Kokichi Oma wrote:

In post 1196, brassherald wrote:We can ban gold, silk or crab.

What does this mean?

We have a ban gold, ban silk, or ban crab option to put up. We get to vote on a temporary ban of these luxury resources.

I have no relevant information that will help with it, and I have a feeling that the people who do know about it will not step forward with it since these luxury resources may have to do with their wincon.

Does anyone have any info on any of this? [Without outing anything important] I could see it being farmed to use an ability. But I have no clue either.

I'll make a summary of all of them in one post after I get home tonight.

I don't think any are as clear as the Peacekeeping one, and even that one is a bit of a leap of faith for us to think it's a straight Jailkeep.

I say ban gold. Only cause I can see that being something mafia needs?

I say go with the Jail keep on brass.

I'll wait for tonight then.

Kok- you said you were waiting on the WC to vote me, then when a creature wagon takes off you vote there. That's a conflict there. You say I'm cherry picking, I disagree there.

I'm not voting you because like I said I'm not sure to your motivation behind your posting. Gamma on the other hand I feel good about.

In post 1160, brassherald wrote:VOTE: Nero Cain

I want to give Creature a chance right now to catch up and post and show he is not scum.

Swaying on my Klazam read a bit.

Nero is the only one left, then if we are to assume one wagon is real scum, which seems reasonable.

Hes town

In post 278, Kokichi Oma wrote:VOTE: Creature

Let's get this. Not feeling the BuJab vote as much any more.

In post 315, Kokichi Oma wrote:Vote creature, he's scum. Also vote me as your leader.

In post 317, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yes, he plays lurking as scum. So vote him.

In post 373, Kokichi Oma wrote:UNVOTE:

In post 452, Kokichi Oma wrote:We should elect before we lynch.

In post 786, Kokichi Oma wrote:I could get on board with a klazam lynch.

In post 796, Kokichi Oma wrote:

In post 787, Klazam wrote:

In post 786, Kokichi Oma wrote:I could get on board with a klazam lynch.

What's stopping you? I'm curious

Waiting for WC to be finalized.

In post 958, Kokichi Oma wrote:Also I was going to tell people to get back on Creature, so I'm glad people are.

VOTE: Creature

In post 961, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yeah, we won't lynch until the WC is figured out completely.

Creature should be the lynch today for sure, when we do.

Klazam, I'm the one who started the original creature wagon. And I only got off to say we should figure out WC. I got back on to out pressure but told no one else to vote till we got WC done. So...What are you even trying to say?

Joey_ wrote:

In post 1160, brassherald wrote:VOTE: Nero Cain

I want to give Creature a chance right now to catch up and post and show he is not scum.

Swaying on my Klazam read a bit.

Nero is the only one left, then if we are to assume one wagon is real scum, which seems reasonable.

Hes town

I hear you, until we get a resolution up for votes, I'm just going to remove my lynch vote. We have plenty of time.

UNVOTE:

Creature is the lynch later. Then vig klazam.

So in that hypothetical, why didn't you vote me in the first place? You could've easily said the same thing you said after the creature vote, if you voted me, yeah? I mean, you held off on voting me and not him. That's what doesn't look right to me.

Also why am I the vig target? A lynch on me returns much more information than a lynch on creature would, yeah?

In post 1214, Klazam wrote:

mod- are we told what the resolution that they pick to vote on are? And apologies if I missed this somewhere else, but can the same resolution be proposed and passed twice or more in the game?

In post 1218, brassherald wrote:

Joey_ wrote:

In post 1160, brassherald wrote:VOTE: Nero Cain

I want to give Creature a chance right now to catch up and post and show he is not scum.

Swaying on my Klazam read a bit.

Nero is the only one left, then if we are to assume one wagon is real scum, which seems reasonable.

Hes town

I hear you, until we get a resolution up for votes, I'm just going to remove my lynch vote. We have plenty of time.

UNVOTE:

Thanks, also im kinda bummed that only two players get to see the resolutions, and i dont understand the concept of luxuries in this setup, is there more info in the pm?

In post 1222, Joey_ wrote:

In post 1218, brassherald wrote:

Joey_ wrote:

In post 1160, brassherald wrote:VOTE: Nero Cain

I want to give Creature a chance right now to catch up and post and show he is not scum.

Swaying on my Klazam read a bit.

Nero is the only one left, then if we are to assume one wagon is real scum, which seems reasonable.

Hes town

I hear you, until we get a resolution up for votes, I'm just going to remove my lynch vote. We have plenty of time.

UNVOTE:

Thanks, also im kinda bummed that only two players get to see the resolutions, and i dont understand the concept of luxuries in this setup, is there more info in the pm?

Very little, upon a reread, I did realize that Gold is somehow tied to religion, as well. It references religious gold being particularly bad.

In post 1220, Klazam wrote:So in that hypothetical, why didn't you vote me in the first place? You could've easily said the same thing you said after the creature vote, if you voted me, yeah? I mean, you held off on voting me and not him. That's what doesn't look right to me.

Also why am I the vig target? A lynch on me returns much more information than a lynch on creature would, yeah?

It's literally explained in the quotes.

And cause I'm sure on creature, you're most likely mafia though.