In post 1199, Kanna wrote:Also Ame, why did you hard TR DDL and turn on him, then hard TR Hectic and turn on him too?
I shouldn't have, but since we were excluding you I started thinking of alternate theories. It was a mistake to have done so.
Why is this not opportunism?
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:02 pm
by Ame
In post 1201, Kanna wrote:I don't think I get your point then. If you asked me a question and are going to scumread me no matter how I answer, then why did you ask it?
Also it was natural because I'm town. That's just how I react.
Haha I want you to explain why you didn't consider the answer I had already given. It's as simple as that, but you've been dancing around it all game.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:04 pm
by Kanna
In post 1200, Ame wrote:I don't think his dying messages were townie and neither did Luca or Slaxx. The fact that you did indicates that you are the deviant.
Well, I did because he didn't fight back, but instead left a message. I felt like that was townie.
In post 1199, Kanna wrote:Also Ame, why did you hard TR DDL and turn on him, then hard TR Hectic and turn on him too?
I shouldn't have, but since we were excluding you I started thinking of alternate theories. It was a mistake to have done so.
Why is this not opportunism?
Because it would have been silly for scum to have put themselves out there for no reason. The logical thing for scum Ame would have simply been to no lynch and kill you.
Additionally my reasoning is easily followable. There is nothing disingenuous about it and you can tell I was thinking things through as we went along.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:05 pm
by Kanna
I don't really know what you want me to explain?? I guess I didn't read it? I don't know? RQS is just something I have personal experience with so I was interested in it. That's all
In post 1200, Ame wrote:I don't think his dying messages were townie and neither did Luca or Slaxx. The fact that you did indicates that you are the deviant.
Well, I did because he didn't fight back, but instead left a message. I felt like that was townie.
It felt to me like an appeal to emotion and an attempt to make me back down.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:09 pm
by Ame
In post 1207, Kanna wrote:I don't really know what you want me to explain?? I guess I didn't read it? I don't know? RQS is just something I have personal experience with so I was interested in it. That's all
So to be clear, did you or did you not read it? Please state this directly. No more guessing. Just answer.
In post 1199, Kanna wrote:Also Ame, why did you hard TR DDL and turn on him, then hard TR Hectic and turn on him too?
I shouldn't have, but since we were excluding you I started thinking of alternate theories. It was a mistake to have done so.
Why is this not opportunism?
Because it would have been silly for scum to have put themselves out there for no reason. The logical thing for scum Ame would have simply been to no lynch and kill you.
Additionally my reasoning is easily followable. There is nothing disingenuous about it and you can tell I was thinking things through as we went along.
Actually I feel like we're entering the territory of everything being able to be argued for so ??? Why couldn't you have put yourself out there to make this argument/throw people off?
In post 1207, Kanna wrote:I don't really know what you want me to explain?? I guess I didn't read it? I don't know? RQS is just something I have personal experience with so I was interested in it. That's all
So to be clear, did you or did you not read it? Please state this directly. No more guessing. Just answer.
I literally can't remember whenever this happened. I must've skimmed over it then.
In post 1199, Kanna wrote:Also Ame, why did you hard TR DDL and turn on him, then hard TR Hectic and turn on him too?
I shouldn't have, but since we were excluding you I started thinking of alternate theories. It was a mistake to have done so.
Why is this not opportunism?
Because it would have been silly for scum to have put themselves out there for no reason. The logical thing for scum Ame would have simply been to no lynch and kill you.
Additionally my reasoning is easily followable. There is nothing disingenuous about it and you can tell I was thinking things through as we went along.
Actually I feel like we're entering the territory of everything being able to be argued for so ??? Why couldn't you have put yourself out there to make this argument/throw people off?
Because it's simply not optimal and would have severely decreased my chances of winning as scum. And again, my reasoning is genuine and can be followed. If there were holes in it, then yeah you could make the argument that I was pushing an agenda.
In post 1207, Kanna wrote:I don't really know what you want me to explain?? I guess I didn't read it? I don't know? RQS is just something I have personal experience with so I was interested in it. That's all
So to be clear, did you or did you not read it? Please state this directly. No more guessing. Just answer.
I literally can't remember whenever this happened. I must've skimmed over it then.
Missing it is a perfectly acceptable answer! Saying that forgot is not!
I specifically asked you before if you missed it:
In post 721, Ame wrote:@Kanna I'm more interested in why you asked me at that time when I had stated a bit before that I was going to reveal everything. e.g. did you not see my post? did you misinterpret it? other?
@Luca Ok. I was just curious (not game related).
And you also stated that you forgot then. You can't simply forget whether or not you saw something lol. You either did or you didn't. You being dicey about this is what has been pinging me for so long.
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2020 6:29 pm
by Ame
To be clear it would also be acceptable to have forgotten my post and that's why you asked. But what you're saying is that you've forgotten whether or not you actually saw it which is not believable in the slightest.
Hum, I'm having flashbacks of AaronFrost here. He also didn't vote one day before lylo.
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:23 am
by clidd
Hum
VOTE: Kanna
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:23 am
by clidd
UNVOTE: Kanna
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:23 am
by clidd
Testing my keyboard.
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:31 am
by Ame
I didn't want you to feel under pressure. I think in Boon's game, you became flustered when I made my push on Hectic and everything was going so fast, which made me think you're someone who needs time/space to work things out and don't do so well when things are going fast pace.
VOTE: Kanna
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:34 am
by clidd
In post 1222, Ame wrote:I didn't want you to feel under pressure. I think in Boon's game, you became flustered when I made my push on Hectic and everything was going so fast, which made me think you're someone who needs time/space to work things out and don't do so well when things are going fast pace.
VOTE: Kanna
Yes, you're right.
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:54 am
by Kanna
In post 1214, Ame wrote:To be clear it would also be acceptable to have forgotten my post and that's why you asked. But what you're saying is that you've forgotten whether or not you actually saw it which is not believable in the slightest.
Well it's just what happened. Sometimes I post what I'm thinking without thinking too much about what's happening around me. You're nitpicking on things which don't mean anything to try and make me look bad.
