Mafiascum.net

To justify avoiding a wagon that 1. could disolve after a claim, or 2. could go through and flip town because she knows gobble is not scum

In post 1196, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 1189, lilith2013 wrote:@ponk ball, what’s your read on maria?

In post 1190, lilith2013 wrote:oops, pink ball*

Wait no, no oops, I love ponk ball

She's town

okay i will call you ponk ball from now on

damn so close to the pagetop

In post 1199, lilith2013 wrote:

In post 1195, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 1187, lilith2013 wrote:

In post 30, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 16, Firebringer wrote:

In post 14, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 8, Firebringer wrote:VOTE: Datisi

btw i am a cop

Gobbles do u doubt my genuineness.

Iiii do

this is the one i saw on first glance?

I believe there are no cops in this setup?

“Iiii” -> i read as a tracker crumb

i did say i was really shitty at reading crumbs

Dude that's brilliant, if that's not a crumb it SHOULD'VE

In post 1200, Pink Ball wrote:To justify avoiding a wagon that 1. could disolve after a claim, or 2. could go through and flip town because she knows gobble is not scum

okay gobbles did say he crumbed though?

idk what skitter saw but i’m really not picking up what you’re putting down here

gobbles said he crumbed and that it wasn’t an sk crumb so at this point are you just arguing that skitter lied about seeing a crumb that actually existed? idgi

In post 1118, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 1116, MariaR wrote:That's legit L-1 time to claim gobble.

See if you can find my crumbs!
And no I’m not.

In post 1120, gobbledygook wrote:I am PR though. I thought I’ve been pretty clear with my crumbs.

In post 1123, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1120, gobbledygook wrote:I am PR though. I thought I’ve been pretty clear with my crumbs.

I saw it for the record
I'm not actually townreading him on play but i didnt want to push cuz of the crumb i saw, that's why i protested his wagon

In post 1129, skitter30 wrote:I dont think he's a vig and i should probably stop posting about this now

In post 1165, gobbledygook wrote: I am the serial killer.

I'm saying skitter said she saw the crumbs because it was convenient for her to say that, 'cause it's something you can wash off easily too ("Oh I guess what I saw wasn't a crumb then")

In post 1208, Pink Ball wrote:I'm saying skitter said she saw the crumbs because it was convenient for her to say that, 'cause it's something you can wash off easily too ("Oh I guess what I saw wasn't a crumb then")

^
Tldr: She used it as an excuse to stay off a town wagon to look better on the flip. (At least Scum would've considered it one)

Okay but presumably scum!skitter wouldn’t say that she saw a crumb if she didn’t actually see any posts that could have conceivably been a crumb, and she totally could have just said she didn’t see it and said she was questioning the wagon because she was townreading gobble or even just because it was so fast, which would have been consistent with what she was saying before. So I’m assuming that she’s telling the truth about seeing a crumb, regardless of her alignment.

that can be @both of you i guess

the only reason i could see for skitter lying about seeing a crumb is if gobbles isn’t SK and is just scum and skitter is also scum

I'm not sure I agree, but that seems like a very town thought process.

BRB, I wanna check something.

like either:
1) skitter is town and did see a crumb
2) skitter is scum and did see a crumb
3) skitter is scum and didn’t see a crumb but for some reason lied about seeing it when she could have just said she was townreading gobbles
4) skitter and gobbles are both scum and skitter is covering for gobbles?

In post 1213, Bingle wrote:I'm not sure I agree, but that seems like a very town thought process.

BRB, I wanna check something.

what post is this in response to?

i should really sleep

@ponk ball can you explain this interaction?

In post 926, gobbledygook wrote:I don’t like skitter randomly going after chemist. It reads to me like she’s trying to get away from the SS interaction she had by creating new talking points on an easy slot to go after

In post 927, Pink Ball wrote:Let's DO IT

VOTE: skitter30

what was your read on gobbles at the time? how come you immediately unvoted skitter?

@ponk ball this too

In post 934, Pink Ball wrote:C'mon, you're skitter, you should know it, one way or another you should know it.

Who's scum, skitter?

No but for real, I have some good vibes towards a solid townbloc and that's fine enough for now. Mixed feelings would be on you, Chemist and Bingle. Bingle is probably town at the end of the day, but he still has to die for all the betrayals I've suffered on his behalf

so you had what was maybe a scumlean on chemist but agreed with voting skitter because of her chemist vote? Why no push on chemist afterwards? Or further engagement with skitter?

Nope, was misremembering. I thought she did basically the same thing in C9 but it turns out that not only was that actually 8 months ago (How does time even work?) but she did functionally the opposite with scumreading ducky despite crumbs.

Skits, could you point to what and why you thought were crumbs worth backing off from?

In post 1215, lilith2013 wrote:

In post 1213, Bingle wrote:I'm not sure I agree, but that seems like a very town thought process.

BRB, I wanna check something.

what post is this in response to?

PB's.

In post 1214, lilith2013 wrote:like either:
1) skitter is town and did see a crumb
2) skitter is scum and did see a crumb
3) skitter is scum and didn’t see a crumb but for some reason lied about seeing it when she could have just said she was townreading gobbles
4) skitter and gobbles are both scum and skitter is covering for gobbles?

Hey if you write it like that you're just shading the thing you don't agree with

1)skitter is town, saw the crumb and for some reason she felt the need of telling everyone she saw the crumb when the conversation had nothing to do with that 'cause she didn't even defend gobble when she said she saw the crumb
2) skitter is scum and did see a crumb and put herself in the highlight to defend town, why?
3) skitter is scum and didn't see a crumb
4) skitter and gobbles are both scum and skitter is covering for gobbles in the worst play scum could possibly try to pull off

See?

okay fair, i added my personal interpretation. do you see where i’m coming from though?

In post 1217, lilith2013 wrote:@ponk ball can you explain this interaction?

In post 926, gobbledygook wrote:I don’t like skitter randomly going after chemist. It reads to me like she’s trying to get away from the SS interaction she had by creating new talking points on an easy slot to go after

In post 927, Pink Ball wrote:Let's DO IT

VOTE: skitter30

what was your read on gobbles at the time? how come you immediately unvoted skitter?

I think I told Mena that gobble was a null read. I wanted to vote skitter for a while ago. I unvoted her because it was funny.

In post 1218, lilith2013 wrote:@ponk ball this too

In post 934, Pink Ball wrote:C'mon, you're skitter, you should know it, one way or another you should know it.

Who's scum, skitter?

No but for real, I have some good vibes towards a solid townbloc and that's fine enough for now. Mixed feelings would be on you, Chemist and Bingle. Bingle is probably town at the end of the day, but he still has to die for all the betrayals I've suffered on his behalf

so you had what was maybe a scumlean on chemist but agreed with voting skitter because of her chemist vote? Why no push on chemist afterwards? Or further engagement with skitter?

I never said I agreed voting skitter for voting Chemist, I just voted skitter with no further explanation. Chemist is not a scumlean, mixed feelings is not a scumlean. Pushing Chemist, in my experience, is worthless.

In post 1222, lilith2013 wrote:okay fair, i added my personal interpretation. do you see where i’m coming from though?

Yeah yeah I totally get your skepticism and you're making me have second thoughts about it