Mafiascum.net

In post 1199, Nepenthes wrote:You didnt hard defend truth but you sure did enjoy talking abt why you wouldnt vote them

I did in fact vote him at one point but if what you mean is that I chose to go with looker instead of compromising then I offered my reasons for that. To be clear: I didn’t have anything against a truth exec other than the fact that a looker exec would’ve been much better in my mind

In post 1189, superbowl9 wrote:chkflip why are you voting gypyx? You said it was a placeholder but 1 what are you waiting for and 2 why him specifically as a placeholder?

I answered both of these questions already, so what's the point of this post exactly but to look productive?

In post 1178, Titus wrote:

In post 1177, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Why do you believe scum have been ineffective?

If Dunn is scum, he's deadweight to their team. There was a scum lynch day 2. It's a decent assumption if Dunn is scum.

It doesn't hold though unless one of Dunn/Looker is scum.

In post 1192, Titus wrote:

In post 1183, Gypyx wrote:And i don't find that scum has been ineffective? Like what tells you that? Truth was pretty much guaranteed to get lynched at some point

Truth's guaranteed lynch is why scum were ineffective.

So which one is it Titus?
VOTE: titus

In post 1201, chkflip wrote:

In post 1189, superbowl9 wrote:chkflip why are you voting gypyx? You said it was a placeholder but 1 what are you waiting for and 2 why him specifically as a placeholder?

I answered both of these questions already, so what's the point of this post exactly but to look productive?

My bad I think I missed both of those then? Genuinely curious about both of these

Wait Walt where's the contradiction? I'm lost.

Bowl I'm not in the business of repeating myself.

In post 1184, Looker wrote:Is superbowl voting me because I allow math to support my scumhunting

Not because you support your scumhunting with math, because you're supporting your "math" with "scumhunting".

In post 1204, chkflip wrote:Bowl I'm not in the business of repeating myself

Best I can see is 1106, which I can maybe divine you were waiting on Titus VCA and voting gypyx to pressure him to actually scumhunt instead of sheeping? I don't see anything else on this though, if you don't want to repeat can I get a post number at least?

It offers two reasons for why scum were not effective.

One is about dunn then talks about truth.

In post 1202, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:

In post 1178, Titus wrote:

In post 1177, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Why do you believe scum have been ineffective?

If Dunn is scum, he's deadweight to their team. There was a scum lynch day 2. It's a decent assumption if Dunn is scum.

It doesn't hold though unless one of Dunn/Looker is scum.

In post 1192, Titus wrote:

In post 1183, Gypyx wrote:And i don't find that scum has been ineffective? Like what tells you that? Truth was pretty much guaranteed to get lynched at some point

Truth's guaranteed lynch is why scum were ineffective.

So which one is it Titus?
VOTE: titus

I don't understand the question.

• .
  
• 'supporting your "math" with "scumhunting"' - I don't know what that means

VOTE: Superbowl

I don't care for voting Looker today and I think Osaka is town. My VCA suggests (but doesn't prove) Gypyx isn't scum.

Very tempting

What about superbowl, you think? Titus.

I will take a look in the morning when I am more awake.
Ignore my last q.

oh only 2 days until deadline, fuck

the fact that i still can't get any read on suka worries me, and i don't really think we have time for a superbowl wagon titus

VOTE: Oksua

Gypyx, why osuka? Simply because deadline + no read?

Bowl, I thought I'd made it more clear in the post right after the one you linked but apparently I didn't. That's on me. I'm heading to bed right now though and I think I need to reevaluate anyway.

Well i mean, kinda hard to have additional reasons when you just can't read a slot right?
But the fact that's he's also against looker (who i think is town) also adds on the reasons i wanna vote Suka, like i could see them being town on town, but it's an accumulation of details

What are your reads?

In post 1214, Gypyx wrote:oh only 2 days until deadline, fuck

the fact that i still can't get any read on suka worries me, and i don't really think we have time for a superbowl wagon titus

VOTE: Oksua

this is sad

In post 1210, Looker wrote:

• .
  
• 'supporting your "math" with "scumhunting"' - I don't know what that means

Spoiler:

Looker (2)

osuka, superbowl9,

osuka (2)

Looker, Nepenthes,

Gypyx (2)

Titus, chkflip,

Titus (1)

WaltertheDunce10,

Not Voting (2) Dunnstral, Gypyx
With 9 alive it is 5 to execute, and 5 to No Execute.

Kind of waiting for Dunnstral and Gypyx to figure out what they want to do.

stop dodging and answer my question

I think osuka seems to have support and we are running out of time, so
VOTE: Osuka

I don't think Osaka is scum by VCA. I feel looker has a better chance of flipping scum.

VOTE: Looker

I would be fine by either one at this point

I am fine with neither. I just feel Osaka provides more value thsn Looker and a Looker flip refines the VCA.