Mafiascum.net

In post 1199, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1197, Porkens wrote:I don’t want to flip either jackel or starbuck atm.

I don't wanna flip Catboi, why are you even voting them?

From what I can tell, reactionary from one specific post

i also haPpen have 4 tiers
catboi and norwEe share the same tier for me
there may or may Not be addItional playerS in that tier
it is not tier 1

I see no good reason why catboi made that ultimatum.

Did you just crumb what i think you did?

In post 1203, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Did you just crumb what i think you did?

Saintass

You know, we might actually just be better of killing scummy inactives, because if they're not gonna play then mafia will just kill active town and we'll end up with a super unmotivated game in the end and scum thrives in that kinda environment.

In post 1202, Porkens wrote:I see no good reason why catboi made that ultimatum.

There are an extremely limited number of people who could claim to have made the extra kill, and I'm not sure a vig fits in the picture with the roles we already know of. I'm concerned the extra kill was not from a town player.

In post 1205, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You know, we might actually just be better of killing scummy inactives, because if they're not gonna play then mafia will just kill active town and we'll end up with a super unmotivated game in the end and scum thrives in that kinda environment.

The question I have is how long do we allow Starbuck to come back and play the game before defaulting to them basically rolling over

In post 1206, catboi wrote:

In post 1202, Porkens wrote:I see no good reason why catboi made that ultimatum.

There are an extremely limited number of people who could claim to have made the extra kill, and I'm not sure a vig fits in the picture with the roles we already know of. I'm concerned the extra kill was not from a town player.

This logic checks out

And forcing that hypothetical town player to claim today accomplishes what?

In post 1209, Porkens wrote:And forcing that hypothetical town player to claim today accomplishes what?

Helps us solve the game tbh

If they have a second shot, I wouldn't claim. But if they already used it, they definitely should have claimed a long time ago. Btw, shared insights on site meta regarding vig shots (1x, 2x, etc) would be appreciated

I agree with the logic that waiting to claim later is more scummy than townie

I am definitely of the opinion that a vig does not exist, given that the shot makes absolutely no sense from a town player. There were way better options to shoot today that could have helped us towards solving this game

In post 1117, Porkens wrote:

In post 1115, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Maybe later.

This kind of stuff just comes across to me like scum who thinks he can’t be caught.

I have no interest in flipping starbuck today.

I am not fully opposed to a mass claim.

Staring to get low grade pings from a couple others

Rat didn’t want his corruption to be lowered, bell. Any insight on that?

Porky, I would like to get some more insight on this. Who (other than catboi) has been pinging you today?

Bee's ISO for day 2 is not good

Bee/Starbuck/Porky

Throw a dart in there, I feel like we have a pretty high chance of hitting scum

In post 1213, BananaCucho wrote:Bee/Starbuck/Porky

Throw a dart in there

Well Banana cake.
Do it.

what I don't understand is why people think with 4 days left that we're definitely carrying these votes to the end of D2.

banana you're at odds with catboi on when a seeming to be increasingly unlikely vig should claim. If there is one they're liable to follow the bigger common tr's advice.

Oh
Huh
Or are we

In post 1215, redtea wrote:what I don't understand is why people think with 4 days left that we're definitely carrying these votes to the end of D2.

What makes you think that? I highly doubt a lynch on anyone else is going to happen.

Or wait, maybe i misunderstood what you were trying to say there. You're pretty confusing sometimes.

What's y'all's reasoning for not including Jackel in the elimination pool anymore?

Sorry, I try. Helps when I use quotes but sometimes I get a little over-confident with my coherence. Or I'm on mobile, as I am now.

In post 1214, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1213, BananaCucho wrote:Bee/Starbuck/Porky

Throw a dart in there

Well Banana cake.
Do it.

In post 1219, redtea wrote:What's y'all's reasoning for not including Jackel in the elimination pool anymore?

I've still got them in my elimination pool. But wouldn't mind hearing what other people have to say regarding them.

In post 1219, redtea wrote:What's y'all's reasoning for not including Jackel in the elimination pool anymore?

Sorry, I try. Helps when I use quotes but sometimes I get a little over-confident with my coherence. Or I'm on mobile, as I am now.

This is my personal pool, I expect everyone to have differing opinions on it

IMO alligator is a player who probably found themselves in a bad spot early and has been trying to turn it around. Day 2 I'm raising the bar and she's meeting the expectation for me. She seems to be putting forth an effort to solve the game. Day 3 we'll raise the bar more.

So if they breathe they will be qualified to rise above the bar?

In post 1223, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So if they breathe they will be qualified to rise above the bar?

That's definitely not fair for alligator at all