Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:56 pm
Oh you meant that as null, never mind then.
I don't really remember anything to townread him for, so i was curious why you kept him to high up the list there.In post 1199, Lost wrote:are you asking me this because you think he's scum, or because you're curious
him talking to murder about murder's pp vote felt town, but that's about all i rly rmb of himIn post 1202, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't really remember anything to townread him for, so i was curious why you kept him to high up the list there.In post 1199, Lost wrote:are you asking me this because you think he's scum, or because you're curious
will you answer after he does? if you do, can you also explain why you posture your reads based on norwee's so muchIn post 1205, Isis wrote:I'm wavering on my Taylor townread a bit. Since I know norwee posted his townread earnestly and definitely wasn't trolling me I will let him answer
Lol like I would ever strategise or co-operate with my partnersIn post 1147, MURDERCAT wrote:I'm not sure I have a specific example, I could look. But my intuition was to just have NM and GG distance after the lolhammer and try to paint GG as noobtown as that's what I would do as scumIn post 1144, Lost wrote:you mentioned something about nm coaching gg but didn't quote/link it. can you share more on that
Good postIn post 1161, Tayl0r Swift wrote:yeah but what people look for is not whether opinions changed. its whether they can see what the person saw that changed your mind. and i see you saying "x is town" or "x is more likely scum" but i havent seen reasoning why. i cant really follow your progression. like you say "this post is kinda scummy" but then youll say the poster is town. i dont see a logical thought progression.
I was asking GG from a list like that, those are not my readsIn post 1163, Tayl0r Swift wrote:interesting that gg is absent from this list. why is it that the person you're voting and is currently discussed didnt make it into the scumpile... hmmm
In post 1166, Tayl0r Swift wrote:unrelated, could someone remind me who my scumreads are please?
Totally, mwnn could come back and react to it all, or maybe he just gives something non-committal, we have to wait and see.In post 1168, Lost wrote:mwnn has been on v/la, i think that plays a part in his activity and involvement, no?
Not convinced about TaylorIn post 1172, NorwegianboyEE wrote:As of right now, Geniusgamer/Penguin/Taylor
In no particular order of preference.
Great pointIn post 1174, Lost wrote:do you see gg bussing tayl0r even though he doesn't have to?
In post 1182, Isis wrote:I think Swift is towny
1178 could be that super fancy cognitive load tell I've heard about since it's illogical shade when Taylor's earlier post was a joke. I have yet to try messing with that dark magic (the way it's been explained to me is scum are more likely to misinterpret a joke because they've got more stuff on their mind due to being scum)
FireIn post 1190, Tayl0r Swift wrote:spicy take. scummy player says the most widely scumread player is probably scum but has to go find reasons because he doesnt have any.In post 1183, Lost wrote:ooof that's toughIn post 1181, Tayl0r Swift wrote:who is the scummiest person and why?
i'd say gg. give me a while to pull some concrete stuff together
im kinda twisting words here, but... is that the best you can do?
who is the second scummiest player to you and why then? i dont really care how you read gg. everyone is skeptical of gg, so theres not a whole lot to be learned about your unique thoughts there.
Good postIn post 1201, Lost wrote:tl;dr:
reads are poorly supported, lazy. typical scum emulating scumhunting kind of reads. never really bothers to look beyond textbook tells, which imo are important with this playerlist.
rigid playstyle makes me think scum sticking to his format, as opposed to if he were town and being able to adapt and not worry about getting caught.