Mafiascum.net

No idea how my previous post got posted twice - apologies

In post 1195, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1179, Tayl0r Swift wrote:we can do better than gerain, especially since gerain should be come more sortable on later days.

How would you ever know they'll be more sortable than anyone else.

cross-posted with this -> having looked at a couple of their games, it seems like they were somewhat more engaged on later days, but I agree that it would be good to have a plan in mind for what we are going to do about geraint/N_M as a town, especially if they do not kick into gear later on

In post 1184, geraintm wrote:

In post 1179, Tayl0r Swift wrote:we can do better than gerain, especially since gerain should be come more sortable on later days.

I'll just chip in that id rather not die today. But I don't mind being run up for a while until people decide to vote someone else off.
Putting pressure on me isn't going to alter my posts today for what it is worth. You aren't going to generate a reaction from me.
But if you want to see how others react, be my guest.

You could not have been possibly a single bit more conspicuous, I hope I am wrong though.

In post 1185, Marky Mark wrote:DGB has made it clear she doesn't believe in meta, so I find her TRing N_M on the basis of being soulmasons (ie relationship outside of the immediate game) a bit off.

I'd have to agree on this but didn't know how to word it properly, it's like saying they hate meta but then use meta.

In post 1185, Marky Mark wrote:... but she herself voted Geraint a couple of pages earlier, which is a wagon based on very similar principles (ie pressuring an inactive & hard to read player)

That whole "on lookout for lhf" thing is just plain contradicting everything, as I remember calling out in my wall on them.

In post 1186, Marky Mark wrote:-1094 where FL claims to be a 2-Shot doc -> I'm presuming you aren't actually claiming here but that it's some sort of in-joke?

I think it was mocking me for when I said that I fake-claim as town on my home-site

In post 1203, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1185, Marky Mark wrote:... but she herself voted Geraint a couple of pages earlier, which is a wagon based on very similar principles (ie pressuring an inactive & hard to read player)

That whole "on lookout for lhf" thing is just plain contradicting everything, as I remember calling out in my wall on them.

As a side note, I'm presuming LHF is "Low, Hard, Fast" ?

In post 1186, Marky Mark wrote:-I feel like FL is reading way too much into the fake informed claim, but NAI

This is cheap for me to say but they are, but they also said that they've been put in a bunch of traitor games or something so that's set in their mind aorn. I'm not sure of the validity of that but that's what they said iirc.

In post 1205, Marky Mark wrote:

In post 1203, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1185, Marky Mark wrote:... but she herself voted Geraint a couple of pages earlier, which is a wagon based on very similar principles (ie pressuring an inactive & hard to read player)

That whole "on lookout for lhf" thing is just plain contradicting everything, as I remember calling out in my wall on them.

As a side note, I'm presuming LHF is "Low, Hard, Fast" ?

Yeah exactly, definitely not what most people call "Low hanging fruit", those people are trying to give misinformation!!!

In post 1196, Marky Mark wrote:Scummy:
DK

( :O I'm not alone!)

In post 1200, Marky Mark wrote:No idea how my previous post got posted twice - apologies

It happens a lot more than I would like it to, mostly when I'm on mobile I think.

In post 1200, Marky Mark wrote:cross-posted with this -> having looked at a couple of their games, it seems like they were somewhat more engaged on later days, but I agree that it would be good to have a plan in mind for what we are going to do about geraint/N_M as a town, especially if they do not kick into gear later on

Yeah okay, yeeting them later down the line after they've been useless would probably be better than wasting them D1 before they open up if that's how they usually play.

I found a much easier way to respond to larger posts thanks to shellyc lmfaoooo

In post 1201, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1184, geraintm wrote:

In post 1179, Tayl0r Swift wrote:we can do better than gerain, especially since gerain should be come more sortable on later days.

I'll just chip in that id rather not die today. But I don't mind being run up for a while until people decide to vote someone else off.
Putting pressure on me isn't going to alter my posts today for what it is worth. You aren't going to generate a reaction from me.
But if you want to see how others react, be my guest.

You could not have been possibly a single bit more conspicuous, I hope I am wrong though.

Why do you hope you are wrong? Have the courage of your convictions

NB - I personally don't think it is massively scummy as they seem to play like this as both alignments from the two other games I looked at

In post 1208, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1196, Marky Mark wrote:Scummy:
DK

( :O I'm not alone!)

I'm not massively convinced by a DK wagon at this point in time (ie mid-day). It would be a wasted opportunity to pressure the lurkier players and get something out of them we can use to stop them coasting and also make a more accurate read. I've outlined why I find them (DK) scummy, but I feel like they'll post plenty of stuff to help refine that read regardless of any vote pressure.

In post 1203, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1185, Marky Mark wrote:... but she herself voted Geraint a couple of pages earlier, which is a wagon based on very similar principles (ie pressuring an inactive & hard to read player)

That whole "on lookout for lhf" thing is just plain contradicting everything, as I remember calling out in my wall on them.

i am calling to elim taylor not gerain rn but go off

In post 1192, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1144, DkKoba wrote:ok so i had this solve wrt your slot and math slot.

math!scum implied you!town.

im pretty sure u are scum otherwise.

flavor coming in and towntelling is leaning me on u being scum.

your engagement once flavor came in also at the same time felt fake and "participatory" i.e. u were just trying to look like u were there.

That's a super fluffy way to say you read them and math as a TvS

Or maybe i was trying to skip the "why" that would obviously come if i did say that

hey mark whats the difference between your infinity tr and my scumread? Just asking for a friend

In post 1216, DkKoba wrote:hey mark whats the difference between your infinity tr and my scumread? Just asking for a friend

I'm sorting them as more town than scum as they haven't done anything that stuck out to me as scummy, but they have been engaged in the game, facilitated discussion and made an effort to unpick stuff.

As far as I can tell based on 1144 (please correct me if I am mistaken) a major part of your scumread on them is their involvement with the wagon on math.

For ref, 672 is where the flashwagon on math starts. Shelly started it, infinity jumped onto it and then after a response by math, VP and you then also subsequently also jumped onto it. What was it in particular about Infinity being involved with the wagon that you found scummy as opposed to any of the other participants?

In post 1214, DkKoba wrote:

In post 1203, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1185, Marky Mark wrote:... but she herself voted Geraint a couple of pages earlier, which is a wagon based on very similar principles (ie pressuring an inactive & hard to read player)

That whole "on lookout for lhf" thing is just plain contradicting everything, as I remember calling out in my wall on them.

i am calling to elim taylor not gerain rn but go off

You were voting geraint at the time of making post 909 where you call the vote on N_M out as LHF

ok so?

Infinity isnt only scummy for their activity around the math wagon idk why ppl keep trying to make me out as a 2 dimensional player its getting rly annoying game after game

there's 3 scum minimum and I'm trying to slot 3 players into that and if im missing pieces then yes i am going to explore my null pile in which gerain is.

no one wands to help on pressurd anyways so VOTE: taylor

In post 1219, DkKoba wrote:ok so?

So you calling out Gamma voting N_M (ie a non-active hard-to-read player) as being LHF seems inconsistent when you yourself were voting for another non-active, hard-to-read player at the time you made the post

I don't have a problem with either Gamma's N_M vote or your Geraint vote, but I hope you can see why they are quite similar and why its weird you would call another player out for doing something similar to what you were doing yourself at the time

DkKoba wrote:Infinity isnt only scummy for their activity around the math wagon idk why ppl keep trying to make me out as a 2 dimensional player its getting rly annoying game after game

I apologise - I had a look back through your ISO to try and find other things you were SRing him for and couldn't see much. Care to enlighten me?