Mafiascum.net

In post 1099, Isis wrote:

In post 1006, skitter30 wrote:more than that she just wants to say things and then not engage with me on it

skitter where have I done this
you're not characterizing me accurately and it seems discredity and you're at best playing town more survivalistically than you should be playing the alignment because you're being really dismissive

In post 1100, Infinity 324 wrote:Ok, I did want to talk about this cause I’m still not sure on MT. Yes town re-evaluates based on new information, but there didn’t really seem to be any new information that MT was taking into account. Yes town can go back and ISO someone, but it didn’t seem particularly motivated to me. Scum opportunism seemed like a likely reason to re-evaluate there. Yeah personality could be another reason, but my gut is still kinda bothered by it.

In post 1101, Isis wrote:I don't always play patty cake with people I scumread, but "A readslist with more than X nullreads is always scum setting up audibles and never a townie who doesn't have people's alignments in her role PM" is such a dumb thing like no I don't exactly want to use it as a jumping off point.

If you want to talk about something you can talk about why you think voting two different people in one post is scummy. That's like, decent. What makes you read that as feigned indecision versus indecision, is there some marker to it making you sure you're not confbiasing?

In post 1201, Isis wrote:Dismissive is inherently survivalistic, it's a really safe way to interact.
If you roll scum, you want to reduce your "surface area" as much as possible.
That's how I think about stuffs

In post 1105, Infinity 324 wrote:The way she says it makes me really want to believe her.

In post 1202, skitter30 wrote:you realize this is basically what i'm saying wrt isis, right?

In post 1204, Infinity 324 wrote:I feel like there is a significant element of playstyle difference here no matter both of your alignments and it’s kind of difficult to parse out.

In post 1197, Infinity 324 wrote:Isis points out that mafia can be worried about losing to jesters too. Right. But jessie says she wasn’t worried about them ending the game. Jessie, what was worrying about the jester thing if it wouldn’t end the game?

In post 1174, team rocket queen wrote:i just wanted someone to unvote in the time being because i was worried about gypyx/thegoldenparadox hammering thegoldenparadox, i hadn't thought the idea through yet,

In post 693, Isis wrote:Flea had a long post that didn't accomplish much, but then they told on themselves for not accomplishing much. I think they're good. The wallpost reads like they actually just read the thread and shared every thought they had and didn't hide any from us and then they got to the end and realized they hadn't said anything, but they felt sorry not sorry cause town can do no wrong, and stated such with the right tone. You can get a lot of really really scumreads and townreads off of correctly discerning people's attitudes towards their own content (that's what elitelling is and some people say it's the most unfairly powerful tell so)

The discussion around the infinity comment made me realize shading a townblock for size without picking anyone can like, benefit scum without putting oneself in harm's way and that make sense. I wonder if that's getting to become too much of the game at this point.

I think it was skitter asked: if you want to go purely on past games, I should be able to read Pooky (the reason Pooky is treating it as poignant is that it's been a read against town consensus in the past) (is that what poignant means it means kind of the same thing as salient right?)

Skitter and Gloria both don't like my Ydrasse analysis, but Gloria's reaction was "I don't really feel this but I don't have any reason to believe this was manufactured and anyway I think the slot it's about

is

town so I'm happy about it"; skitter's reaction was, she doesn't even think Ydrasses is scum, but she cares a lot whether my point was stupid anyway.
VOTE: skitter

I will dayvig Pooky the next time he says this game's plot is not about a wedding between me and Morning Tweet (who so far seems like a town bride but if it turns out she's scum there will still be a wedding it will just be even more forbidden)

This post is a weird mix of remembering things not necessarily in order and reading some pages out of order on accident so sorry if it's chronologically messy.

In post 1121, Hopkirk wrote:I didn't like any of Skitter30's posting on this page and am especially curious on this. I don't get pushing this association.

In post 1123, Hopkirk wrote:This, but the biggest part is I interpreted 'talk' from Skitter30 as 'talk in real time'

In post 1131, Hopkirk wrote:(Dunn/Skitter30/Gypyx/Jessie) is the people I don't have good vibes on.
It's also to some extent concerning overlapping with people not approaching the game in a certain way.

In post 1148, team rocket queen wrote:

In post 1147, Flea The Magician wrote:A Jester role? o.O

I genuinely don't think it's likely, is there any more thought behind this or just suspicion?

Two Jesters... I mean from what I've heard of hectic games I'd probably expect everyone to be in that position if that's the case lol

it explains both of their behaviours for the whole game i think

and also like double elimination day and they are playing this way

In post 1153, Gloria Cleary wrote:

In post 1134, team rocket queen wrote:pooky please unvote just believe in me for a second

I think Jessie is town. This isn’t something scum usually say.

In post 1150, Flea The Magician wrote:Surely the best way to win as that would be to be scummy, not AFK as gypyx is? [Hope you're well friendo <3]
TGP has shown willingness to dedicate time to the game with a few of the posts and is just being shonky. There's way better ways to pull a jester win - and easier ways.

VOTE: TGP - I'm still happy with this regardless, if he is a jester, then jeeze. If they're both Jesters then that's an amazing wincon

Given the royal theme I wouldn't be surprised if there's a 3rd party of some description, Jester seems a bit naff of a mechanic to throw in.

In post 1150, Flea The Magician wrote:Given the royal theme I wouldn't be surprised if there's a 3rd party of some description

In post 1215, Dunnstral wrote:I think Jester paranoia in general is something more likely to come from scum than town

In post 1217, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 1215, Dunnstral wrote:I think Jester paranoia in general is something more likely to come from scum than town

this feels kinda scummy

In post 738, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 732, TheGoldenParadox wrote:but ONLY setup speccing on d1 with literally no information on a game that is known to be complex and have twists and turns without a single read on a player in the game is terrible.

this reads very wolfy

VOTE: TGP

In post 1217, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 1215, Dunnstral wrote:I think Jester paranoia in general is something more likely to come from scum than town

this feels kinda scummy

In post 1211, Isis wrote:If it's this post, I discuss roughly four players, and I waffle on one of them (infinity, being noncommital about how much the townblock thing should matter)

If you're referring to the post where Hopkirk specifically asked me about players I hadn't commented on specifically because they're the ones I'm not sure about then "randomly out of nowhere" is beyond bogus for describing why they weren't certain reads.

In post 1217, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 1215, Dunnstral wrote:I think Jester paranoia in general is something more likely to come from scum than town

this feels kinda scummy

In post 1195, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1055, Gloria Cleary wrote:No, I actually think I maybe am. This is what I expect town to do here. I seriously can’t even wrap my brain around this.

oh nm
you're my first guess, i'm like 95% positive