Mafiascum.net

In post 1149, Kop wrote:

In post 1065, HockeyFan wrote:Regarding 1052

Worst Scumcase ever :^)

In post 378, Kop wrote:

In post 374, superbowl9 wrote:You really think Hockey faked not knowing about no daytalk for townpoints? And no daytalk so it can't be a buddy the play him

I'm only saying that it could be easy to do that. I'm not saying that he did it here, but I've seen it before.

Scum impressions so far, is within Gamma, Grandpa, Titus, T3.

First scum log. Just having generally consesnus sr's is scum+ imo. Also, in this post its a bunch of fence sitting, and not comitting to a read on certain posts. For example, in this post he thinks I didnt fake townslipped but also it could very well be a fake townslip which is super ??, not really taking a stance.

I was simply saying that you could have fake townslipped because I have seen it before in other games, but I'm not taking a stance simply because I'm not going to hold a read based on that. You might have genuinely meant what you said, and not faked it.

In post 1065, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 896, Kop wrote:

In post 698, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

I think it buys a day, if he's alive tomorrow he hardclaims and we go from there

I can sense the reasoning behind this, but I don't like it. It feels like something that scum would be actively thinking, and are setting up the next day.

Again more fence sitting, says he can see the reasoning behind it, but still likes it ?? Says he can sense the reasoning just to say it would be smth scum would be thinking so why do u sense the reasoning behind it? negl, Kop/Superbowl interactions are super weird

Where did I say that I like it?

I can see his reasoning where it comes to day 2 and Roden is still alive he will need to hard claim. Town are going to wonder why a PR is still alive in day 2 because PR's are generally a threat to scum. Scum can easily see this, and will likely be setting up day 2 by creating WIFOM and allowing Roden to live.

In post 1065, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 373, Kop wrote:

In post 369, superbowl9 wrote:^towntell for not knowing that tho

I can see your point on it being a town tell, but could easily be scum faking that they didn't know.

AGAIN, MORE OF THE "I CAN SEE YOUR POINT" BUT IT COULD EASILLY BE "SCUM ....", like you're not willing to take hard stances on certain things which I think comes from scum+

Because like I said above. I'm not going to hold a read based on that. I was simply stating that you could have said what you did, for others to possibly believe it's a town tell and you would get a town read on it. I was taking the stance that I wasn't buying it, but I'm not going to town read you or scum read you based on your comment of day chat.

Kop who do u think is scum and why. Also, WHAT are you basing your reads off of then?

UNVOTE: T3

VOTE: Salsabil Faria

SF's play has devolved to spamming 1 liners, so i cbf to read her posts, but i think the extreme amount of pressure shes getting rn makes ehr town

sf, it makes it hard to tr u when you put yourself to e-1 with 7 days left. And no, idgaf about t3's alligment concerning you. This isnt among us. you cant say "WHEN I DIE, GET HIM" like ???. Can you scumcase t3 more for me

salsabil pls this happened last time and we nearly lost

please unvote yourself

STD, quick question, where has the wind taken u in terms of reads as of rn

QUICKHAMMER TIME

In post 1206, HockeyFan wrote:STD, quick question, where has the wind taken u in terms of reads as of rn

{GrandpaMo, Kop, Galron}

everyone else i'm somewhat townreading

In post 1199, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1144, marcistar wrote:

In post 1123, GrandpaMo wrote:holy shit just realized i havent pay attentioned shit to this game on low activity players. going to iso some ppl later

how soon is "later"

In post 1138, HockeyFan wrote:Wagon on Galron is concerning but galron is not part of my town core so idm it. also why tf are wagons moving so fast lol. it went from gpa -> SF -> Galron. Are mafia leading these wagons or smth

yes.
who do u think would be a better vote then bestie

MARCI, PLEASE START READING MY POSTS

fun fact: i have a really bad memory (:

In post 1197, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1189, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 1148, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 984, superbowl9 wrote:Got an early solve salsa?

T3

,

Titus

.... Not sure about the 3rd scum yet.

We need another T in the playerlist for you

Nope, the 3rd one is

GE

... They also know my

anti town

town game and miseliminated me as scum in a previous game + they're going for this route also: after my (town) flip, they'll say this

I don't like anti town play, thus voted her, not my fault, blah blah blah...

I'm already saying those things m8
aside from this, I'm probably not gonna interact with SF at all for the rest of the game, and I'm going to try to avoid her in future games, because I just don't care for this blatant refusal to have a functional playstyle.

gamma emerald why do u think galrons town

In post 1161, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1008, T3 wrote:I'll vote whatever the top wagon is as long as I'm not townreading them.

Scum post (but no one gonna listen to me, so whatever!)

No, thats a post scum like to scumread town for.

In post 1167, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1068, T3 wrote:

In post 1056, GrandpaMo wrote:that makes 0 sense

Day 1 lims are disproportionately on town.

So I can be town??

Statistically, if the lim ends up on you, then yes.

In post 1177, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1165, marcistar wrote:

In post 1161, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1008, T3 wrote:I'll vote whatever the top wagon is as long as I'm not townreading them.

Scum post (but no one gonna listen to me, so whatever!)

do you feel like you can case him?

My case on them mainly based on meta thing between us. I usually paly anti town as town, sometimes play conf town as town.

T3

played with my

anti town

self in the good amount of games, that's why I'm telling them scum here. Also, one thing I noticed in the previous games with them: they try hard as scum more than as town, that's how I caught scum!them in one game which I find here also. May be that's the reason for tunneling me, most of the players are townreading them except me and

sb9

I guess, so eliminating me will be beneficial for scum!them. As my play style is scummy in general, they can defend themselves in the next day by saying that.

I don't remember much of your meta. Me having high postcount is NAI.

In post 1185, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1181, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1164, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1034, T3 wrote:Salsa has done some SCUMMY STUFF

Which I all time do BECAUSE MY PLAY STYLE IS ANTI TOWN

and you're not trying to fix it

why

?

Cause I don’t want to?

wtf

Don't you know playing against wincon is the new vogue

In post 1201, Salsabil Faria wrote:

Let's make the game hard for all of you...

UNVOTE: T3

VOTE: Salsabil Faria

It's E-1 if I count right, if not then you know what to do

Bruh. You acting like this makes it hard for town to actually solve. Your selfish and arrogant act of continuing to act anti town says something. I was going to read you as town. But I just want to get you out regardless of town -- you don't help with town's wincon nor utilize the function of the village. You should stop, and really reflect what you are doing that is hurting town. Just because you don't like the situation you are in, doesn't mean you have to project it to the rest of town. If you are scum, then cool you are acting like level 1 basic scum. If you are town, you have continued to say you are purposefully having an anti - town playstyle. You started on MS recently, so I understand why you think it's hard not to change your playstyle, but if you continue like this, people will start to discredit you and never ever enjoy games with you. I know that you may not care, but I care because I am town and if you are town, you are making our chances of winning lower and lower. So stop, step back and look at the bigger picture. Organize your thoughts and come to a conclusion on why someone could be scum, there reasons for scum then go. I actually do like your scumread on t3 about meta, but I want to hear more. Give town, if you are town, your thoughts on why you are town and who we should limming?

In post 1127, T3 wrote:

In post 1103, Roden wrote:VOTE: superbowl9

Kill all open wolves.

I am

very

tempted to vote sb9.... if not for metagood.

Actually according to your meta analysis sb9 is currently playing to his scum meta. Reread your analysis then dive into his ISO. Plus, he's open wolfing. I've accused him of this multiple times now and he's never denied it, only ignored it.

In post 355, T3 wrote:Town sb9:
Very assertive
Switches between slight joking and hyperseriousness
Engages with the thread
Early game, will give unexplained reads but as the game progresses his reads will develop more
Scum sb9:
Less assertive
Fluffs and jokes around a lot, usually never hyperserious
Engages much less with the thread and usually doesn't respond to people's posts
Reads are mostly unexplained

In post 1219, Roden wrote:

In post 1127, T3 wrote:

In post 1103, Roden wrote:VOTE: superbowl9

Kill all open wolves.

I am

very

tempted to vote sb9.... if not for metagood.

Actually according to your meta analysis sb9 is currently playing to his scum meta. Reread your analysis then dive into his ISO. Plus, he's open wolfing. I've accused him of this multiple times now and he's never denied it, only ignored it.

In post 355, T3 wrote:Town sb9:
Very assertive
Switches between slight joking and hyperseriousness
Engages with the thread
Early game, will give unexplained reads but as the game progresses his reads will develop more
Scum sb9:
Less assertive
Fluffs and jokes around a lot, usually never hyperserious
Engages much less with the thread and usually doesn't respond to people's posts
Reads are mostly unexplained

LOL I was just gonna bring up what t3 said about the meta on sb9. I disagreed, I thought sb9 WAS playing to his town meta, they are switching back from the serious to the joke thing and I saw that multiple times in the thread. yk what #bant3

In post 885, Roden wrote:ISO dived sb9 and uh, wow it's actually a lot worse than I thought it was. I liked his posts when they were happening in the moment, but the entirety of his content is either jokes, a

lot

of complaining, nothing one liners, and role fishing. Any time reads come up it's only to shut down somebody else's town reads and scum reads. His own reads barely even exist, with most of his opinions on others either being vague or hedging. His only real read is a scum read on T3 but he also implies T3 is just a wrong townie. He doesn't even seem to scum read me, he just wants me to claim because he said so.

Quoting to reiterate.

I'm actually just gonna tunnel this because I refuse to see a single post in the post game bragging that the scum team won even after they claimed scum and did nothing all game.

Fuck. Salsa. Fuck.

Are you serious? I am starting to get paranoid -- I tried to ISO SF, because there were stuff I townread him, then the more I think about it the more he looks like the partner I hard defended day 1 in Open 810 as scum. They had a bad read list, played AtE towards EoD and just stopped trying.

Why are you making this hard for us SF? Just honestly, @Mod I don't know if that's against the rules but eh, I don't like it.

Like remember the world where I brought up SF could be town and town is just miscondemning. That is the world where Gamma + T3 is both town. And that scum is the quiet ones Kop, Titus, and + etc.

Man...

Like y'all are mad at Salsa because they're playing anti-town, but sb9 literally and openly scum claimed multiple times and has contributed zero content besides role fishing.