Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:51 am
wow.....
this is kind of what i was looking forjasonT1981 wrote:fur, im not going to argue anymore with you, ive made my points.. you have made yours.. ive countered your arguements, your countering mine.. our fight will end up taking over this game and take away from being able to find the last scum.
Temptation, thy name is Thor.Thor665 Post 1208 wrote:Sotty7 wrote:Because I'm trying to figure out who are last scum is between Mina and Thor atm.
We've got two lynches available last I checked. How about we lynch Mina - if she's not scum I'll probably be fine being lynched next because I'll have no clue who is.
Exactly....zzzzz...lets do this. More Mina votes.Thor665 wrote:Scum lost this game ages ago, we're just mopping up here.
Back to Mina buddy.Furcolow wrote:this is kind of what i was looking for
unvote
NoThor665 wrote:So, if Mina flips scum I'm allowed to mock Sotty, yes?
Well...Sotty7 wrote:I think benmage asks a great question of Mina, why aren't you voting Percy. You wrote that epic novel on him that really made me understand where you were coming from but for you not to follow up with a vote seems... Weird. Are you really second guessing yourself that much? There is a disconnect here somewhere.
Sotty, what do you think of Percy? You said you saw where I was coming from, but you didn't give your own thoughts on the case.Mina wrote:Kaleidoscope:
1) Why do you suspect Percy? Give us reasons. You mentioned that you hated his post about the Kingmaker. But on D1, was there anything else?
2) Why were you willing to explain to Percy before why you suspected Red Coyote, but not willing to explain to me why you suspected Percy?
3) I don't think you've answered this:Vote count before you switched from Percy to Red: 5 Percy vs. 4 RedPercy wrote: Why did you change your vote to RC at this point? I don't understand. You had said before that you were voting me only because of the size of the wagon. Moving your vote at this point made RC the bigger wagon by one vote because you moved from me. So, plz2explain?
Vote count after you switched from Percy to Red: 5 Red vs. 4 Percy
You see why "I voted for the biggest bandwagon" doesn't fly?
4) What were your thoughts on Baby Spice vs. Lrdwhyt/Empking? Why didn't you ever weigh in on the leading wagons? Who would you have voted for had you chosen between the two wagons before the deadline? Be honest.
I never believe it when people go "I was in the middle of writing" Bullshit. People go from not on the site, to being in the middle of writing something just as controversy sparks up. Post the notes atleast....What could you have had?Did you actually... plan on writing something...or were you literally writing something...I'd never not post or complete some sort of effort I did.Mina wrote:Actually, I was in the middle of writing a post in which I was going to vote forKaleidoscope, although mostly as pressure to get him to answer all the questions that he's been ignoring all game and give solid reads. Then had he answered my questions, I was going to vote for either Nul or Percy.
Saying you want to vote/wagon someone just for the sake of pressuring them nullifies all the pressure. *sigh* So basic.Mina wrote: Guys, can you wagon Kaleidoscope during phase 2, even if you don't lynch him? The slot could use a bit of pressure. Please get him to answer these questions:
Sotty has had me as a low-grade suspect all game, and you haven't attacked me once all game. Is this joke sincere, sarcastic, or just an attempt to look innocent? Are you really saying you'd deserve credit if I were scum when you'd have been the very LAST person to catch on?Thor665 wrote:So, if Mina flips scum I'm allowed to mock Sotty, yes?
All right, that does it. You're saying you find me "super suspicious"? I'm calling you on this.Thor665 wrote:Look at the number of pretty assured town we have. Look at the number of suspects you have. This is not hard math. If I am that big of a distraction/confusion to town I *should* be lynched. That's half the argument for Mina now - she's potential scum andshe's suspicious. We've got a hella'ton of lynches available. Let's pop the players who aresuper suspiciousand either nail scum or narrow the field. Scum lost this game ages ago, we're just mopping up here.
Thor665 wrote:Isn't voting Mina for dithering a bit like voting Furcolow for OMGUSing? I dunno, I agree Mina looks bad but she just doesn't feel that scummy to me. Meanwhile we have Empking who is most assuredly acting dicey around important wagons and whose predecessors did the same. He's even been bouncing around today trying to be wherever it looks like an alternate wagon is going to spring up.
Mina's last postlooks so town.
Empking's last post looks so scum.
Please don't make me have to evolve into Benmage as my next evolutionary step of meta.
Seriously. You don't just seem to suspect Empking more than me (although I left in the last line of that third quote for objectivity's sake). You seem to strongly feel thatThor665 wrote:No, I consider; 'hey look, we have 7 mislynches, here's a list of who we shouldn't lynch, now let's lynch everyone else (including me) and we almost assuredly win automatically and if not those people on the 'not lynch' list should be able to muddle through in endgame"a town tell. Also, I actually agree that if the case on her is legit she'd have to be pretty derpy town when it comes to understanding how to bus/defend her buddies.
At the very least I consider it less scummy then 'If I was scum I'd be on Percy right now...never mind that I was on Percy yesterday and was on Percy for a period of time today.'
Please explain why. I want lots and lots of words, beyond "sheeping Locke's case," which you never liked in the first place.Mina wrote:Okay, maybe I can buy that you're willing to lynch me in spite of your D2 town read simply to remove a distraction or get information, although it's not an argument I'm a fan of. But what happened to this:Thor665 wrote:My vote for Mina would pretty much beeither sheeping Locke's case, or for the reasons I noted in 1128 - and is probably a vague and uncertain combination of both. If she's scum, huzzah for our side, if she's town she has to go because we'll be having this debate before every single lynch otherwise.It seemed that you didn't like Locke's case much at the time, but now you're listing it as one of your primary reasons for voting me.I've only ever played with Mina as town. She dithers as town. Unless she doesn't dither as scum (which I doubt) all that shows is dithering is a normal part of her meta andis not the most optimal place to build a case and when I read Locke's case that's what I see - 'Mina didn't make solid commitments to reads'.
And hell, evenLocke Lamora wrote:Even if we do lynch those 5 candidates first, we should do it properly, hearing from everyone and seeing where and how they decide to place their votes. The large majority of accusations here are going to be town on town, so it's not going to be hard for the last scum to make people look bad for pushing for a townie lynch. If there was some heavy bussing going on and one of the 'town' players does turn out to be scum, they've got a breathing period of 4 or 5 easy lynches before anyone even starts to think they're scum. Let's not forget that we have people playing who can bus both their partners D1 and D2 and still win games as scum. That's why we should make them work hard and not end up on D5 or D6 saying 'hey, we haven't got anything out of Sotty for a while' or 'has anyone seen IAI?'.
Because people are getting a bit too complacent. Kaleidoscope and IAI have both posted once today, just to throw a mindless vote on Percy.I don't think we should be callous with our lynches at all, and this idea that we have mislynches to spare is a terribad attitude to encourage. If you weaken the conviction and reasoning required to join a wagon and allow for the "well I wasn't sure they weren't scum" defence for any mislynch the town's job becomes much, much harder.
Oh, fuck off.Benmage wrote: -She's town?
-As town: WHAT THE FUCK is wrong with her. Why is she bothering with all this when her lynch is inevitable and this game is in the bag. Her endless clutter of words are harming this town 10X more than any good they could bring. She's going to die. She should accept it. Maybe have a few CHOICE words and let it happen. Goddamn.
Because I'm personally unconvinced by his "One of Mina or Sotty absolutely has to be scum because of Baby Spice's weird Lrdwhyt vote" argument. After I flip, it sets him up to push you as a lynch after.Mina wrote:But speaking of which, what happened to this:
Percy wrote:I think Sotty is prob town after the flip. Unless it gets to LyLo and things are very confusing, I won't be making my promised case against her.So now Sotty is your second suspect if I flip town? What happened to Thor, IAI, and Furcolow? Or hell, Kaleidoscope or Nul?Percy wrote:Of course they all have a chance of being scum. The burden of proof rests with you, not me. I think they have less of a chance of being scum than other players; a scum continuum from least to most likely would look like <jason, Benmage, Locke, Sotty, Thor, IAI, Furcolow
hmmm i think you have this the wrong way round.Benmage wrote:
-Posting tons (why?)
-She's scum?
-As scum: her only option is to stall...post a lot, maybe attack someone else. Hope to appeal, get some sort of mercy-thing, and have things/pressure swing off her.
-She's town?
-As town: WHAT THE FUCK is wrong with her. Why is she bothering with all this when her lynch is inevitable and this game is in the bag. Her endless clutter of words are harming this town 10X more than any good they could bring. She's going to die. She should accept it. Maybe have a few CHOICE words and let it happen. Goddamn.
Conclusion: She's scum.