Page 50 of 99
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:35 am
by Titus
The guyett hammer is all about wifom. If you feel Guyett was positioning his defense, of course you would want to lynch him. If you felt Guyett is Guyett, you wouldn't. Personally, I would feel more secure if Guyett had a posted reason as to why the hammer, but it's not enough for top marks.
BE did little if anything of use and I just finished a game of resistance where scum BE did the same thing.
As for Jingle, I doubt any townplayer can persist in his bullshit. A little OMGUSy? You bet.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:48 am
by Guyett
In post 1225, Titus wrote:Personally, I would feel more secure if Guyett had a posted reason as to why the hammer, but it's not enough for top marks.
The hammer was going to happen anyway
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:56 am
by Titus
Guyett, I meant at the time of.
Sorry for the confusion. After the fact reason does nothing.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:01 am
by Guyett
Oh I did post reasoning for hammering then too
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:08 am
by Titus
That's not a reason FMPOV.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:14 am
by Guyett
It is from my POV and thats all I care about to be fucking honest
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:14 am
by Snork
I agree with this. I wasn't liking any of the BE posts later in the day. I'd be willing to lynch there.
Re: massclaim - What I'm kind of looking out of this is to hopefully cross reference any PR results with claimed actions. I'm not sure how this will happen, but I'd suggest scummiest to least as far as order goes. Another idea would be to claim "act" or "did not act". Then from there, we can probe. I actually think this is a better idea since it doesn't give scum any ideas about what to claim.
Thoughts on that?
Also we could all post our preferred order for the first 3 and then popcorn from there. I'd go
1. BE/Squirrel Girl
2. Jingle
3. Antihero
(then bubbajack)
In any case, I'd want Titus/ika to speak last.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:19 am
by Guyett
Ika won't be speaking bbz, he dead
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:22 am
by Titus
Snork, my rankings can be deduced and ika is dead. Did u mean Pants?
PR/VT massclaim is pretty good imo. Then fill in, if required. Anti keeps quiet on his target till the end or an impossible act arises. Ex: Adam claims cop with inno N1. Anti refutes bc target was rbed N1.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:23 am
by Titus
In post 1230, Guyett wrote:It is from my POV and thats all I care about to be fucking honest
If you are town, this is bad play. Others have to determine your alignment. Transparency is good.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:26 am
by Guyett
In post 1234, Titus wrote: In post 1230, Guyett wrote:It is from my POV and thats all I care about to be fucking honest
If you are town, this is bad play. Others have to determine your alignment. Transparency is good.
I'm a fearless motherfucker. My alignment should be pretty fucking obvious
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:26 am
by Guyett
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:28 am
by Titus
Guyett, fearless motherfucker says nothing about alignment.
Pants should pick first if popcorn or post order.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:29 am
by Guyett
I don't care where or when I claim
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile")
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:30 am
by Snork
Titus a
Roleblocker doesn't stop other actions from being performed on the target. It only stops the target from acting (blocking the role - not the player). Jailkeeper does that.
Anyway, yeah I meant Pants. And leave Guyett alone for now.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:31 am
by Guyett
In post 1237, Titus wrote:Guyett, fearless motherfucker says nothing about alignment.
you'd think that wouldn't you but I think you'll find out that you're gravely mistaken
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:32 am
by Guyett
But I like talking to people
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:37 am
by Titus
In post 1239, Snork wrote:Titus a
Roleblocker doesn't stop other actions from being performed on the target. It only stops the target from acting (blocking the role - not the player). Jailkeeper does that.
Anyway, yeah I meant Pants. And leave Guyett alone for now.
Right. So if Adam claimed cop but he was blocked, Adam or Anti should be lynched as that would be impossible.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:38 am
by Titus
*with night 1 inno
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:42 am
by Guyett
who the fuck is Adam?
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:43 am
by Titus
A hypothetical player.... that's a hypotheticsl.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:45 am
by Snork
In post 1242, Titus wrote: In post 1239, Snork wrote:Titus a
Roleblocker doesn't stop other actions from being performed on the target. It only stops the target from acting (blocking the role - not the player). Jailkeeper does that.
Anyway, yeah I meant Pants. And leave Guyett alone for now.
Right. So if Adam claimed cop but he was blocked, Adam or Anti should be lynched as that would be impossible.
Well I figured that's what you meant, but that's not what you said. You said the target was blocked. Anyway it doesn't matter lol - I know what you meant, just wanted to make sure you didn't actually mean the other thing.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:45 am
by Snork
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:51 am
by Titus
@Snork, I need to wake up then. Blah.
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 4:56 am
by Guyett
well I am drunk...
No I can't use that excuse... its not even midday and I don't think I could get away with that.... Hmm well I am quite tired from all of the work I've been doing and the insane heat... my toe is still sore and add to that a million mosquito bites and the pain is making it hard to concentrate.
Also I'm compiling lots a data and lose track of stuff...
Also I thought someone like bubba's actual name might be adam and you were just calling him by his actual name
