Mafiascum.net

In post 1226, Ankamius wrote:UNVOTE: Enter

Talk to me, Enter.

What exactly do you need to get into the game?

In post 11, demonlord wrote:VOTE: gamma

In post 12, Wisdom wrote:VOTE: gamma

In post 15, ofrhz wrote:Hi everybody!

My name is Selina Meyer, and I'm running to be your president! Can I count on your vote?



VOTE: ofrhz

In post 45, Enigma wrote:hi all

In post 66, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: Fuscosco

They feel really forced so far.

In post 181, Elsa Jay wrote:

In post 179, light_ganski wrote:

In post 170, Vedith wrote:
I'll kill you tonight

Statistically, people who scumclaim in jest tend to be scum

I refute this by saying I do this as any alignment.

In post 234, DoubtingThomas wrote:

In post 91, Fuscosco wrote:Thats the face Im making when he is asking a question; not about the question, but the style.

VOTE: fuscosco

In post 248, DoubtingThomas wrote: mindmelded

VOTE: ausuka

In post 281, Wisdom wrote:Not interested in ausuka wagon either

In post 292, Wisdom wrote:what are light and ausuka if not counterwagons

In post 293, Wisdom wrote:If anything, there *is* unwarranted resistance to the gamma wagon

In post 320, Sabrina LeCutie wrote:

In post 263, DoubtingThomas wrote:Top poster 20 minutes into joining the game

I am Locktown

Yeah, no.

Spamming =/= town. In fact, if it weren't for you replacing in and catching up, I'd say you'd be pretty scummy for trying this tactic.

You know what, fuck it, even for a replace in that spam seemed like you were trying to seem overly towny.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: DoubtingThomas

In post 353, Elsa Jay wrote:Tell us what your dinner was first before you conk out first.

In post 355, DoubtingThomas wrote:I joined mafia scum for one purpose.

TO CHANGE THE SITE'S META FROM PLAYING ANTI-TOWN ON PURPOSE FOR PERSONAL "META" REASONS THAT INCLUDES BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:

- Not contributing
- Not answering questions
- Ignoring posts
- Self voting
- Talking about subbing out
- Etc

Get off your high horse and play mafia with me

In post 1239, Enter wrote:

In post 320, Sabrina LeCutie wrote:

In post 263, DoubtingThomas wrote:Top poster 20 minutes into joining the game

I am Locktown

Yeah, no.

Spamming =/= town. In fact, if it weren't for you replacing in and catching up, I'd say you'd be pretty scummy for trying this tactic.

You know what, fuck it, even for a replace in that spam seemed like you were trying to seem overly towny.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: DoubtingThomas

scum

In post 1228, Ankamius wrote:What are you even talking about?

In post 1230, Enter wrote:

In post 1226, Ankamius wrote:UNVOTE: Enter

Talk to me, Enter.

What exactly do you need to get into the game?

Game state, important events, who's been pushed as a mislynch (or looks pretty mislynchable) and your top scum reads right now

In post 1234, Enter wrote:I was kinda half-skimming the first couple pages of the game thread and Ausuka caught my eye, so I ISO'd her

Not a big fan

People that aren't Ausuka, talk to me about Ausuka

Ausuka, talk to me about your reads

Spoiler: Ausuka stuff

In post 66, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: Fuscosco

They feel really forced so far.

In post 67, Fuscosco wrote:vote: ausuka

your face is forced

THIS feels forced.
In both directions.

In post 137, Ausuka wrote:

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

The reason I asked was because I can't follow the progression of "this could be town and this could be scum" then a vote. Like that's the definition of null and I know she said "I think it could be scum" but I don't really know how much confidence that's meant to convey and it altogether came across as non-comittal. Also I am literally voting the same person as light so why do you think I'm derailing the push that was exactly the same push as hers?

In post 130, light_ganski wrote:

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

^This. Who has a confident scum read on page 3?

It feels like derailment tactic if anything

If you think this why didn't you say anything before Dunnstral posted?

VOTE: lightganski

Actual OMGUS

Spoiler: Ausuka exclusively changing her vote almost every post in her ISO

In post 326, Ausuka wrote:the gamma wagon is confusing; i understand that it's a way to get the game started but i'd think it would be more prudent to vote for me or light or vedith rather than gamma.

i actually don't think anyone voting me is scummy yet; there's probably 1-2 scum in players like enigma, clemency, elsa, ofrhz? who feel kind of like they're holding back. there are a lot of nully people in general.

In post 399, Ausuka wrote:to those asking about my line about the gamma wagon; it generally seems like it would be a good idea to build on what we have, even if people are just pretending to actually believe it, then build a wagon that explicitly is not on a scumread because i think the first one would cause more pressure and cause the game to get started a lot faster. if there's a case on gamma that i missed i'd be wrong but i don't think there is one.

@enigma; those players are holding back in terms of content; it's certainly possible some of you are busy irl but we can't just assume that as an excuse for giving no content, i think.

In post 567, Ausuka wrote:UNVOTE:

dt is less scummy now i guess because i like their dunnstral push.

i don't really know where to go now though.

In post 669, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: sabrina

i think that this needs more pressure: i feel her policy push on dt is clearly not working and as town she would either take a different angle to pushing DT or push somebody else. Right now she feels like scum who's satisfied with her current position of mostly flying under the radar and being ignored.

In post 740, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: elsa jay

In post 963, Ausuka wrote:I feel like ofrhz's recent posts are kinda towny? Like it feels like they genuinely want to help town after their flip. There's probably scum in the claims so far but I'm not that interested in going there d1.

VOTE: Sabrina

In post 993, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: Gemerald
i feel like she's been kinda meh in this game and hasn't really felt like she's been trying to solve. her most recent post says that xyzzy is a dunce for trying to replace her; even though she didn't post for 6 days. this implies that xyzzy should know for some other reason that she isn't flaking on this game and i think the most likely possibility for that is that she's still been somewhat active in the scum PT.

In post 998, Ausuka wrote:Meh I guess Gamma's more likely just being randomly abrasive than real scum. The argument doesn't really work anymore if Gamma can't post at all during that time.

VOTE: Sabrina I guess this still works for me more than anything else but there's no momentum here :/

In post 1230, Enter wrote:

In post 1226, Ankamius wrote:UNVOTE: Enter

Talk to me, Enter.

What exactly do you need to get into the game?

who's been pushed as a mislynch (or looks pretty mislynchable)