Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 12:47 pm
I think it's a fair bet that this reads list never existedIn post 735, EvilDeanius wrote:This was supposed to be closely followed by a reads list I'm half way through. But unfortunately irl stuff got in the way, then I got distracted and it's still only like half done rn.
I don't know if I have an exact analogue. It's not a common thingIn post 1212, skitter30 wrote:I mean what scum have u seen have that mindset early in the game
This kind of fits my profile of scum lurk outIn post 1213, Detective Pikachu wrote:What bothers me the most about that is that I think we all pretty clearly designated it was skitter and he just did not follow up, didn't vote her, had no interactions
like it's a bravado "I'm gonna fite someone big" post and then he just nopes out of the thread wtf?
lol calm down we have plenty of timeIn post 1217, nomnomnom wrote:We're going to go nowhere if I stay in my little corner and everyone does the same, we're reaching deadline day without a strong consensus or push. What's the purpose of being stubborn here except cause confusion?
What I think is best is having a cohesive mindset. Scumreads aren't worth anything if you haven't convinced anyone and we just look at each other saying "LOOK THAT GUY IS SCUM SHEEP ME ALREADY" if nobody actually follows anyone you know? It's pointless.
I have no clue what you're trying to say here but i dont like the rolefish from edIn post 1214, u r a person 2 wrote:In post 143, EvilDeanius wrote:I can see Vork's point about the "Don't know how to play this" comment at the beginning, but the rest of the points I don't really get. Adding the WIFOM of it being a modifier can only help us. If somebody scum reads them, the fact that they've softed PR should mean nothing until they make an actual claim.
In post 116, Flubbernugget wrote:
Im drunk
Oh boy, I've been here before.
So he supports vorks push but with a hedge, and then argues against anyone taking the claim into account while making their reads. It's fence-sitting to the extreme
hold on i just got an email and I gotta see if I'm gonna be able to buy dave chappelle tickets or not hold this thought
you're not drunk again right? He's talking about the miller claim?In post 1231, Flubbernugget wrote:I have no clue what you're trying to say here but i dont like the rolefish from ed
I'm not sure how to explain it but this statement seems kinda townie to meIn post 1231, Flubbernugget wrote:I have no clue what you're trying to say here but i dont like the rolefish from edIn post 1214, u r a person 2 wrote:In post 143, EvilDeanius wrote:I can see Vork's point about the "Don't know how to play this" comment at the beginning, but the rest of the points I don't really get. Adding the WIFOM of it being a modifier can only help us. If somebody scum reads them, the fact that they've softed PR should mean nothing until they make an actual claim.
In post 116, Flubbernugget wrote:
Im drunk
Oh boy, I've been here before.
So he supports vorks push but with a hedge, and then argues against anyone taking the claim into account while making their reads. It's fence-sitting to the extreme
hold on i just got an email and I gotta see if I'm gonna be able to buy dave chappelle tickets or not hold this thought
It looked like he was fishing the not miller part of the claimIn post 1232, Detective Pikachu wrote:you're not drunk again right? He's talking about the miller claim?In post 1231, Flubbernugget wrote:I have no clue what you're trying to say here but i dont like the rolefish from ed
I quoted weird. I am accusing ED of fishing, not urapIn post 1237, Detective Pikachu wrote:Dude, urap was saying that ED's post was like, "blah blah blah this is what theoretical people do in response to a miller claim"
He wasn't like "I believe the miller claim" or "I don't believe the miller claim"
how do you get "fishing for modifiers" out of that post?
How was it obv town?In post 1244, Shoshin wrote:What caused you to scumread my slot, U2?
...because I scumread your slot?In post 1247, Shoshin wrote:Why are you still voting me, U2?