Mafiascum.net

In post 1224, Something_Smart wrote:I can ask how many living players are associated with the ___ stone.

Which would have to be warrior at this point, lol.

Can you put bodyguard in “how many players are aligned with bodyguard”

If Wake is lying, the answer is none.
If Wake is scum, the answer is 1.
All other numbers means he is town.

Eve should claim.

I think I really ought to do a votecount

Player	Votes	L-X	Voters
mastina	3	L-2	gobbledygook, alimdia, Eve
alimdia	1	L-4	Dongfish
Wake88	1	L-4	mastina
Not Voting	---	---	Something_Smart, Wake88, Sujimichi

The day will end in (expired on 2020-02-24 17:30:00) or when a lynch is achieved.
With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

In post 1226, gobbledygook wrote:Can you put bodyguard in “how many players are aligned with bodyguard”

Almost certainly not, I asked if I could put in a player name but was told I had to put an alignment (i.e. if I asked your question, it'd only count people whose role PM said "you win with the bodyguard").

In post 1194, gobbledygook wrote:Why is it more likely Wake is lying about being a bodyguard than Zenith lying, or me being scum with Dong?

Wake is a scumread. He could be scum lying about his role; he could be scum with a town role; this doesn't change the scumread. The role is not something which scum would never fakeclaim.

In contrast, Dong has claimed IC. This is a role scum would never fakeclaim--or at least, scum with any intention of winning the game while sticking to the claim and committing to it. Plus, even without the claim, I townread the slot.

Zenith's claim is mostly confirmed already. This means, not a fakeclaim. Plus, Zenith was a townread; Something_Smart continues that townread.

You were a scumread, but you have a cop innocent on you. My choices are,
-You are a godfather (nobody uses godfathers least of all in a mini, so no),
-My read on one of the two is wrong, or,
-My scumread on you is wrong.

The most likely of these is the third.

In post 1196, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 1192, mastina wrote:BS flipped scum

Come again?

Typo.

In post 1197, Something_Smart wrote:Mastina, what was the mod's justification for making you VT?

It doesn't do anything gameplay-wise and is for purely the male gaze.

In post 1198, Something_Smart wrote:Hey, guess what doesn't have an E in it?
"VT"

Sure but my role isn't VT, that's an abbreviation of Vanilla Townie, which does have an E.

He said "3P" as an abbreviation for third party is acceptable, I guess I should ask about "VT."

I could also just ask "vanilla." There being a goon with no VT's would surprise me.

Godfather isn't even possible. It wasn't a cop check, it was a direct question about alignment.

Update. Ixnay on the VT.

Vanilla's okay though.

In post 1233, Something_Smart wrote:Update. Ixnay on the VT.

Vanilla's okay though.

You can ask if a vanilla exists in the game? See I think a goon does make sense in a setup like this

In post 1234, PeaHen wrote:

In post 1233, Something_Smart wrote:Update. Ixnay on the VT.

Vanilla's okay though.

You can ask if a vanilla exists in the game? See I think a goon does make sense in a setup like this

Mastina, why would scum claim bodyguard?

In post 1223, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 1221, alimdia wrote:My side theory is that Suji is a serial killer, and one of them/scum failed their shot last night.

Why does SK-Suji kill Xtoxm?

Maybe he thought scum would kill SS/me/Dongfish so SK doesn't want to double up.

In post 1226, gobbledygook wrote:Can you put bodyguard in “how many players are aligned with bodyguard”

If Wake is lying, the answer is none.
If Wake is scum, the answer is 1.
All other numbers means he is town.

good idea

In post 1229, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 1226, gobbledygook wrote:Can you put bodyguard in “how many players are aligned with bodyguard”

Almost certainly not, I asked if I could put in a player name but was told I had to put an alignment (i.e. if I asked your question, it'd only count people whose role PM said "you win with the bodyguard").

ah fuck.
so that question is basically the same as "Is there a blank" in terms of asking for third-party

so mastina basically claimed VT again, what about Eve?

Someone would know if they blocked a shot last night (unless I shot Something_Smart) and would have called me out for lying at this point. As I said, I did not shoot because I require the Thief Stone to be active (which is why you can see me pushing for that the entire game). Also to note, I am the only reason why one Mafia member is dead so perhaps we should focus our efforts on lynching the remaining Mafia instead of side theories.

Well we are lynching mastina atm.

whenever the thief stone is activated - i have a power for the day and next night

Something Smart should be able to discern what this is without me claiming fully

Mastina what does it say in the flavour part of your role PM for why you're s VT?

Catching up

- Dong

I think that someone in the neighbourhood is definitwly scum. I agree with gobs process that two of wake/mastina/alim/eve are scum and if eve isnt scum, then one of the remaining people in the NH are scum due to POE.
And i think its inconceivable that both eve and mastina are scum because if eve is scum, the most sensible option from her would be to put his partner in the neighbourhood to disrupt their progress and to act as sort of a mule for her.
Theres a possibility that eve WIFOMd and made all 3 people in the neighbourhood town so they would be suspicious of themselves normally without the risk of scum getting caught, but theres a chance they'll use it like masonry if they can get themselves confirmed/tr each other hard, also eve/mastina team then wouldnt be able to sway their opinions so that might be problematic for them.
In any case, im suspicious of alimdia and eves role seems iffy, also dont like that eve instantly exposed the neighbourhood so i can vote there.

haha what do you seriously think i'm scum who got to choose who was in the neignhourhood? this is great

my prediction for last scum is mastina and alimdia

if not alimdia probably Wake

In post 1239, alimdia wrote:Well we are lynching mastina atm.

What's the case on Mastina in a nutshell?

In post 1245, Wake1 wrote:

In post 1239, alimdia wrote:Well we are lynching mastina atm.

What's the case on Mastina in a nutshell?

Its pretty small but mainly POE and them talking very little

POE because...
can't lynch dongfish and gobble
can't lynch zenith (note zenith and gobble might still be scum)
suji vig or not is self resolving
cant lynch me cos need me to do lvl 4 thief stone
you bodyguard or not is self resolving

That literally only leaves Eve and mastina. We can lynch one and vig the other if the first one flips town

In post 1242, wrong fish wrote:Catching up

- Dong

I think that someone in the neighbourhood is definitwly scum. I agree with gobs process that two of wake/mastina/alim/eve are scum and if eve isnt scum, then one of the remaining people in the NH are scum due to POE.
And i think its inconceivable that both eve and mastina are scum because if eve is scum, the most sensible option from her would be to put his partner in the neighbourhood to disrupt their progress and to act as sort of a mule for her.
Theres a possibility that eve WIFOMd and made all 3 people in the neighbourhood town so they would be suspicious of themselves normally without the risk of scum getting caught, but theres a chance they'll use it like masonry if they can get themselves confirmed/tr each other hard, also eve/mastina team then wouldnt be able to sway their opinions so that might be problematic for them.
In any case, im suspicious of alimdia and eves role seems iffy, also dont like that eve instantly exposed the neighbourhood so i can vote there.

In post 1243, Eve wrote:haha what do you seriously think i'm scum who got to choose who was in the neignhourhood? this is great

Yea why do you think Eve got to pick neighbourhood ppl?

In post 1240, Eve wrote:whenever the thief stone is activated - i have a power for the day and next night

Something Smart should be able to discern what this is without me claiming fully

claim fully pls.

Let’s cook this bird