Page 50 of 208
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:37 pm
by PenguinPower
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:37 pm
by lilith2013
|
| | | | | |
Gamma Emerald | Nosferatu | EL-6 | 3 | 2 | 4 | Gamma Emerald |
SirCakez | None | EL-7 | 2 | 3 | 3 | SirCakez |
CreativeMod1 | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | CreativeMod1 |
Albert B. Rampage | Noraa | EL-6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Albert B. Rampage |
Chara | CreativeMod1, I Keep Siteflaking | EL-5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Chara |
Bingle | PenguinPower, JohnnyFarrar | EL-5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Bingle |
Nosferatu | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Nosferatu |
I Keep Siteflaking | Albert B. Rampage, Gamma Emerald | EL-5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | I Keep Siteflaking |
PenguinPower | SirCakez | EL-6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | PenguinPower |
Fun and Games | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Fun and Games |
Noraa | Bingle | EL-6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Noraa |
JohnnyFarrar | Fun and Games | EL-6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | JohnnyFarrar |
Not Voting | Chara |
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to eliminate.
Deadline: (expired on 2020-10-12 23:12:18) paused at 1 day, 16 hours |
Deadline is currently paused while I search for a replacement for Nosferatu.
pagetops: Lilith 22 | penguin 11 | ABR 4 | johnnyf 3 | cm1 2 | gamma 2 | gb 1 | fun & games 1 | nosferatu 1 | bingle 1 | iks 1 |
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:38 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
Weak? Yes. Dark motivations? No. I've been pretty up front about not voting penguin, Albert, etc. People keep wagoning those i suspect
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:40 pm
by Fun and Games
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:41 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
I'm also made nervous by, and thereby not joining this iks wagon tyvm
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:42 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1227, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Weak? Yes. Dark motivations? No. I've been pretty up front about not voting penguin, Albert, etc. People keep wagoning those i suspect
dude you made a whole thing about finding us scummy, couldn't say why, and when you read our iso to try to justify your read couldn't really come up with anything
you understand why that looks bad, no? and why that looks to me like you were trying to justify your push on us
also weren't you scumreading albert earlier? and indicated you were willing to push/vote him?
also you keep flipping your vote, and seem to lack conviction over anything ...
~ skitter
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:42 pm
by PenguinPower
Thoughts on Bingle while you’re here?
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:43 pm
by Fun and Games
that doesn't really match your progression on him ... you keep making a point of calling him scummy / putting him in your pool
~ skitter
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:45 pm
by Fun and Games
me?
i'd put him on the +town side, i guess, but not with super high confidence
woudln't vote him today tho
my other head thinks he's scummy but we discussed it at length and we ultimately agreed that the things he's scumreading him for are nai
~ skitter
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:46 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
Yeah and I also said I might be feeling omgus (thats the term right) and asked others to look into our interaction. And no one did, so I lost wind
P-edit : Iiii know! I'm really geostationary by this whole iks situation
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:58 pm
by PenguinPower
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:03 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
Geostationary = frustrated idk WHAT my phone is on
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:04 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1234, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Yeah and I also said I might be feeling omgus (thats the term right) and asked others to look into our interaction. And no one did, so I lost wind
P-edit : Iiii know! I'm really geostationary by this whole iks situation
where did this even happen ???!
primarily my other head thought his setup spec/knowledge was scummy in a tmi way
but he's enver played with him i think and we talked about how i thought it was p par for the course for him, and not really unusual, and we settled on that bit not being scummy for him
that was the main driving factor of his scumread on him
lol i agree
~ skitter
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:08 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 1237, Fun and Games wrote:primarily my other head thought his setup spec/knowledge was scummy in a tmi way
but he's enver played with him i think and we talked about how i thought it was p par for the course for him, and not really unusual, and we settled on that bit not being scummy for him
that was the main driving factor of his scumread on him
Agree, and I’ve said as much that setup spec is nai for Bingle. What about his voting pattern versus statements?
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:13 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
In post 1051, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Also @everyone else I think I might be falling into "how dare this person suspect me" territory in regards to the questions they asked me while trying to sus me out or whatever, could someone less biased take a look?
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:17 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1238, PenguinPower wrote:Agree, and I’ve said as much that setup spec is nai for Bingle. What about his voting pattern versus statements?
not sure i know what you're getting at with this?
~ skitter
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:18 pm
by PenguinPower
In post 1083, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 517, PenguinPower wrote:Voting lurkers has an excellent history of accomplishing things, sure.
Lame defense gamma.
My point is he made these same reads yesterday and moved off both his scum reads and ended up elsewhere. That’s scummy. I gave Bingle benefit of the doubt day 1 but that doesn’t extend to day 2.
VOTE: Bingle
With the addition that he hasn't done much of anything with his vote today. As mentioned earlier, Bingle talking mechanics is a requirement from him as either alignment so people giving him townpoints for that is not good.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:18 pm
by Fun and Games
In post 1239, JohnnyFarrar wrote: In post 1051, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Also @everyone else I think I might be falling into "how dare this person suspect me" territory in regards to the questions they asked me while trying to sus me out or whatever, could someone less biased take a look?
so you just dropped the whole thing cuz nobody answered you ... ?
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:19 pm
by JohnnyFarrar
Wind, sails, gone, etc.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:20 pm
by Fun and Games
lemme reskim bingle
agree he should not get townpoints solely for mechanics
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:25 pm
by Fun and Games
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:26 pm
by Fun and Games
wrt bingle, i can see your point, but i'm not sure i find it as compelling as you do
i think his push on gamma is more cause for concern
~ skitter
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:26 pm
by PenguinPower
But you do have a cause for concern now...
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:28 pm
by SirCakez
In post 1246, Fun and Games wrote:wrt bingle, i can see your point, but i'm not sure i find it as compelling as you do
i think his push on gamma is more cause for concern
~ skitter
Why?
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 2:29 pm
by Fun and Games
yeah but johnny is like significantly more scummy and i wanna be stubborn and still be voting there
pedit because gamma is kinda obviously town and bingle's case is based on a whole lotta assumptions that i'm not sure hold